Diversity: Muzzies Vandalize Churches Across Europe

Via The Geller Report

In Germany, four separate churches were vandalized and/or torched in March alone. “In this country,” PI-News, a German news site, explained, “there is a creeping war against everything that symbolizes Christianity: attacks on mountain-summit crosses, on sacred statues by the wayside, on churches… and recently also on cemeteries.”
In virtually every instance of church attacks, authorities and media obfuscate the identity of the vandals. In those rare instances when the Muslim (or “migrant”) identity of the destroyers is leaked, the desecraters are then presented as suffering from mental health issues.

“Hardly anyone writes and speaks about the increasing attacks on Christian symbols. There is an eloquent silence in both France and Germany about the scandal of the desecrations and the origin of the perpetrators…. Not a word, not even the slightest hint that could in anyway lead to the suspicion of migrants… It is not the perpetrators who are in danger of being ostracized, but those who dare to associate the desecration of Christian symbols with immigrant imports. They are accused of hatred, hate speech and racism.” — PI News, March 24, 2019
In February, vandals desecrated and smashed crosses and statues at Saint-Alain Cathedral in Lavaur, France, and mangled the arms of a statue of a crucified Christ in a mocking manner. In addition, an altar cloth was burned.

Countless churches throughout Western Europe are being vandalized, defecated on, and torched.

In France, two churches are desecrated every day on average. According to PI-News, a German news site, 1,063 attacks on Christian churches or symbols (crucifixes, icons, statues) were registered in France in 2018. This represents a 17% increase compared to the previous year (2017), when 878 attacks were registered — meaning that such attacks are only going from bad to worse.

Among some of the recent desecrations in France, the following took place in just February and March:

Vandals plundered Notre-Dame des Enfants Church in Nîmes and used human excrement to draw a cross there; consecrated bread was found thrown outside among garbage.
The Saint-Nicolas Church in Houilles was vandalized on three separate occasions in February; a 19th century statue of the Virgin Mary, regarded as “irreparable,” was “completely pulverized,” said a clergyman; and a hanging cross was thrown to the floor.

Vandals desecrated and smashed crosses and statues at Saint-Alain Cathedral in Lavaur, and mangled the arms of a statue of a crucified Christ in a mocking manner. In addition, an altar cloth was burned.

Arsonists torched the Church of St. Sulpice in Paris soon after midday mass on Sunday, March 17.

Similar reports are coming out of Germany. Four separate churches were vandalized and/or torched in March alone. “In this country,” PI-News explained, “there is a creeping war against everything that symbolizes Christianity: attacks on mountain-summit crosses, on sacred statues by the wayside, on churches… and recently also on cemeteries.”

Who is primarily behind these ongoing and increasing attacks on churches in Europe? The same German report offers a hint: “Crosses are broken, altars smashed, Bibles set on fire, baptismal fonts overturned, and the church doors smeared with Islamic expressions like ‘Allahu Akbar.’”

Another German report from November 11, 2017 noted that in the Alps and Bavaria alone, around 200 churches were attacked and many crosses broken: “Police are currently dealing with church desecrations again and again. The perpetrators are often youthful rioters with a migration background.” Elsewhere they are described as “young Islamists.”

Sometimes, sadly, in European regions with large Muslim populations, there seems to be a concomitant rise in attacks on churches and Christian symbols. Before Christmas 2016, in the North Rhine-Westphalia region of Germany, where more than a million Muslims reside, some 50 public Christian statues (including those of Jesus) were beheaded and crucifixes broken.

In 2016, following the arrival in Germany of another million mostly Muslim migrants, a local newspaper reported that in the town of Dülmen, “‘not a day goes by’ without attacks on religious statues in the town of less than 50,000 people, and the immediate surrounding area.”

In France it also seems that where the number of Muslim migrants increases, so do attacks on churches. A January 2017 study revealed that, “Islamist extremist attacks on Christians” in France rose by 38 percent, going from 273 attacks in 2015 to 376 in 2016; the majority occurred during Christmas season and “many of the attacks took place in churches and other places of worship.”

As a typical example, in 2014, a Muslim man committed “major acts of vandalism” inside a historic Catholic church in Thonon-les-Bains. According to a report (with pictures) he “overturned and broke two altars, the candelabras and lecterns, destroyed statues, tore down a tabernacle, twisted a massive bronze cross, smashed in a sacristy door and even broke some stained-glass windows.” He also “trampled on” the Eucharist.

For similar examples in other European countries, please see herehereherehere, and here.

In virtually every instance of church attacks, authorities and media obfuscate the identity of the vandals. In those rare instances when the Muslim (or “migrant”) identity of the destroyers is leaked, the perpetrators are then presented as suffering from mental health issues. As the recent PI-News report says:

“Hardly anyone writes and speaks about the increasing attacks on Christian symbols. There is an eloquent silence in both France and Germany about the scandal of the desecrations and the origin of the perpetrators…. Not a word, not even the slightest hint that could in anyway lead to the suspicion of migrants… It is not the perpetrators who are in danger of being ostracized, but those who dare to associate the desecration of Christian symbols with immigrant imports. They are accused of hatred, hate speech and racism.”

 

The entire continent of Europe is saturated with these muzzie thugs, yet the idiots in government keep making excuses and pandering to them.

The rise of Islamic terrorism on the European continent started the day they put out the welcome mat for Haji invaders.

Muzzie animals commit massacres across Germany and have engaged in multiple terrorist attacks in France and Belgium, starting with Charlie Hebdo in January, 2015. Evidently, they haven’t had enough carnage. Instead of preventing these muzzie monsters from entering their region and deporting the rest, they prefer to become eunuchs for the New Caliphate.

Across Europe they murder, rape, and commit acts of terrorism with impunity while citizens who speak out against it are censored, harassed, and prosecuted.

Put a gun to your heads, Euros. It’s faster.

Full (Redacted) Mueller Report Released: President Trump Vindicated, Dems Hysterical

 

 

22 months, 500 witnesses, 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, 500 search warrants, and 2,800 subpoenas later, Mueller confirmed what we already knew: No collusion or obstruction.

 

 

Excerpts from AG William Barr’s statement:

I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election.  As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election.  But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter.  That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.

……again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations.  In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking.

The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet.  The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication.  Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps.  The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts.  Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy.  Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.

Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign.  After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.

So that is the bottom line.  After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes.

……After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

……In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context.  President Trump faced an unprecedented situation.  As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates.  At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability.  Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion.  And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks.  Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims.  And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.

Rush Limbaugh:

……This report could have been issued in one page: We found no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign, period, and we don’t have enough to say that there was any obstruction of justice. You could have done this in one page, maybe two, and be done with it.

……“We cannot exonerate.” That’s not the role of the prosecutor. It’s not the role of any investigator. You can’t exonerate somebody, and they can’t exonerate themselves. That’s why verdicts are guilty and not guilty. Not “not guilty” and innocent. Not “not guilty and exonerated.” There’s no such thing.

 

Time to investigate the real criminals:

The Justice Department inspector general is looking into controversial aspects of the FBI and Justice Department’s investigative decisions and tactics; and a Justice Department prosecutor, Utah U.S. attorney John Huber, has a parallel ongoing investigation.

Moreover, Attorney General Barr has indicated that he will be directing an investigation that focuses, among other things, on the factual predicate that purportedly justified the Obama administration’s highly unusual decision to use foreign counterintelligence authorities (and other investigative powers) to scrutinize a political campaign – a probe that would not be limited to the FBI and Justice Department decision-making but that would assess the actions of, for instance, other intelligence agencies. (Note that  former CIA director John Brennan’s own account, he played a key role in spurring the investigation. To say the least, it is highly unusual for the CIA to enmesh itself in a U.S. political campaign.)

 

Right on cue, the media libtards have a complete meltdown:

How are they going to spin this? When you don’t have the facts or the law on your side, you attack the messenger.

And Hollywood reacted with its usual flair:

Capture2

Capture1

 

For over 2 years the Left put Mueller on a pedestal, hoping that he would fulfill their wet dreams of ‘collusion’ and ‘obstruction’ Now that the report proves neither was found, they’re vilifying him.

You want cover ups, snowflakes?

Here’s what should be investigated:

The Russians gave $35 million to a company with John Podesta on the board.

A fake dossier paid for by one political party and its candidate was used by the government to spy on that candidate’s opponent.

The Obama regime’s FISA abuse in order to get permission to wiretap Trump.

James Comey, who is an unscrupulous douchebag, was part and parcel of the conspiracy to undermine the election and overthrow a duly elected president though false allegations and sedition. He also leaked classified information when it suited his purpose and lied to the FISA court.  He also covered for Hillary and refused to prosecute her for her crimes.

Former CIA director John Brennan, colluded with British and Estonian spies to undermine the election.

Hillary’s Uranium One deal with the Russians that netted her $145 million to her corrupt Clinton Foundation.

Mueller is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. He eagerly participated in a wild goose chase of phantom crimes. He should be investigated, as well.

Bottom line: The investigation was a conspiracy to oust a duly elected President on baseless grounds.

 

 

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/muellers-investigation-of-the-fake-russian-collusion-is-over-trump-vindicated-dems-crushed/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/a-compilation-of-laws-broken-by-the-dems-in-their-campaign-against-president-trump/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/a-compilation-of-laws-broken-by-the-dems-in-their-campaign-against-president-trump/

Related articles:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/here-are-the-10-episodes-mueller-investigated-for-obstruction-of-justice-proving-muellers-investigation-was-a-farce/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-department-releases-redacted-version-of-special-counsels-russia-probe-report

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-barr-spars-reporter-trump-mueller-report

https://www.oann.com/redacted-mueller-report-set-to-be-released/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/18/barr-trump-never-asserted-executive-privilege-mueller-report/

President Trump Considers Giving Liberals All the Illegals They Want by Dumping Them in Their ‘Sanctuary Cities’

Hoity-toity affluent liberals get pretty miffed when their manicured communities are invaded by illegals. The rest of us peons are expected to put up with it.

From Fox News

President Trump responded to reports Friday that his administration proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities by not only confirming the plan but saying it remains under “strong” consideration.
Further, the president tweeted that relocating illegal immigrants to these districts should make the “Radical Left” happy.
The comments came after The Washington Post first reported that the White House proposed sending the detainees to sanctuary cities twice in the last six months. The proposal was first floated in November amid reports of a large migrant caravan from Central America making its way to the southern border. The idea was again considered in February, amid the standoff with Congress over a border wall.

……“Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only,” Trump tweeted.

“The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy—so this should make them very happy!” he continued.

Trump repeated the remarks later at the White House: “We can give them an unlimited supply…let’s see if they have open arms.”

The president doubled down as Democrats fumed over the relocation idea.

 

It’s brilliant. Since the Dems are always bragging about the adoration they have for illegals, then they can have as many as their bleeding hearts desire, right in their own fucking back yards.

Start with dropping them off at Obama’s new house in the Kalorama neighborhood of Washington D.C.

Looks large enough to fit a few dozen at the residence.

Or Nancy Pelosi’s mansion in California:

I bet she could fit some in there, as well.

Pro-illegal alien Chuckie Schumer lives in a fancy apartment at 9 Park West in New York. It’s no mansion , but I bet one of his walk in closets is large enough to house a small number of Mexican illegals.

 

The ‘sanctuary cities‘ thumb their collective noses at the immigration laws, and give illegals taxpayer-funded benefits like food stamps, welfare, free educationtax creditsmedical care, and housing.

It’s time to send the illegal vermin into the wealthy liberals’ neighborhoods by the busloads.

Any libturd who opens their piehole in support of illegals should be required to back up their bullshit by dealing with the consequences.

 

 

Related article:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-strongly-considering-placing-illegal-immigrants-in-sanctuary-cities

Former Obama White House Counsel Indicted for Lying to Investigators About Working for Ukrainian Politicians

From Fox News

Greg Craig, former White House counsel for then-President Barack Obama, was indicted Thursday on two counts of making false and misleading statements to investigators — including Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s team — in connection with his work on behalf of Russia-backed former President of Ukraine Viktor Yanukovych.

More from The Washington Times

Former President Barack Obama’s top White House lawyer was indicted Thursday on two counts of lying to federal investigators about his dealings with a foreign government and former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort.

Gregory B. Craig, who served as White House counsel in 2009 and 2010, is the first prominent Democrat to be ensnared in charges spun out of special counsel Robert Mueller’s probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election.

He will be arraigned Friday afternoon at a Washington federal court.

A federal grand jury in Washington lodged the felony indictment against Mr. Craig for making false statements to Mr. Mueller and the Justice Department’s national security investigators about his lobbying efforts on behalf of Ukraine. The charges carry a maximum penalty of five years in prison.

Federal prosecutors said Mr. Craig should have registered as a foreign agent, saying his contacts with reporters on behalf of a Ukrainian official skirted foreign lobbying laws.

……While at the law firm of Skadden Arps Slate Meagher & Flom in 2012, Mr. Craig was tapped by then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych to write a report justifying the government’s prosecution of former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, a former Yanukovych political rival.

Prosecutors say Mr. Craig failed to register as a lobbyist because he feared it would be revealed that a “private wealthy” Ukrainian paid $4 million for the supposedly independent report, thus damaging its credibility.

If word got out that the report was an effort to whitewash Ms. Tymoshenko’s prosecution, prosecutors said, it would have hurt the ability of Mr. Craig and others at his law firm to go back into government work later.

 

One down, and many more to go.

AG Barr: ‘Spying Occurred Against the Trump Campaign’

This wasn’t merely ‘opposition research’; this was outright crime and sedition.

Via Red State

This isn’t groundbreaking to those of us who’ve been paying attention and aren’t incredibly obtuse, as the evidence has been overwhelming for a while, but it’s a very big (bombshell even) admission to hear AG Barr directly say he believes the Trump campaign was spied on.

While giving public testimony before the Senate today, AG Barr reiterated his intention to investigate the genesis of the 2016 probe into the Trump campaign, which would later morph into the Mueller investigation.

This, of course, didn’t sit well with Democrats, who are all about transparency unless it happens to be investigating why a Presidential campaign was so grossly spied on and investigated with no verified crime nor counter-intelligence evidence of wrongdoing.

Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D – NH) immediately shot back, asserting that AG Barr couldn’t actually be saying what he was saying.

……Barr’s statement is made even more stark by juxtaposing it to the media reaction of the last two years anytime someone mentioned spying on the Trump campaign. We were made to endure years of denials about Trump’s claim of wiretaps because the FBI were actually monitoring cellphones and emails, which you know, is just so much different. It was that kind of obtuse nonsense that has brought on so much frustration. Even today, CNN will call people who mention these details conspiracy theorists because they do not want to admit their narrative was false.

This is a good first step. The IG investigation is going on into this as well, but the IG has no prosecutorial power nor the power to compel testimony or evidence. He’s toothless. AG Barr has the power to do all of that and it’s high time for him to use it.

There was clear impropriety that took place involving unmasking, abuse of intelligence tools, FISA warrants, illegal leaks to the media, and general bias within the FBI/DOJ. These people need to be held accountable. If that happens, we might just prevent this from happening again.

The list of guilty conspirators is long

From Sara Carter

Former FBI Agent Peter Strzok could face ‘serious’ charges for his involvement and actions in the bureau’s probe of Hillary Clinton’s use of a private server to send classified emails, as well as the FBI’s investigation into President Trump’s campaign, multiple sources with knowledge of Strzok’s actions told SaraACarter.com.

Further, sources contend that the nearly year long investigation by DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz, will reveal explosive information and shed light on alleged malfeasance by FBI and DOJ officials directly involved in the Russia investigation. The Inspector General’s report may be completed as early as May or June, according to testimony provided this week by Attorney General William Barr.

 

Here’s what should be investigated:

The Russians gave $35 million to a company with John Podesta on the board.

A fake dossier paid for by one political party and its candidate was used by the government to spy on that candidate’s opponent.

The Obama regime’s FISA abuse in order to get permission to wiretap Trump.

Comey, who is an unscrupulous douchebag, was part and parcel of the conspiracy to undermine the election and overthrow a duly elected president though false allegations and sedition. He also leaked classified information when it suited his purpose and lied to the FISA court.

Former CIA director John Brennan, colluded with British and Estonian spies to undermine the election.

Hillary’s Uranium One deal with the Russians that netted her $145 million to her corrupt Clinton Foundation.

Mueller is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. He eagerly participated in a wild goose chase of phantom crimes. He should be investigated, as well.

The investigation was a conspiracy to oust a duly elected President on baseless grounds.

The leftwing Deep State really didn’t believe Trump would win the election. As an ‘insurance policy‘ during the campaign, the FBI, James Comey, the Hillary campaign, a reprobate former MI6 agent, and the Obama regime all had a hand in producing and paying for a lurid, fabricated dossier which was then used to secure a warrant from the FISA court under fraudulent claims, to spy on the Trump campaign.

Former MI6 operative, Christopher Steele, was hired by Fusion GPS, a corporate espionage firm, to dig up dirt on Trump but came up with a fabricated smear instead. Not deterred by the total implausibility of the story described in the dossier, GPS shopped the dossier to the liberal media and paid journos to feed the fake story to the press with predictable results; the left wing morons at Buzzfeed and  CNN  jumped at the chance to print the fake news.  The FBI even offered $50,000 to Steele for information.

The Obama regime paid almost one million dollars to the same law firm that funneled money to GPS.  Somewhere in that mess is RINO John McCain,  who received the dossier from a former British ambassador to Moscow.

Glenn Simpson, GPS co-founder,  was questioned in a closed door hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The Mueller clusterfuck is two fold: The fake dossier was tried and failed, then they used the planted story about the Trump campaign having inside knowledge of the Russians possessing Hillary’s emails.  They also inserted a mole into the Trump campaign.

Comey, McCabe, Strzok, Obama, Lynch, Hillary, and Brennan, should be fitted for orange jumpsuits.

 

 

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/12/17/christopher-steele-admits-he-was-hired-by-hillary-to-challenge-results-of-the-2016-presidential-election-in-case-trump-won/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/andrew-mccarthy-on-dem-campaign-corruption-in-politicized-justice-desperate-times-call-for-disparate-measures/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/02/13/the-craptastic-corruption-behind-the-dem-cabals-investigation-of-donald-trump/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/10/20/doj-documents-further-proof-that-comey-lied-to-fisa-court-and-used-fake-dossier-to-target-trump-contradicts-strzoks-denials-that-he-had-nothing-to-do-with-fisa-warrant/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/a-compilation-of-laws-broken-by-the-dems-in-their-campaign-against-president-trump/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/05/19/wapo-identifies-fbi-spy-who-infiltrated-trump-campaign-as-retired-professor/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/muellers-investigation-of-the-fake-russian-collusion-is-over-trump-vindicated-dems-crushed/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/07/05/the-full-extent-of-strzoks-corruption-in-the-2016-campaign-outlined-in-the-ig-report/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/06/15/comeys-elaborate-crossfire-hurricane-mission-to-dig-up-dirt-on-trump/