Posts Tagged ‘hillary’

Hillary’s Election Night Meltdown: ‘She was in a “psychotic drunken rage’

Via Austin Miles at ipatriot

……election night was like The Wizard of Oz, complete with the witch melting down to nothing after being splashed with water, screaming, “AHHHH….what a world…what a world!”

As we fact-checked the story, we found that a similar version of the election night episode had been published by American Spectator and Breitbart, both credible news sources and so, here is what we received.

Hillary Clinton’s post election celebration plans included hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of fireworks, live performances by various celebrities, such as Cher, who came believing that Hillary was going to win the election, a five-hundred-thousand-dollar special effect glass ceiling that she  would break through in a dramatic display once she walked out on stage at her H.Q., among millions of dollars worth of other celebratory preparations, all paid for by the Clinton Foundation in full.

The most notable damage was located deep in the VIP room of the Clinton camp. A custom 150 inch ultra HD TV, a gift from the Saudi Arabian government, was found with a broken screen. The damage was caused by a $950,000 bottle of champagne that was believed to have been thrown at the screen by the former presidential candidate some time during the election.

Early in the morning, the custodial staff were greeted by flipped-over tables as the floors were covered with expensive food, drinks, and appetizers. Broken champagne flutes and gilded silverware were also seen scattered around the would-be party room.

The  most telling sign of a massive meltdown was the cake. The pastry that  had once proudly displayed the presidential seal, was violently flung against the walls in chunks. A broken topper from the cake in the shape of the white house was discovered lodged firmly into the drywall near the dessert table.

Clinton ’s splurge on party supplies was merely an echo of all the left-leaning polls and hype that “confirmed” Hillary Clinton’s indubitable win. Misled by just about every prediction, Hillary Clinton personally planned one big party for her assumed victory. Once it became clear that it would not be Clinton ‘s night, however, the mood of the party soured rapidly.

A former staffer, who was fired during the rampage, said that the atmosphere around Clinton went from “queen of the hour” to “the girl who was dumped on prom night” in only a few moments.

Hillary Clinton reportedly became “physically violent” towards her own campaign staff after she realized she had lost the presidential election, according to radio host Todd Kincannon. “CNN reporter tells me Hillary became physically violent towards Robby Mook and John Podesta around midnight; had to be briefly restrained,” tweeted Kincannon.

It was Podesta who was sent out to talk to Hillary’s dejected supporters shortly before Hillary called Donald Trump to concede, with Clinton nowhere to be seen until the following day.

When asked about rumors that Hillary was drunk on election night, Kincannon responded, “She was. I posted about that too. She was in a “psychotic drunken rage” according to my reporter friend. A doctor added sedatives to the mix.”

Kincannon then claimed that CNN blocked the reporter from publishing what would have been a bombshell story.  “The CNN reporter didn’t fail to report it. His editors will not let him. CNN  has banned all “Hillary in the bunker” stories,” he  tweeted.

Secret Service officials and other staff who  worked closely alongside Hillary have previously reported her problems with angry tantrums on numerous occasions. Last year it was also reported that Clinton ’s own campaign staffers feared she could have a serious meltdown and that Hillary had  “been having screaming, child-like tantrums that have left staff members in tears and unable to work.”

In addition to claims that she became irate, author Ed Klein said a source told him Hillary cried  inconsolably to a friend after the results came in, blaming FBI director Comey and President Barack Obama for not doing enough to stop the FBI investigation into her email scandal.

Having spent time in D.C. and in The West Wing where I talked with Hillary staffers I was told that Hillary, like a wicked queen, forbid staff members from making any eye contact with her in the hallways. Indeed when they did see her coming they could not look at her, and had to duck behind a pillar or anything else so as not to be seen by her. These and other things revealed to me makes this story seem perfectly plausible.

Hillary’s  corruption was enough to keep her out of the White House, but can you imagine this deranged, squalling she-ass as president?

 

 

Related post:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/hillary-blames-comey-wikileaks-and-misogyny-for-election-defeat/

‘Shattered’ Book: Hillary and Advisers Hatched ‘Blame Russia’ Meme 24 Hours After Election Defeat

Via Breitbart

The new Clinton campaign tell-all, Shattered: Inside Hillary Clinton’s Doomed Campaign, reveals how Hillary Clinton personally placed blame for her bruising defeat on Russian meddling “within twenty-four hours of her concession speech.”
The blistering behind-the-scenes book, by Jonathan Allen and Amie Parnes, illustrates how Hillary Clinton furiously blamed her defeat on the FBI investigation into her private emails, Russian interference, and Trump’s supposed support from “white nationalists.”

