Quote of The Day: Dinesh D’Souza on Ignorance

Judicial Insanity: Dallas Man Charged With Inducing Eichenwald’s Seizure Over the Internet



Newsweek senior writer Kurt Eichenwald threatened legal action Friday against a Twitter user he accused of causing him to have an epileptic seizure.

Mr. Eichenwald, 55, said he’s taking time off from social media in order to concentrate on suing over a supposed seizure-spurring tweet he received Thursday evening.

“Last night, for the second time, a deplorable aware I have epilepsy tweeted a strobe at me with the message “you deserve a seizure’ on it,” Mr. Eichenwald wrote to his Twitter followers on Friday. “It worked.”

“All I will be tweeting for the next few days are copies of documents from the litigation, police reports etc. Once we have the lawsuit filed, we will be subpoenaing Twitter for the identity of the individual who engaged in this cross-state assault,” he added.

The Twitter user behind Thursday’s tweet, “@jew_goldstein,” has since been suspended from the website.

While aggressively covering Donald Trump’s presidential campaign for Newsweek, Mr. Eichenwald announced in October that he nearly had a mild epileptic episode after a Twitter user purposely sent him a video containing flashing images. Now in the wake of the second such incident in as many months, the reporter insisted this week that he’ll be pursuing legal action over the most recent stunt.

He nearly had a mild episode?

Believe it or not, the prankster was arrested by the fucking FBI.

John Rayne Rivello, 29, of Salisbury, Maryland was arrested this morning on a criminal complaint filed in filed in the Northern District of Texas. Rivello was arrested for tweeting a strobe light .gif at the journalist Kurt Eichenwald, triggering a seizure.

As part of a search warrant, the FBI found direct messages Rivello sent to other Twitter users saying “I hope this sends him into a seizure,” “Spammed this at [victim] let’s see if he dies,” and “I know he has epilepsy.” 

First of all, Eichenwald is a certified nutcase. His rambling, bat-shit crazy rant during an interview with Tucker Carlson is a classic study of a mental breakdown.

Eichenwald claimed to be in communication from someone at the CIA who gave him ‘secret messages’ about Trump, and the conversation fell apart from there.  That’s when he also claimed to have had an epileptic seizure brought on by criticism on Twitter after the interview.

Eichenwald has loose screws that need to be tightened with a pharmaceutical wrench.

I fired this message off to the Dallas DA:

So, John Rivello is being charged with “with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon” because he posted a Tweet to idiot Kurt Eichenwald, which supposedly gave him a ‘seizure’? Seriously?? Hey, my blood pressure goes sky high whenever I read or hear of such ridiculous waste of taxpayers’ money, and come to think of it, the daily stupidity of libtards really gets my blood boiling too. Is there any statute in your legal repertoire to provide legal recourse? If you’re going to use your official capacity to pander to the hurt feelings of ‘triggered’ liberal snowflakes, the justice system is in sorry shape.


Related article:

Congressional Testimony: Comey Tap Dances, Denies Wiretaps


Bottom line: The main purpose was to dig for any “evidence” of collusion between Trump’s campaign and the Russians. Obama used wiretaps for that purpose.  They found no wrong doing, and won’t admit to the wiretaps or the lack of evidence.

Over eight years of his regime, Obama was pretty prolific with the wiretaps. 

James Comey got grilled in front of Congress over the entire Russian/wiretap disaster, and did a dance that put Fred Astaire to shame.

From The Washington Times

FBI Director James Comey declined to say Monday whether his team has launched an investigation into the leaks that led to former White House national security advisor Mike Flynn’s ouster.

Comey was pressed by Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., to say whether he could confirm such an investigation is taking place, but Comey said he could not because it might confirm that classified information was leaked.

“I can’t, but I hope people watching know how seriously we take leaks of classified information,” he said during Monday’s hearing on Russia’s influence on the election. “But I don’t want to confirm it by saying that we’re investigating it.”

Flynn was fired following leaks of intercepted phone calls with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak. The leaks showed that Flynn had discussed the sanctions imposed on Russia by then-President Barack Obama in retaliation for Russia’s cyberattacks during the 2016 election — a revelation contrary to Flynn’s public statements and his statements to Vice President Mike Pence.

……Gowdy, a former federal prosecutor, pushed for information about who might have known about Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador. Comey refused to say if he briefed Obama on the phone calls, although he confirmed that former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former acting Attorney General Sally Yates — whom Trump fired for refusing to enforce his immigration executive order — would have had access to the information.


Comey was asked by House Armed Services committee member, Congressman Mike Turner (R-OH) if Obama was briefed on spying done against Mike Flynn or anyone else in the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, the scandal known as Obamagate.

Rep. Mike Turner: “Did [former Obama national intelligence director James Clapper] director Clapper ever brief the President of the United States — then President Obama — concerning the possible inadvertent or incidental collection or interception by the US intelligence community of any communication of members of the incoming Trump administration?”

FBI director James Comey: “That’s not something I can comment on.

Mike Turner: “And then why not, Mr. Comey?”

James Comey: “For a couple of reasons. It might involve classified information or might involve communications with the President of the United States. On both of those grounds, I can’t talk about it here.”

Turner: “Mr. Comey, have you previously discussed your conversations with President Obama with this committee?”

Comey: “I don’t remember. I may have with the chair in ranking — I don’t remember with the full committee.”

Turner: “We’ll have to refresh your memory on those conversations then, Mr. Comey.”

Trey Gowdy pressed Comey to come clean:

Rep. Trey Gowdy, questioning James Comey during a House Intelligence Committee hearing on Monday, appeared to name former President Barack Obama and six of his administration’s top staffers as the source of leaks regarding former National Security Advisor Michael Flynn’s alleged collusion with the Russian government during the 2016 election.

Gowdy asked if those 6 people – DNI James Clapper, CIA Director James Brennan, former National Security Advisor Susan Rice, former White House advisor Ben Rhodes, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch and former acting Attorney General Sally Yates – “knew the name of the U.S. citizen that appeared in The New York Times and Washington Post? Would he [she] have access to an unmasked name?”

His point was that only a limited number of people would have the information that was leaked to the media.

So the question is which of those limited number of people did it?

Gowdy also asked Comey if he had briefed President Obama on any calls involving Michael Flynn.

Comey refused to answer the question, saying, “I’m not going to go get into either that case or any conversations I had with the president,” Comey answered.

Why not? The President is not supposed to be inserting himself in any criminal investigation, that would be considered improper.

This is the same douche who covered Hillary’s ass, and said she should not be prosecuted despite the fact that she used an illegal, unsecure computer to store and transmit highly classified information, and actually gave them to her aides, who had no security clearances.  Comey is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. His attitude reflects the approach of an out of control federal government. He needs to be kicked out.

By the way, after the Dems made the accusation of Russian hacking, they refused to let the FBI look into their servers:

Trump also tweeted in January about the DNC not allowing the FBI access to its computers after complaining that they were hacked by Russia.

“The Democratic National Committee would not allow the FBI to study or see its computer info after it was supposedly hacked by Russia,” Trump said. “So how and why are they so sure about hacking if they never even requested an examination of the computer servers? What is going on?”

The FBI confirmed Trump’s claim in January, according to the Star Tribune.

“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated,” the agency said. “This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier.”

“I mean, if you look at the Obama administration and the Clintons’ involvement with Russia in terms of donations the Clintons received from Russia and entities, the idea that they sold off a tremendous amount of the uranium to the Russian government, and yet where was the concern for that? What are we doing to look into that?” Spicer said Monday.

“It was the Obama administration in 2009 that talked about a reset with Russia and a desire to reset relationships. It was Hillary Clinton who signed off on the deal that gave a Russian company one-fifth of the U.S. uranium supply. Where is the questioning about that? What did they get?” he asked.

”There was discussion the other day about a Russian official noting that both campaigns they sought to do it — where is the concern about their efforts on the Hillary Clinton thing? The Democrats and the Democratic Party, and a lot of those individuals are quick to point fingers, and yet when it comes to discussing their own collusion or questions involving their involvement with Russian officials or buy-offs to the Russians, there’s no discussion there. So you’ve got to wonder, on both sides, where’s the parity when it comes to these kinds of investigations?” Spicer asked.

The Dems have  a lot of explaining to do.

From Angelo M. Codevilla, who was on the staff of the Senate Intelligence Committee as FISA was being written:

Fast-forward 44 years. In October, as opposition presidential candidate Donald Trump was surging in the polls, U.S. intelligence officials broke into his communications. But this time they had warrants. Approval, if not instigation, for seeking them had to come from the highest levels of the administration. One seems to have been obtained on the basis of a specious claim that the real targets were Russians, not Americans. But the other apparently aimed squarely at alleged contacts between Mr. Trump’s electronic communications system and Russians. It is difficult to imagine what threats to national security, supported by “probable cause,” these warrant requests might have alleged that could have outweighed the obvious fact that preventing the opposition candidate’s election was the point of the penetration. By legalizing precisely the same thing that the Watergate burglars had done — a political crime of the highest order — these warrants changed American politics.


Related articles:




Obama Used Former British Spy to Get Surveillance on Trump

From Politistick

A blockbuster report by FOX News Senior Judicial Analyst Judge Andrew Napolitano on Tuesday states that the Obama regime used British spies to get surveillance on then President-elect Donald Trump as a way to cover his footprints, according to three intel sources.
……Judge Napolitano dropped this bombshell:

“Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA. He didn’t use the CIA. He didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use Department of Justice. He used GCHQ.
That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database. So by simply having two people go to them saying, ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving candidate Trump, conversations involving president-elect Trump,’ he’s able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”

The former British spy who colluded with Obama is Christopher Steele, who concocted the fake dossier that supposedly contained compromising information about Trump.


At the bottom of this cesspool is B. Hussein Obama, who engaged in wiretaps and sedition.

Jeff Sessions needs to do his job.


Hillary Ally McAuliffe Gave $675,000 to Wife of FBI Agent Involved in Email Investigation

More Clinton corruption.

From the NY Post

Virginia Gov. Terry McAuliffe, a longtime Clinton confidant, helped steer $675,000 to the election campaign of the wife of an FBI official who went on to lead the probe into Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email system, according to a report.

The political action committee of McAuliffe, the Clinton loyalist, gave $467,500 to the state Senate campaign of the wife of Andrew McCabe, who is now deputy director of the FBI, according to the Wall Street Journal.

The report states Jill McCabe received an additional $207,788 from the Virginia Democratic Party, which is heavily influenced by McAuliffe.

The money directed by McAuliffe began flowing two months after the FBI investigation into Clinton began in July 2015. Around that time, the candidate’s husband was promoted from running the Washington field office for the FBI to the No. 3 position at the bureau.

Within a year, McCabe was promoted to deputy director, the second-highest position in the bureau.

In a statement to the Journal, the FBI said McCabe “played no role, attended no events, and did not participate in fundraising or support of any kind. Months after the completion of her campaign, then-Associate Deputy Director McCabe was promoted to Deputy, where, in that position, he assumed for the first time, an oversight role in the investigation into Secretary Clinton’s emails.”

Notice how the FBI ignores the blatant conflict of interest.

The governor’s office claimed the FBI’s McCabe met the governor only once — on March 7, 2015, when McAuliffe persuaded Jill McCabe to run.

The 2015 Virginia state Senate run — her first attempt to gain public office — was unsuccessful as she lost to the incumbent Republican.

McAuliffe “supported Jill McCabe because he believed she would be a good state senator. This is a customary practice for Virginia governors … Any insinuation that his support was tied to anything other than his desire to elect candidates who would help pass his agenda is ridiculous,” a spokesman for the Virginia governor told the Journal.

McAuliffe has been a longtime backer of the Clintons, even serving as Hillary Clinton’s campaign chair in 2008.

The FBI is still covering for Hillary and her accomplices. Note to James Comey: She lost. You can prosecute now. Better yet, it’s time for Trump to fire your ass.

Related posts: