Posts Tagged ‘hillary’

Hillary’s Brown Shirts: Soros-Funded Rent-a-Rioters





Liberal activist organizations, helmed by those close to the Hillary Clinton campaign, may soon receive millions in funds from leftist money-man George Soros.

A network of the nation’s wealthiest liberals and left-wing activists are weighing whether they will throw their financial support behind the new groups and protest organizations that have emerged since the election of President Trump.

USA Today reports that Democracy Alliance, an organization close to the Soros network, is deciding if it will funnel cash in to various protest groups, specifically ‘Indivisible’ and those behind the ‘Women’s March’.

The Soros funding will support a ‘rapid response’ team that can be quickly deployed to foment protests and chaos on a range of issues, such as the deportation of illegal immigrants or GOP town hall events.

Leaders from the organizations, many of whom are prominent Clinton aids, will make their pitch this week….


More on Soros:

Soros is known for using his money to finance some pretty despicable things.

He facilitates various organizations, foundations, and financial sources as tools for an empire designed to mold the world to his own warped vision.  His  accomplishments include trying to silence media opponents, funding ACORN, financing his vision of a post-America New World Order, and spreading his malignant Fabian socialist ideology throughout economic and political infrastructures. He speculated the Bank of England into financial catastrophe. He also funded some of the groups behind the violence in the Ferguson riots.The FBI needs to investigate Soros and his merry band of lowlifes, but then Comey is still in charge.



Related post:

Related article:

Hillary Ally McAuliffe Gave $675,000 to Wife of FBI Agent Involved in Email Investigation

More Clinton corruption.

From the NY Post

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton confidant, helped steer $675,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an FBI official who went on to lead the probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email system, according to a report.

The political action committee of McAuliffe, the Clinton loyalist, gave $467,500 to the state Senate campaign of the wife of Andrew McCabe, who is now deputy director of the FBI, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The report states Jill McCabe received an additional $207,788 from the Virginia Democratic Party, which is heavily influenced by McAuliffe.

The money directed by McAuliffe began flowing two months after the FBI investigation into Clinton began in July 2015. Around that time, the candidate’s husband was promoted from running the Washington field office for the FBI to the No. 3 position at the bureau.

Within a year, McCabe was promoted to deputy director, the second-highest position in the bureau.

In a statement to the Journal, the FBI said McCabe “played no role, attended no events, and did not participate in fundraising or support of any kind. Months after the completion of her campaign, then-Associate Deputy Director McCabe was promoted to Deputy, where, in that position, he assumed for the first time, an oversight role in the investigation into Secretary Clinton’s emails.”

Notice how the FBI ignores the blatant conflict of interest.

The governor’s office claimed the FBI’s McCabe met the governor only once — on March 7, 2015, when McAuliffe persuaded Jill McCabe to run.

The 2015 Virginia state Senate run — her first attempt to gain public office — was unsuccessful as she lost to the incumbent Republican.

McAuliffe “supported Jill McCabe because he believed she would be a good state senator. This is a customary practice for Virginia governors … Any insinuation that his support was tied to anything other than his desire to elect candidates who would help pass his agenda is ridiculous,” a spokesman for the Virginia governor told the Journal.

McAuliffe has been a longtime backer of the Clintons, even serving as Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair in 2008.

The FBI is still covering for Hillary and her accomplices. Note to James Comey: She lost. You can prosecute now. Better yet, it’s time for Trump to fire your ass.

Related posts:

You Know It’s Bad When Even the Left Wingnuts at HuffPo Have to Tell Their Fellow Nutters: “Hillary Lost, Get Over It”

From—amazingly—H.A. Goodman at HuffPo.


Stop blaming WikiLeaks.

Stop blaming Russia.

Stop citing a secret CIA report, especially since The New York Times published an article on October 31, 2016 titled Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia:

“Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.”

Therefore, the FBI has already contradicted the CIA on its Russian conspiracy theories.

Was this New York Times article an example of “fake” news?

As for Russian interference through WikiLeaks, NSA Chief Mike Rogers is quoted on November 21, 2016 in The Hill stating DNC emails had little impact on the election:

“National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers said Sunday that he does not believe the publication of stolen Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails affected the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

“I don’t think in the end it had the effect that [the hackers] had hoped it might,” Rogers said during a panel at the Halifax International Security Forum.

Senate Armed Services Chairman John McCain (R-Az.) expressed a similar sentiment on Saturday, stating that, “I do not think that the outcome of the election was impacted by Russian hacking.”

The FBI and NSA have already contradicted The Washington Post and CIA. Even Sen. John McCain stated that he didn’t think “the outcome of the election was impacted by Russian hacking.”

Did the NSA’s Mike Rogers engage in a “fake” news conspiracy?

……But she won the popular vote!

Yes, but Clinton raised $1.4 billion and outspent Trump by a margin of 2:1.  Also, California is the primary reason Clinton won the popular vote.  As stated by, “Without California in the popular vote totals, Trump leads the rest of the states combined by more than 1.87 million popular votes.”

The hundreds of millions raised by Clinton were wasted on a campaign riddled with controversy, FBI probes, and allegations of election fraud.