From Shattered:

“On a phone call with a longtime friend a couple of days after the election, Hillary was much less accepting of her defeat. She put a fine point on the factors she believed cost her the presidency: the FBI (Comey), the KGB (the old name for Russia’s intelligence service), and the KKK (the support Trump got from white nationalists).

“I’m angry,” Hillary told her friend. And exhausted. After two brutal campaigns against Sanders and Trump, Hillary now had to explain the failure to friends in a seemingly endless round of phone calls. That was taking a toll on her already weary and grief-stricken soul. But mostly, she was mad— mad that she’d lost and that the country would have to endure a Trump presidency.”

The authors detail how Clinton went out of her way to pass blame for her stunning loss on “Comey and Russia.”

“She wants to make sure all these narratives get spun the right way,” a longtime Clinton confidant is quoted as saying.

The book further highlights how Clinton’s Russia-blame-game was a plan hatched by senior campaign staffers John Podesta and Robby Mook, less than “within twenty-four hours” after she conceded:

“That strategy had been set within twenty-four hours of her concession speech. Mook and Podesta assembled her communications team at the Brooklyn headquarters to engineer the case that the election wasn’t entirely on the up-and-up. For a couple of hours, with Shake Shack containers littering the room, they went over the script they would pitch to the press and the public. Already, Russian hacking was the centerpiece of the argument.”

The Clinton camp settled on a two-pronged plan — pushing the press to cover how “Russian hacking was the major unreported story of the campaign, overshadowed by the contents of stolen e-mails and Hillary’s own private-server imbroglio,” while “hammering the media for focusing so intently on the investigation into her e-mail, which had created a cloud over her candidacy,” the authors wrote.

“The press botched the e-mail story for eighteen months,” one person who was part of the strategy is quoted as saying. “Comey obviously screwed us, but the press created the story.”

The book also details Clinton’s confusion and frustration with President Obama, whom she apparently thought didn’t do enough “to apprise the public that the Russians had gone way beyond what had been reported”:

“She wondered why the president hadn’t leaned harder into making the case that Vladimir Putin was specifically targeting her and trying to throw the election to Trump. “The Russia stuff has really bothered her a lot,” one of the aides said. “She’s sort of learning what the administration knew and when they knew it, and she’s just sort of quizzical about the whole thing. She can’t quite sort out how this all played out the way that it did.” On the long list of people, agencies, and international forces Hillary blamed for her loss, Obama had a spot.”

Comey screwed her?? Fucking. Please.  That crooked son of a bitch did his level damndest to cover her ass.  She should be thanking him for all the obstruction of justice he pulled in her favor.

I guarantee that Hillary’s  corruption and the flood of leaked emails, which showcased the vulgar bigotry and dismissive arrogance of Podesta, the DNC, Hillary, Hillary’s aides, and the lapdog media, were the catalyst that convinced even  undecided voters to reject her.

She wishes it were Russia.

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2016/12/12/guess-who-orchestrated-the-russians-influenced-the-election-crap/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/04/07/hillary-blames-comey-wikileaks-and-misogyny-for-election-defeat/

Hillary’s Brown Shirts: Soros-Funded Rent-a-Rioters

soros-riots

 

 

From Hannity.com

Liberal activist organizations, helmed by those close to the Hillary Clinton campaign, may soon receive millions in funds from leftist money-man George Soros.

A network of the nation’s wealthiest liberals and left-wing activists are weighing whether they will throw their financial support behind the new groups and protest organizations that have emerged since the election of President Trump.

USA Today reports that Democracy Alliance, an organization close to the Soros network, is deciding if it will funnel cash in to various protest groups, specifically ‘Indivisible’ and those behind the ‘Women’s March’.

The Soros funding will support a ‘rapid response’ team that can be quickly deployed to foment protests and chaos on a range of issues, such as the deportation of illegal immigrants or GOP town hall events.

Leaders from the organizations, many of whom are prominent Clinton aids, will make their pitch this week….

 

More on Soros:

Soros is known for using his money to finance some pretty despicable things.

He facilitates various organizations, foundations, and financial sources as tools for an empire designed to mold the world to his own warped vision.  His  accomplishments include trying to silence media opponents, funding ACORN, financing his vision of a post-America New World Order, and spreading his malignant Fabian socialist ideology throughout economic and political infrastructures. He speculated the Bank of England into financial catastrophe. He also funded some of the groups behind the violence in the Ferguson riots.The FBI needs to investigate Soros and his merry band of lowlifes, but then Comey is still in charge.

 

 

Related post:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/02/05/soros-funds-thugs-behind-berkeley-riots/

Related article:

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/21/clinton-staffers-may-receive-soros-funding-for-trump-war/

Hillary Ally McAuliffe Gave $675,000 to Wife of FBI Agent Involved in Email Investigation

More Clinton corruption.

From the NY Post

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton confidant, helped steer $675,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an FBI official who went on to lead the probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email system, according to a report.

The political action committee of McAuliffe, the Clinton loyalist, gave $467,500 to the state Senate campaign of the wife of Andrew McCabe, who is now deputy director of the FBI, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The report states Jill McCabe received an additional $207,788 from the Virginia Democratic Party, which is heavily influenced by McAuliffe.

The money directed by McAuliffe began flowing two months after the FBI investigation into Clinton began in July 2015. Around that time, the candidate’s husband was promoted from running the Washington field office for the FBI to the No. 3 position at the bureau.

Within a year, McCabe was promoted to deputy director, the second-highest position in the bureau.

In a statement to the Journal, the FBI said McCabe “played no role, attended no events, and did not participate in fundraising or support of any kind. Months after the completion of her campaign, then-Associate Deputy Director McCabe was promoted to Deputy, where, in that position, he assumed for the first time, an oversight role in the investigation into Secretary Clinton’s emails.”

Notice how the FBI ignores the blatant conflict of interest.

The governor’s office claimed the FBI’s McCabe met the governor only once — on March 7, 2015, when McAuliffe persuaded Jill McCabe to run.

The 2015 Virginia state Senate run — her first attempt to gain public office — was unsuccessful as she lost to the incumbent Republican.

McAuliffe “supported Jill McCabe because he believed she would be a good state senator. This is a customary practice for Virginia governors … Any insinuation that his support was tied to anything other than his desire to elect candidates who would help pass his agenda is ridiculous,” a spokesman for the Virginia governor told the Journal.

McAuliffe has been a longtime backer of the Clintons, even serving as Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair in 2008.

The FBI is still covering for Hillary and her accomplices. Note to James Comey: She lost. You can prosecute now. Better yet, it’s time for Trump to fire your ass.

Related posts:
https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2016/10/12/rank-and-file-in-fbi-doj-infuriated-with-decision-not-to-indict-hillary-for-her-crimes/
https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2016/09/24/fbi-handed-out-immunity-like-candy-to-cover-for-hillary/

You Know It’s Bad When Even the Left Wingnuts at HuffPo Have to Tell Their Fellow Nutters: “Hillary Lost, Get Over It”

From—amazingly—H.A. Goodman at HuffPo.

Excerpts:

Stop blaming WikiLeaks.

Stop blaming Russia.

Stop citing a secret CIA report, especially since The New York Times published an article on October 31, 2016 titled Investigating Donald Trump, F.B.I. Sees No Clear Link to Russia:

“Law enforcement officials say that none of the investigations so far have found any conclusive or direct link between Mr. Trump and the Russian government. And even the hacking into Democratic emails, F.B.I. and intelligence officials now believe, was aimed at disrupting the presidential election rather than electing Mr. Trump.”

Therefore, the FBI has already contradicted the CIA on its Russian conspiracy theories.

Was this New York Times article an example of “fake” news?

As for Russian interference through WikiLeaks, NSA Chief Mike Rogers is quoted on November 21, 2016 in The Hill stating DNC emails had little impact on the election:

“National Security Agency Director Mike Rogers said Sunday that he does not believe the publication of stolen Democratic National Committee (DNC) emails affected the outcome of the 2016 presidential election.

“I don’t think in the end it had the effect that [the hackers] had hoped it might,” Rogers said during a panel at the Halifax International Security Forum.

Senate Armed Services Chairman John McCain (R-Az.) expressed a similar sentiment on Saturday, stating that, “I do not think that the outcome of the election was impacted by Russian hacking.”

The FBI and NSA have already contradicted The Washington Post and CIA. Even Sen. John McCain stated that he didn’t think “the outcome of the election was impacted by Russian hacking.”

Did the NSA’s Mike Rogers engage in a “fake” news conspiracy?

……But she won the popular vote!

Yes, but Clinton raised $1.4 billion and outspent Trump by a margin of 2:1.  Also, California is the primary reason Clinton won the popular vote.  As stated by Heavy.com, “Without California in the popular vote totals, Trump leads the rest of the states combined by more than 1.87 million popular votes.”

The hundreds of millions raised by Clinton were wasted on a campaign riddled with controversy, FBI probes, and allegations of election fraud.

It’s not the fault of Russia, WikiLeaks or Trump that Clinton wasted $1.4 billion. White nationalists didn’t cheat Bernie Sanders and sexism isn’t the reason Jill Stein voters shunned Clinton. At the end of the day, Hillary Clinton was such a polarizing figure that both left and right found reasons to either stay home or vote Republican.

Clinton lost Wisconsin.

The last time Wisconsin voted Republican in a presidential election was 1984; the state voted for Obama in 2008 and 2012. White nationalism had nothing to do with Clinton losing Wisconsin, nor did Russia, “fake” news, or WikiLeaks.

Clinton lost Michigan and Pennsylvania. Michigan and Pennsylvania haven’t voted for a Republican nominee since 1988. Both states chose Obama over Romney and McCain.

White nationalism had nothing to do with Clinton losing Wisconsin, nor did Russia, “fake” news, or WikiLeaks.

Democrats knew they had to win the Electoral College, so any emphasis on the popular vote ignores why Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin voted for Obama, but chose Trump over Clinton.

Ultimately, Democrats picked a candidate who faced two FBI investigations, low favorability ratings, and Clinton Foundation controversies. Democrats would never accuse CNN of “fake” news, therefore let’s evaluate a piece titled FBI boss Comey’s 7 most damning lines on Clinton:

1. “Extremely careless”

“Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

2. “Should have known”

“There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position…should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.”

3. “Especially concerning”

“None of these emails should have been on any kind of unclassified system, but their presence is especially concerning because all of these emails were housed on unclassified personal servers not even supported by full-time security staff, like those found at agencies and departments of the United States government ― or even with a commercial email service like Gmail.”

4. “Still obligated to protect it”

“…even if information is not marked ‘classified’ in an email, participants who know or should know that the subject matter is classified are still obligated to protect it.”

5. “Generally lacking”

While not the focus of our investigation, we also developed evidence that the security culture of the State Department in general, and with respect to use of unclassified email systems in particular, was generally lacking in the kind of care for classified information that is found elsewhere in the government.

6. “Hostile actors”

“We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial email accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal email domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent.”

7. “Sophisticated adversaries”

“She also used her personal email extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related emails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal email account.”Were James Comey’s statements regarding Clinton’s handling of classified information examples of “fake” news? Is it Russia’s fault Hillary Clinton was “extremely careless” with classified data or that “sophisticated adversaries” could have “gained access” to Clinton’s server?

Is it the fault of Julian Assange or WikiLeaks that Defense Secretary Robert Gates believed Russia, China and Iran may have hacked Clinton’s private server?

Were the 22 Top Secret emails on Clinton’s unencrypted server the product of a “fake” news story?

The latest public relations campaign from The Washington Post states that Russia interfered with America’s election. I explain here why the CIA has refused to provide evidence for such claims. Apparently, providing any proof pertaining to Russian hackers would help Russia.

Does this make sense to you?

Senator Angus King states “If you provide proof, you provide a roadmap to show the Russians how we caught them… including intelligence sources and methods.”

Welcome to 1984.

Without any evidence (emails, transcripts, photos, videos, suspects, etc.) the CIA and Washington Post have accused Russia of providing WikiLeaks with hacked emails.

The problem with this theory, aside from the pesky issue of evidence, is that Podesta’s emails involve the actual words of Clinton’s campaign. Essentially, Putin had the audacity to interfere by using Clinton’s own words, and the words of her campaign, against Democrats. Through these words, found within pristine emails in WikiLeaks DNC and Podesta releases, Debbie Wasserman Schultz (and four other DNC officials) resigned from the DNC and Donna Brazile resigned from CNN.

……Don’t blame Russia for influencing our elections without evidence. Hearsay isn’t evidence.

Don’t blame “fake” news for Clinton’s FBI investigation or Anthony Weiner’s laptop.

 

As I stated myself, Russia certainly has the capability to cyber hack, but I guarantee that Hillary’s corruption, and the flood of leaked emails from WikiLeaks,  which showcased the vulgar bigotry and dismissive arrogance, of Podesta, the DNC, Hillary, Hillary’s aides, and the lapdog media, were the catalyst that convinced even undecided voters to reject her.