Archive for the ‘The Media’ Category

While the Media Panders to Muzzie Extremists, Christians Are Being Slaughtered Worldwide

The liberal media cries over the shooting of muzzies in New Zealand, ignoring the millions of Christians who are being subjected to genocide.

This shit goes on every day, but the liberal media sides with the worst excrement on the planet because of their feckless hatred of Western values.

Via Reuters:

About 100 million Christians are persecuted around the world, with conditions worsening for them most rapidly in Syria and Ethiopia, according to an annual report by a group supporting oppressed Christians worldwide.

Open Doors, a non-denominational Christian group, listed North Korea, Saudi Arabia and Afghanistan as the three toughest countries for Christians last year. They topped the 50-country ranking for 2011 as well.

Syria jumped from 36th to 11th place on the list as its Christian minority, first suspected by rebels of close ties to the Assad government, has increasingly become a target for radical Islamist fighters, the report said.

Ethiopia, which is two-thirds Christian, shot up from 38th to 15th place in the ranking due to a “complex mix of persecution dynamics” including attacks by radical Islamists and reprisals by traditional Christians against new Protestant movements.

Mali came from no listing for 2011 to 7th place because the sharia rule the Islamist Ansar Dine group imposed on the north of the country not only brought harsh punishments for the Muslim majority but also drove the tiny Christian minority, it said.

“There are over 65 countries where Christians are persecuted,” said the report released on Tuesday by Open Doors, which began in the 1950s smuggling Bibles into communist states and now works in more than 60 countries.

“An estimated 100 million Christians worldwide are persecuted,” the United States-based group said in the report. All but one of the 50 countries in the list – Colombia, which ranked 46th – were in Africa, Asia or the Middle East.

Christianity is the largest and most widely spread faith in the world, with 2.2 billion followers or 32 percent of the world population, according to a report by the Washington-based Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.

It faces restrictions and hostility in 111 countries around the world, ahead of the 90 countries limiting or harassing the second-largest faith, Islam, another Pew report said.

“In recent years, we’ve been hearing that Christianity is the most persecuted religion in the world – that sounds right to us,” said Open Doors France director Michel Varton at a presentation of the report in Strasbourg.

 

After the shooting in New Zealand , the media paraded CAIR in front of the cameras as if they’re martyrs. CAIR was founded in 1994 by three leaders of the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) — Nihad Awad, Omar Ahmad, and Rafeeq Jaber, and funded by the Holy Land Foundation for Relief, a designated terrorist organization. Mousa Abu Marzook, the current deputy political chief of Hamas, served on the board of directors. They fund Hamas and their parent organization is the Muslim Brotherhood.  Their function as a terrorist operative  is well documented. They didn’t have to disclose their donors. The Muslim Brotherhood has even formed its own U.S.-based political party.

With the spread of Islamic muzzie atrocities, Christians are being slaughtered and driven out of their own homelands.  The world stands by and does nothing. They’ve been slaughtering Christians wholesale across the Middle EastIndonesia, and in Africa. And the world yawns.

Over 6000 Nigerian Christians were murdered by Fulani radicals.

 

Boko Haram attacks Christian villages and burns churches to the ground. His muzzie terrorist thugs have amassed quite a body count for Allah.

Christians in Iraq are being killed by the bushel.

Christians throughout the Middle East face widespread genocide.

The leftwingnuts in the political arena and the media blame the victims of Islamic violence for ‘provoking’ muslim ‘sensibilities’.

The Left is predisposed to hate patriotism and freedom. It’s in their DNA.  They’ll shit themselves over killing the enemy that drew blood on this soil, but Christians, Jews, and the multitude of other victims of the ‘peaceful religion of Islam’ are politically and morally expendable.

Those who speak out are quickly silenced by the social media and main stream media thought police. Laura Loomer was banned by Fox News for criticizing their cooperation with CAIR when Jeanine Pirro was penalized for specking the truth about the symbolism of the hijab.

Muzzie animals hang people, throw them off buildings, behead them, set them on fire, and commit mass bombings, but if we fight back we’re the problem.  If liberals reacted as much toward the muslim threat as they do perceived ‘Islamophobia’, this world would be a safer place.

 

 

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/muslims-are-not-moderate/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2012/12/24/middle-east-islamofascism-militant-muzzies-target-christians-egypt-under-sharia-law/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2015/02/24/fox-news-host-hits-back-at-holder-21-coptic-christians-beheaded-45-people-burned-alive-yet-fox-is-the-problem/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2012/08/19/middle-east-muzzies-rattle-sabers-attack-media-crucify-opponents/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2012/07/11/muzzie-group-declares-wipe-christianity-from-the-face-of-the-earth/

 

Related articles:

https://www.persecution.org/2019/03/14/boko-haram-attacks-christian-village-destroys-church/

http://www.israelislamandendtimes.com/muslim-extremists-murder-over-30-nigerian-christians-in-devastating-attack/

https://www.hudson.org/research/14499-anti-christian-slaughter-escalates-in-nigeria

Fox News Bans Laura Loomer for Criticizing Their Cooperation With Terrorist Organization CAIR Over Jeanine Pirro

Via Laura Loomer

“We do not negotiate with terrorists” used to be a unanimous position held by both sides of the political area in America, but sadly, Fox News is objecting and has indeed negotiated with terrorists in their crusade against free speech and honest dialog about Islam in America.

Fox News was a hot topic of discussion this week after the radical Left and their Muslim Brotherhood counterparts decided to carry out their own form of jihad against Judge Jeanine Pirro, one of Fox News’s most popular hosts. On Saturday evening during her opening statement, Pirro sparked controversy after she logically questioned whether or not Ilhan Omar’s use of the hijab suggests that she is in favor of Sharia Law.

“She’s not getting this anti-Israel sentiment doctrine from the Democrat party. So if it’s not rooted in the party, where is she getting it from? Think about it,” Pirro said. “Omar wears a hijab, which, according to the Quran 33:59, tells women to cover so they won’t get molested. Is her adherence to this Islamic doctrine indicative of her adherence to Sharia law, which in itself is antithetical to the United States Constitution?”

In case you were wondering whether or not wearing an hijab means one is pro-Sharia, the answer is yes.

According to Islamic law, devout Muslim women are to cover themselves, or face punishment for violations of Sharia Law.

Despite the claims of many Muslim women that it is “their choice” to wear a hijab, the truth of the matter is that according to Sharia —the “Sacred Path of Islam”, wearing head coverings for women is  “Obligatory” in most of the Muslim world.

In Chapter “w” Section 23 of “Reliance of the Traveller”—the sharia manual for Muslims, it states that the hijab is obligatory under Sharia. “A woman must not reveal anything except her hands and her face when outside the home and on the street.”

In other words, Pirro was speaking the truth and nothing but the truth.

Following the segment, the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) wrote a letter to Fox News, calling for Pirro to be fired for what they called “Islamophobia”.

……A phobia is defined as an irrational fear.

Is it irrational to fear those who want to kill you? No, it is not.

As stated in Chapter 9 verse 5 of the Quran, “And when the sacred months have passed, then kill the polytheists wherever you find them and capture them and besiege them and sit in wait for them at every place of ambush.”

The Quran, which is the leading text in Islam, explicitly calls for the killing of non-Muslims.

It is entirely normal and rational to fear someone or something that openly states they want to murder you.

But, Fox News clearly is more scared of being labeled as “Islamophobic” than using logic and facts to dismiss CAIR.

CAIR, which describes itself as a “the nation’s largest Muslim civil rights organization”, is nothing but an Islamic terrorist organization. CAIR is HAMAS.

But, don’t take it from me, take it from Fox News, which decided to side with CAIR all why knowing that CAIR is a terrorist organization.

……Over the years, Fox News has published several reports about CAIR, documenting the fact that the group is a dangerous Islamic terrorist organization that even the FBI decided to cut ties with them.

……Fox News now wants to pretend like they never published these reports as they throw Pirro under the bus and assist in CAIR’s jihad against free speech and critics of Sharia.

Pirro’s segment was critical of Ilhan Omar, and asked the question as to whether or not the Congresswoman is pro-Sharia.

It is worth noting that in August 2018, Omar was asked on camera to condemn HAMAS, and she refused.

……Being in favor of an Islamic terrorist organization like HAMAS and ISIS logically means that one is pro-Sharia, given that Sharia Law is Islamic Law, which is the doctrine followed by these Islamic terrorist organizations, both of which Omar has refused to condemn and herself has shown sympathy towards.

But, don’t take it from me. Take it from Fox News, which itself has said these same things. On February 16, 2019, Fox News published an article detailing how Omar’s district in Minneapolis, Minnesota is now the ISIS terrorist recruitment capitol of the world. Omar herself is Somali and wrote a letter to a judge to show leniency toward a group of Minnesota men accused of trying to join the Islamic State terror group.

 

You would think that a conservative-leaning network like Fox would realize that the scrutiny of Islam, especially after 9/11 and the subsequent attacks on American soil, is not only sane and reasonable, but part of national security.

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran . . . should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”

—CAIR Chairman Omar M. Ahmad to a crowd of California Muslims in July 1998

CAIR was founded in 1994 by three leaders of the Islamic Association for Palestine (IAP) — Nihad Awad, Omar Ahmad, and Rafeeq Jaber, and funded by the Holy Land Foundation for Relief, a designated terrorist organization. Mousa Abu Marzook, the current deputy political chief of Hamas, served on the board of directors. They fund Hamas and their parent organization is the Muslim Brotherhood.  Their function as a terrorist operative  is well documented. They didn’t have to disclose their donors. The Muslim Brotherhood has even formed its own U.S.-based political party.

Islam is diametrically opposed to every Constitutional principle on which this country was founded. Under the muzzie point of view, Sharia law trumps all other laws. It’s meant to overtake and replace all Western civil, criminal, and government jurisdiction. The founding principles of this country did not hinge on a violent ideological theocracy that advocated the deaths of those who didn’t hold the same religious beliefs.  Letting them thrive here is suicidal.

 

Related post:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2015/12/10/to-the-left-and-your-media-hacks-there-are-valid-reasons-to-stop-muzzie-immigration/

Facebook Bans Links to Zerohedge

“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.”

—Voltaire

Zuck’s community standards are violated when you express an opinion that isn’t leftwing.

Via Zerohedge

Over the weekend, we were surprised to learn that some readers were prevented by Facebook when attempting to share Zero Hedge articles. Subsequently it emerged that virtually every attempt to share or merely mention an article, including in private messages, would be actively blocked by the world’s largest social network, with the explanation that “the link you tried to visit goes against our community standards.”

We were especially surprised by this action as neither prior to this seemingly arbitrary act of censorship, nor since, were we contacted by Facebook with an explanation of what “community standard” had been violated or what particular filter or article had triggered the blanket rejection of all Zero Hedge content.

To be sure, as a for-profit enterprise with its own unique set of corporate “ethics”, Facebook has every right to impose whatever filters it desires on the media shared on its platform. It is entirely possible that one or more posts was flagged by Facebook’s “triggered” readers who merely alerted a censorship algo which blocked all content.

Alternatively, it is just as possible that Facebook simply decided to no longer allow its users to share our content in retaliation for our extensive coverage of what some have dubbed the platform’s “many problems”, including chronic privacy violations, mass abandonment by younger users, its gross and ongoing misrepresentation of fake users, ironically – in retrospect – its systematic censorship  and back door government cooperation (those are just links from the past few weeks).

Unfortunately, as noted above, we still don’t know what event precipitated this censorship, and any attempts to get feedback from the company with the $500 billion market cap, have so far remained unanswered.

We would welcome this opportunity to engage Facebook in a constructive dialog over the company’s decision to impose a blanket ban on Zero Hedge content. Alternatively, we will probably not lose much sleep if that fails to occur: unlike other websites, we are lucky in that only a tiny fraction of our inbound traffic originates at Facebook, with most of our readers arriving here directly without the aid of search engines (Google banned us from its News platform, for reasons still unknown, shortly after the Trump victory) or referrals.

That said, with Facebook increasingly under political, regulatory and market scrutiny for its arbitrary internal decisions on what content to promote and what to snuff, its ever declining user engagement, and its soaring content surveillance costs, such censorship is hardly evidence of the platform’s “openness” to discourse, its advocacy of free speech, or its willingness to listen to and encourage non-mainstream opinions, even if such “discourse” takes place in some fake user “click farm” somewhere in Calcutta.

More:

Facebook’s staff  is manipulative, unethical, dishonest, and leftwing.  (Who didn’t know this?)  Its reputation for censoring viewpoints it doesn’t like, is well documented.

Conservative sites have been suspended over Zuckerberg’s political preferences, but leftie blogs and muzzie pro-terrorist Facebook pages and posts are relatively unscathed. Case in point: Conservative pundit Paul Joseph Watson got death threats from a muzzie Facebook page, but according to Facebook it ‘doesn’t violate community standards’.

Lauren Southern, a conservative commentator, was banned from Facebook for 30 days because she posted a comment that criticized the left-leaning hierarchy’s habit of censoring opposing viewpoints. The irony is lost on The Zuck.

They’ve censored much of what I try to post from my blog.

If you’re going to have a site that supports your opinions, fine.  Just don’t claim to be ‘neutral’ and don’t bother with the façade of “community standards”.

I have joined GAB, where opinions can be freely expressed without censorship. I suggest you do the same if you’re fed up with the bullshit. I’m going to be off Facebook for awhile.  I don’t know if I’ll be back on Zuck’s site any time soon.

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/04/09/facebooks-purge-of-conservative-sites-reaches-stalinesque-proportions/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/facebook-insider-leaks-docs-on-political-targeting-of-conservatives/

Facebook Insider Leaks Docs on Political Targeting of Conservatives

From Project Veritas

Project Veritas has obtained and published documents and presentation materials from a former Facebook insider. This information describes how Facebook engineers plan and go about policing political speech. Screenshots from a Facebook workstation show the specific technical actions taken against political figures, as well as “[e]xisting strategies” taken to combat political speech.

To gain a better understanding of the documents, Project Veritas spoke with the Facebook insider in an interview. The insider separated from Facebook in 2018 and was later hired by Project Veritas.

According to the insider, the documents revealed a routine suppression of the distribution of conservative Facebook pages. The technical action she repeatedly saw, and for which Project Veritas was provided documentation, was labeled ActionDeboostLiveDistribution. Said the insider, “I would see [this term] appear on several different conservative pages. I first noticed it with an account that I can’t remember, but I remember once I started looking at it, I also saw it on Mike Cernovich’s page, saw it on Steven Crowder’s page, as well as the Daily Caller’s page.”

……A screenshot of an action log on Mike Cernovich’s Facebook page provided by the insider, shows the tag. The insider believes that the “deboost” code suppresses the distribution of livestream videos on Facebook. Project Veritas spoke to a current Facebook employee off the record who said that the code could limit a video’s visibility in news feeds, remove sharing features, and disable interactive notifications.

When approached for comment, author and filmmaker Mike Cernovich said the troubling issue is that Facebook could just “make stuff up” about people through these systems. “Facebook, or an individual at Facebook, has the unilateral power to create false allegations against someone he or she doesn’t like. The person accused not only can’t do anything about the allegation, they don’t even have an idea the allegation was made,” said Cernovich.

……Upon further review, the insider says she did not notice the tag on any left-wing pages. “I looked at the Young Turks’ page, I looked at Colin Kaepernick’s page, none of them had received the same deboost comment.”

……Also in the in the documents was a presentation, authored by Facebook engineers Seiji Yamamoto and Eduardo Arino de la Rubia, titled “Coordinating Trolling on FB.” Yamamoto is a Data Science Manager, and de la Rubia is a Chief Data Scientist at Facebook. The presentation appears to describe the current actions, as well as potential future actions, Facebook can take to combat alleged abusive behavior on the platform.

Yamamoto, who is responsible for “News Feed Reduction Strategy,” also authored a post where he said Facebook should address “…quite a bit of content near the perimeter of hate speech.” Said the Facebook insider, the “perimeter of hate speech” means “things that aren’t actually hate speech but that might offend somebody. Anything that is perceived as hateful but no court would define it as hate speech.”

The insider believes Yamamoto’s plans appears to be political in nature, rather than in response to abusive behaviors, “[i]t was clearly kind of designed… aimed to be the right wing meme culture that’s become extremely prevalent in the past few years. And some of the words that appeared on there were, using words like SJW… MSM… the New York Times doesn’t talk about the MSM. The independent conservative outlets are using that language.”

Also in Yamamoto’s report was a line appearing to say that online Facebook trolls are involved in “destructive behaviors” such as “[r]ed-pilling normies to convert them to their worldview.”

……On a page from the presentation titled “Strategies we use today,” Yamamoto and de la Rubia list “demote bad content.” They add, “… we should still of course delete and demote, but we can do even more…”

……Two of the “tactics” outlined in the presentation that the Facebook engineers propose for dealing with “troll operations” involve the introduction of a “Troll Twilight Zone.”

Yamamoto and de la Rubia’s presentation says that “troll accounts,” can have their internet bandwidth limited and experience forced glitches like frequent “auto-logout[s]” and the failed upload of comments. These “special features” would be triggered “leading up to important elections.”

Facebook could identify trolls by their vocabulary, friend network, and behavior, according to the presentation. “Facebook has what’s called a Fake Account Index,” explained the insider, “where they assign a score which helps them determine whether the account is a real person or just a dummy spam account. And rightfully so, they want to delete those accounts, that’s okay. They created the troll score so they could help identify, using words they would post, pictures, if they were friends with other trolls and then using that to determine whether this person should be on the platform or not.”

The insider thinks that Facebook’s system to score trolls is problematic because, “there’s no accountability and especially when they are using machine learning to do this, whenever an individual actions an account, there is a process where at least you can send a message to Facebook… However, this is all being done without the user’s knowledge, there is no recourse for them.”

……The insider was terminated by Facebook shortly after Project Veritas published undercover video of Twitter employees discussing “shadow banning” and other data privacy abuses. When asked if supplying documents and testimony to Project Veritas was “worth it,” the insider said “Yes… I knew what I had seen… this is something they were trying to keep in the shadows, that they did not want to public to know and yet the public has a right to know.”

Project Veritas founder James O’Keefe believes that “our collective future depends on those who are willing to give up everything for what they believe.” He believes that if more insiders from large companies step forward and expose similar dishonesty and wrongdoing, that the country will be better educated.

 

View the documents here.

 

O’Keefe confronts two of the Facebook censors, who don’t like to be called out for their bullshit:

 

 

Facebook’s staff  is manipulative, unethical, dishonest, and leftwing.  (Who didn’t know this?)  Its reputation for censoring viewpoints it doesn’t like, is well documented.

Conservative sites have been suspended over Zuckerberg’s political preferences, but leftie blogs and muzzie pro-terrorist Facebook pages and posts are relatively unscathed. Case in point: Conservative pundit Paul Joseph Watson got death threats from a muzzie Facebook page, but according to Facebook it ‘doesn’t violate community standards’.

Lauren Southern, a conservative commentator, was banned from Facebook for 30 days because she posted a comment that criticized the left-leaning hierarchy’s habit of censoring opposing viewpoints. The irony is lost on The Zuck.

If you’re going to have a site that supports your opinions, fine.  Just don’t claim to be ‘neutral’ and don’t bother with the façade of “community standards”.

The same thing has happened to me.  I’m being flat-out censored by the Facebook nazis. Every time I try to post something from my blog, I get these ‘error’ messages.

 

Their ‘support’ refuses to give an explanation. I have joined GAB, where opinions can be freely expressed without censorship. I suggest you do the same if you’re fed up with the bullshit. I’m going to be off Facebook for awhile.  I don’t know if I’ll be back on Zuck’s site any time soon.

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/04/09/facebooks-purge-of-conservative-sites-reaches-stalinesque-proportions/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/05/22/facebook-censorship-selective-hypocritical-arbitrary-biased-community-standards/

President Trump Declares National Emergency on Border, Gives CNN Hack Acosta a Swift Kick in the Ass Over His ‘Concocting an Emergency’ Question

President Trump did what he had to do to obtain funds for border security.

Via Fox News

President Trump said Friday he is declaring a national emergency on the southern border, tapping into executive powers in a bid to divert billions toward construction of a wall even as he plans to sign a funding package that includes just $1.4 billion for border security.

“We’re going to confront the national security crisis on our southern border … one way or the other, we have to do it,” Trump said in the Rose Garden.

The move is expected to face a swift and forceful legal challenge that could stall the attempt in the courts for the near future. But the declaration and other money-moving plans allow Trump to continue to fight for border wall construction while also averting another partial government shutdown — which would have been triggered at midnight absent the new funding package.

Trump, in the Rose Garden, declared once again that “walls work” as he confirmed he’ll sign the emergency declaration.

“We’re talking about an invasion of our country,” Trump said.

And in an almost-casual tone, the president predicted a legal fight that will wind up before the Supreme Court.

“We will have a national emergency, and we will then be sued,” Trump said, adding that the federal appeals courts could well rule against his administration. “Then we’ll end up in the Supreme Court, and hopefully we’ll get a fair shake, and we’ll win at the Supreme Court — just like the [travel] ban.”

 

During the press conference, CNN’s chattering twat Jim Acosta, reared his ugly head and asked: “What do you say to critics who say that you are creating a national emergency? That you’re concocting a national emergency here to get your wall”?

The response was swift and brutal:

Trump pointed to angel moms in attendance, asking them for their thoughts.

“You think I’m creating something? Ask these incredible women who lost their daughters and their sons,” Trump said. “OK, Because your question is a very political question because you have an agenda. You’re CNN. You’re fake news.”

Trump told Acosta the statistics he provided were “wrong” and told him to take a look at the federal prison population for proof.

“See how many of them, percentage-wise, are illegal aliens,” Trump said. “Just see, go ahead and see. It’s a fake question.”

……Acosta was subsequently confronted by the angel moms in attendance, after the press conference. As angel moms confronted the CNN reporter, he invited them to appear on the network in the background of a live shot.

.…..An angel mom then discussed that a previously deported illegal alien murdered her son.

“President Trump is completely correct on this issue, we need to protect this country,” the angel mom told Acosta.

 

 

Leftwing media and its tools have one focus for the entire length of Trump’s term: to oppose everything he does, no matter how constructive his efforts and no matter how far into the gutter they reach.

Liberal cesspools like California have welcomed the flood of illegals and it’s taken a big toll.

Hundreds of crimes are committed by these dregs. Cop killers, rapists, child molesters,murderers, thieves, robbers, gangs (MS13s), and a slew of other human garbage are coming into this country illegally and committing more felonies once they get in.

Families of the victims of illegals have testified before Congress and called for an end to the ‘sanctuary city’ insanity, but the Dem assholes keep protecting illegal aliens instead of obeying the law and protecting American citizens.

The cost of illegal aliens taking American lives is memorialized here: http://www.ojjpac.org/memorial.asp

The U.S. has the right to control who enters the country. There is no Constitutional or legal right for a foreigner to enter the U.S.  It’s a privilege. Every country has immigration laws, travel laws, and borders.

I like how Dwight Eisenhower handled the illegal alien problem;  a military-directed operation with a no-nonsense approach to kicking out and keeping out illegal aliens. Round them up, send them home.

Enforce the law

Deport illegals

Establish a vetting process for all foreign immigrants

Build  the wall

 

 

Related post:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/06/21/the-democrat-party-is-the-largest-hate-group-in-america/

 

Related articles:

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cnns-jim-acosta-mocked-for-accidently-proving-that-border-walls-work

https://dailycaller.com/2019/02/15/watch-as-trump-stops-mid-press-conference-tells-angel-mom-to-stand-up-and-face-the-press/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/02/15/president-donald-trump-honors-angel-moms-during-emergency-declaration/