It’s not the fault of Russia, WikiLeaks or Trump that Clinton wasted $1.4 billion. White nationalists didn’t cheat Bernie Sanders and sexism isn’t the reason Jill Stein voters shunned Clinton. At the end of the day, Hillary Clinton was such a polarizing figure that both left and right found reasons to either stay home or vote Republican.

Clinton lost Wisconsin.

The last time Wisconsin voted Republican in a presidential election was 1984; the state voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. White nationalism had nothing to do with Clinton losing Wisconsin, nor did Russia, “fake” news, or WikiLeaks.

Clinton lost Michigan and Pennsylvania. Michigan and Pennsylvania haven’t voted for a Republican nominee since 1988. Both states chose Obama over Romney and McCain.

White nationalism had nothing to do with Clinton losing Wisconsin, nor did Russia, “fake” news, or WikiLeaks.

Democrats knew they had to win the Electoral College, so any emphasis on the popular vote ignores why Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin voted for Obama, but chose Trump over Clinton.

Ultimately, Democrats picked a candidate who faced two FBI investigations, low favorability ratings, and Clinton Foundation controversies. Democrats would never accuse CNN of “fake” news, therefore let’s evaluate a piece titled FBI boss Comey’s 7 most damning lines on Clinton:

1. “Extremely careless”

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

2. “Should have known”

“There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position…should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”

3. “Especially concerning”

“None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at agencies and departments of the United States government ― or even with a commercial email service like Gmail.”

4. “Still obligated to protect it”

“…even if information is not marked ‘classified’ in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”

5. “Generally lacking”

While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information that is found elsewhere in the government.

6. “Hostile actors”

“We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial email accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.”

7. “Sophisticated adversaries”

“She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.”Were James Comey’s statements regarding Clinton’s handling of classified information examples of “fake” news? Is it Russia’s fault Hillary Clinton was “extremely careless” with classified data or that “sophisticated adversaries” could have “gained access” to Clinton’s server?

Is it the fault of Julian Assange or WikiLeaks that Defense Secretary Robert Gates believed Russia, China and Iran may have hacked Clinton’s private server?

Were the 22 Top Secret emails on Clinton’s unencrypted server the product of a “fake” news story?

The latest public relations campaign from The Washington Post states that Russia interfered with America’s election. I explain here why the CIA has refused to provide evidence for such claims. Apparently, providing any proof pertaining to Russian hackers would help Russia.

Does this make sense to you?

Senator Angus King states “If you provide proof, you provide a roadmap to show the Russians how we caught them… including intelligence sources and methods.”

Welcome to 1984.

Without any evidence (emails, transcripts, photos, videos, suspects, etc.) the CIA and Washington Post have accused Russia of providing WikiLeaks with hacked emails.

The problem with this theory, aside from the pesky issue of evidence, is that Podesta’s emails involve the actual words of Clinton’s campaign. Essentially, Putin had the audacity to interfere by using Clinton’s own words, and the words of her campaign, against Democrats. Through these words, found within pristine emails in WikiLeaks DNC and Podesta releases, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (and four other DNC officials) resigned from the DNC and Donna Brazile resigned from CNN.

……Don’t blame Russia for influencing our elections without evidence. Hearsay isn’t evidence.

Don’t blame “fake” news for Clinton’s FBI investigation or Anthony Weiner’s laptop.


As I stated myself, Russia certainly has the capability to cyber hack, but I guarantee that Hillary’s corruption, and the flood of leaked emails from WikiLeaks,  which showcased the vulgar bigotry and dismissive arrogance, of Podesta, the DNC, Hillary, Hillary’s aides, and the lapdog media, were the catalyst that convinced even undecided voters to reject her.


Bill Whittle on Hillary’s Final Disgrace

At Front Page Magazine



Leaked Emails Show Collusion Between Hillary, DOJ

From Fox News.


Republicans accused the Hillary Clinton campaign and Obama Justice Department of “collusion” on Tuesday after an email surfaced from the latest WikiLeaks document dump indicating the Clinton camp got a heads-up from the DOJ about one of the former secretary of state’s court cases.

The May 2015 email from Clinton spokesman Brian Fallon said, “DOJ folks inform me there is a status hearing in this case this morning, so we could have a window into the judge’s thinking about this proposed production schedule as quickly as today.”

The Fallon email apparently pertained to one of the lawsuits seeking the production of Clinton’s emails while at the State Department.

……The Republican National Committee also invoked the controversial tarmac meeting Attorney General Loretta Lynch had with Bill Clinton, before the FBI and Justice Department ultimately decided not to pursue any charges over Hillary Clinton’s personal email use.

“Emails showing the Department of Justice was giving Hillary Clinton’s campaign inside information about an ongoing investigation into her email server is deeply disturbing and raises even more questions about Bill Clinton’s tarmac meeting with Attorney General Loretta Lynch,” RNC Chairman Reince Priebus said in a statement.


Earlier this year, Lynch met with Bill Clinton on board her private jet in what was clearly a conflict of interest and a conversation on whether or not the DOJ would indict Hillary for her crimes.

After that, the fix was in.



Related post: