Archive for the ‘The Media’ Category

CNN Reporter Stunned as Former Dems Give Trump’s First Year a Thumbs Up


The media, especially CNN, hates Donald Trump and the fact that he doesn’t put up with their shit. He doesn’t back down, which drives them insane and makes them engage in some of the most pathetic, embarrassing, shameful behavior on record. He literally reduces them to puerile mush.

Even worse, he’s reversing the damage Barky Obama did to this country and fulfilling his campaign promises.

The fact that the media is having a mental breakdown makes us like Donald Trump even more.

If the media thinks Trump isn’t living up to our expectations, they are sadly mistaken.



Related articles:


New York DA Raids Newsweek Offices

I hope they get shut down.


Via The New York Post

About two dozen investigators from the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office raided the offices of Newsweek and its parent company, IBT Media, on Thursday.

IBT Media was co-founded by Jonathan Davis and Etienne Uzac. The IRS placed a $1.2 million federal tax lien against Uzac in December 2017.

The agents were said to be photographing servers in the offices, but not downloading any files at the offices at 7 Hanover Square, according to sources.

They appeared to be photographing the serial numbers on the machines, said a source.

In the past, IBT has been linked to a Christian church founded by Korean-American evangelist David Jang and Olivet University, a university in California that Jang’s followers founded.

The IRS had not responded to a call by press time. The Manhattan DA declined to comment.


In other news:

The liberal shitbags at Newsweek practice age and sex discrimination:

Newsweek editor-in-chief Matt McAllester is out and has been replaced by executive editor Bob Roe, the company announced in an internal memo to staff.

In July, McAllester was mentioned prominently in an age and sex discrimination suit filed against Time Inc., where he used to work, by Catherine Mayer, Time magazine’s former Europe editor.

The Post reported on Aug. 9 that McAllester was taking a leave of absence from Newsweek for “personal reasons.”

Mayer’s suit names only Time Inc. as a defendant — but McAllester was mentioned prominently as one of the main alleged perpetrators of the claimed age and sex discrimination.


Some of the worst bias, bigotry, hate speech,  sexism, and discrimination is practiced by the contingent of liberal hypocrites.



Related article:


President Trump Issues Fake News Awards

Congratulations to the winners. You deserve it.

liberal winners fake news

Via Fox News

President Trump revealed the winners of his self-proclaimed ‘Fake News’ awards Wednesday night on Twitter with The New York Times topping the list.

Before naming the full list of “winners,” the website cited that “studies have shown that over 90% of the media’s coverage of President Trump is negative.”

It went on to call 2017 “a year of unrelenting bias, unfair news coverage and even downright fake news.”

Below is the full list of winners of the 2017 Fake News Awards:

1)     The New York Times’ Paul Krugman claiming markets would ‘never’ recover from Trump presidency

2)     ABC News’ Brian Ross’ bungled report on former national security adviser Michael Flynn

3)     CNN report that the Trump campaign had early access to hacked documents from WikiLeaks

4)     TIME report that Trump removed a bust of Martin Luther King, Jr. from the Oval Office

5)     The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel tweeting that Trump’s December rally in Pensacola, Florida, wasn’t packed with supporters

6)     CNN’s video suggesting Trump overfed fish during visit with Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe

7)     CNN’s retracted report claiming Anthony Scaramucci-Russia ties

8)     Newsweek report that Polish First Lady Agata Kornhauser-Duda did not shake Trump’s hand

9)     CNN report that former FBI Director James Comey would dispute President Trump’s claim he was told he was not under investigation

10)  The New York Times report that the Trump administration had hidden a climate-change report

11)  In Trump’s words, “‘RUSSIA COLLUSION!’ Russian collusion is perhaps the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American people. THERE IS NO COLLUSION!”

Related articles:

Project Veritas Undercover Videos Show Twitter Staff Bragging About Big Brother Tactics, Censoring Conservatives

From Project Veritas

Steven Pierre, Twitter engineer explains “shadow banning,” says “it’s going to ban a way of talking”

Former Twitter software engineer Abhinav Vadrevu on shadow banning: “they just think that no one is engaging with their content, when in reality, no one is seeing it”

Former Twitter Content Review Agent Mo Norai explains banning process: “if it was a pro-Trump thing and I’m anti-Trump… I banned his whole account… it’s at your discretion”

When asked if banning process was an unwritten rule, Norai adds “Very. A lot of unwritten rules… It was never written it was more said”

Olinda Hassan, Policy Manager for Twitter Trust and Safety explains, “we’re trying to ‘down rank’… shitty people to not show up,” “we’re working [that] on right now”

“Shadow banning” to be used to stealthily target political views- former Twitter engineer says, “that’s a thing”

Censorship of certain political viewpoints to be automated via “machine learning” according to Twitter software engineer

Parnay Singh, Twitter Direct Messaging Engineer, on machine learning algorithms, “you have like five thousand keywords to describe a redneck…” “the majority of it are for Republicans”

(San Francisco) In the latest undercover Project Veritas video investigation, current and former Twitter employees are on camera explaining steps the social media giant is taking to censor political content that they don’t like.

This video release follows the first undercover Twitter exposé Project Veritas released on January 10th which showed Twitter Senior Network Security Engineer Clay Haynes saying that Twitter is “more than happy to help the Department of Justice with their little [President Donald Trump] investigation.” Twitter responded to the video with a statement shortly after that release, stating “the individual depicted in this video was speaking in a personal capacity and does not represent of speak for Twitter.” The video released by Project Veritas today features eight employees, and a Project Veritas spokesman said there are more videos featuring additional employees coming.

On January 3rd 2018 at a San Francisco restaurant, Abhinov Vadrevu, a former Twitter Software Engineer explains a strategy, called “shadow banning,” that to his knowledge, Twitter has employed:

“One strategy is to shadow ban so you have ultimate control. The idea of a shadow ban is that you ban someone but they don’t know they’ve been banned, because they keep posting and no one sees their content. So they just think that no one is engaging with their content, when in reality, no one is seeing it.”

Twitter is in the process of automating censorship and banning, says Twitter Software Engineer Steven Pierre on December 8th of 2017:

“Every single conversation is going to be rated by a machine and the machine is going to say whether or not it’s a positive thing or a negative thing. And whether it’s positive or negative doesn’t (inaudible), it’s more like if somebody’s being aggressive or not. Right? Somebody’s just cursing at somebody, whatever, whatever. They may have point, but it will just vanish… It’s not going to ban the mindset, it’s going to ban, like, a way of talking.”

Olinda Hassan, a Policy Manager for Twitter’s Trust and Safety team explains on December 15th, 2017 at a Twitter holiday party that the development of a system of “down ranking” “shitty people” is in the works:

“Yeah. That’s something we’re working on. It’s something we’re working on. We’re trying to get the shitty people to not show up. It’s a product thing we’re working on right now.”

Former Twitter Engineer Conrado Miranda confirms on December 1st, 2017 that tools are already in place to censor pro-Trump or conservative content on the platform. When asked whether or not these capabilities exist, Miranda says, “that’s a thing.”

……At a San Francisco bar on January 5th, Pranay Singh details how the shadow-banning algorithms targeting right-leaning are engineered:

“Yeah you look for Trump, or America, and you have like five thousand keywords to describe a redneck. Then you look and parse all the messages, all the pictures, and then you look for stuff that matches that stuff.”

When asked if the majority of the algorithms are targeted against conservative or liberal users of Twitter, Singh said, “I would say majority of it are for Republicans.”

Really? Because we have many words that describe douchebags, and the majority are liberals.

Note how ‘certain words or phrases’ that indicate patriotism, backing the Constitution, support for Trump, and advocate for a strong America, are assigned algorithms and targeted for censorship because “They’re all Republican bots from Russia”:

Here are some more of the undercover videos:


Twitter’s co-founder Evan Williams isn’t a fan of free speech. He’s pretty pissed that social media provides an outlet for the patriotic opposition to circumvent liberal control of the main stream media. He says that he ‘was wrong for thinking that the world would be a better place if there was a platform for everyone to freely speak and exchange ideas.’  Really?  Leftwingnuts want to live in a world where everyone listens only to them, on their terms. Last I checked, the 1st amendment guarantees that right to everyone.

Williams laments that Twitter helped Trump win the election. I certainly hope so. Donald Trump takes his positions and case right to the American people without the interference of the hostile leftards in the media.

Sucks to be Williams.

Meet the leftwing Twitter tool who favors antifa thugs and decides who’s a ‘Nazi’:

This is the Twitter page of the liberal scrunt ( who runs  Twitter support. She lets antifa, BLM, and other leftwing extremist blowhards run rampant with their hatespeech and rhetoric all over Twitter, but, conservatives get censored.

Her own Twitter timeline is full of race-baiting, anti-Trump, pro-Left, pro-Obama, anti-white posts and lots of support for the NFL douchebags who disrespect the flag and the anthem.

One of the ways the Twitter hierarchy has been censoring unwanted political viewpoints is ‘shadow banning’.  Twitter maintains a ‘whitelist’ of favored Twitter accounts and a ‘blacklist’ of unfavored accounts. Accounts on the whitelist are prioritized in search results, accounts on the blacklist have their posts hidden from both search results and other users’ timelines.  The blacklist usually consists of right-leaning posters. Leftwing lunatic fringe, racist minorities, and muzzie extremists get a pass. 

If you’re going to be slanted one way or the other as a news outlet or social media, be honest about it and don’t pretend to be ‘neutral’.

I fit all their targeted categories and I am not a “bot from Russia”.   Anyone who doesn’t goosestep to their leftwing politics is simply parsed and censored.

For those who are interested, there’s a free speech site called Gab ( where you can speak your mind and opinions without fear of jackbooted retribution. I’ve already joined.

Related post:

Related article:

Rush Limbaugh on President Trump’s Televised Conference With Dem Congressional Leaders: ‘Brilliantly conceived and flawlessly executed’

Via Rush Limbaugh

……Folks, this has been a point that I have made on immigration going back to 2000.  So this is 18th year — and it’s probably longer than that — that I have made this point, that the Democrats need a permanent underclass.  Well, guess what?  It has just been admitted to! The Democrats have just admitted that this is exactly what this is all about.  “LEAKED MEMO: DREAMers Are ‘Critical’ to Dem[ocrat]s ‘Future Electoral Success’ — The Center For American Progress (CAP) Action Fund…”

That’s the left-wing bunch that Podesta has run. ThinkProgress, Center for American Progress, this is the intellectual hothouse for the radical left agenda in America.  They were very instrumental with Obama. It was a lot of Obama’s people in it, still are.  Jennifer Palmieri is a former Clintonite, and she was one of the primary architects of Hillary Clinton’s defeat.  Now she is running the show over there.  “The Center for American Progress (CAP) Action Fund circulated a memo [yesterday] calling illegal immigrants brought here at a young age — so-called ‘DREAMers’ — a ‘critical component of the Democratic Party’s future electoral success.’”

……Now, this memo was not supposed to leak.  It was not supposed to be made public.  It has been made public.  “The memo, co-authored by former Clinton communications director Jennifer Palmieri, was sent around to allies calling on Democrats to ‘refuse to offer any votes for Republican spending bills that do not offer a fix for DREAMers and instead appropriate funds to deport them.’”

If that’s what Trump does, then the Democrats are under orders here not to make any deal.  So what is Trump doing?  He’s making them say this in public with the Drive-By cameras rolling.  In other words, the Democrats are being told to refuse to even vote on any bill dealing with immigration or the budget that does not include amnesty for the DREAMers.

…..So we’ll have the have to wait and see what the actual details were of the meeting and what the Democrats said, what they advanced. But folks, you heard all during the campaign about Trump being The Art of the Deal negotiator, this brilliant, run-rings-around-’em negotiator. I’m just looking at Trump’s body language here as he’s conducting this meeting. He’s kind of sitting there with his arms crossed and folded across his chest, got a serious look on his face as he’s listening to what these Democrats have to say. But he’s forcing them on the record what they want in front of the media.

……There’s another observation here.  We’ve got the Michael Wolff book, and among its many assertions is that Trump is senile and he’s in the early stages of dementia, that he has no attention span, that he’s deluded and delusional.  CNN and all the cable networks have just spent an hour televising Trump in total control of a meeting, with the Democrats in the meeting showing total deference and respect to Trump.

They’re not acting like they’re talking to an idiot who doesn’t know what he’s talking about.  So this little televised meeting here is dispelling this idea that Trump is deranged and out of it and doesn’t know what he’s doing, is incompetent and unfit.

……There are people I can tell you very worried on the pro-Trump side about this meeting. You’re shaking your head in there. Well, there are some. There are some Trump supporters who don’t like the way he did this meeting, and they don’t like the fact that he said he would do a DACA bill and then come back and do comprehensive. There are people that think Trump is getting rolled in this meeting and so forth. We’ll have to see. I am not of that frame of mind.

I think there is a keen brilliance in having this televised. We’ve never seen this, folks. This has not been done. Usually the media is ushered out of the room after five minutes or so where everybody claps and smiles and shakes hands and somebody says what they’re going to be talking about. The media is eventually sent packing. But they weren’t. The entire meeting took place under the watchful eye of Drive-By Media cameras.

……He told them every time he was asked, “There isn’t gonna be a deal without a wall. There isn’t gonna be a deal without chain migration ending.”

……It was a brilliantly conceived and flawlessly executed rebuttal to this stupid Wolff bookThe pictures tell the tale.  Trump is in the room dominating it, controlling it.  He is cooperative.  He is open.  He’s tolerant.  He’s understanding.  He’s in total command of over 45 minutes of televised meeting on immigration.  He is totally informed on the issues.  He’s going back and forth with the Democrats on whatever mundane aspect of it they bring up.  He is in total command of his position on this.

He was firm, and he didn’t waver, and he did it while being very amiable.  It was not accidental that seated on Trump’s right was Dick Durbin and on his left was Steny Hoyer, two prominent Democrats from the Senate and the House.  They were captured by the cameras paying total, rapt attention to Trump when he spoke, and they looked totally respectful.  So after you watch this, how would you react to anything in the Wolff book characterizing Trump as just the opposite of this?  And this was the purpose of this today.

……I’ll tell you what else. I think Trump trapped the Democrats. There’s no way the Democrats knew the media was gonna be in the meeting, no way. The Democrats did not have any idea that the meeting was to show off Trump at work. And that’s exactly what this meeting did. And the Democrats are trapped in there. Once it starts, there’s — you can see Durbin and Hoyer, I noticed a couple times they’re looking a little nervous. They realized what happened to them.

Trump’s in there nice as he can be, respectful, in total command, running the show, respectful, open to any idea, nowhere near deranged, unattached, uninterested, none of this boorish behavior that’s described, no senility and all that. And so Trump traps the Democrats and the media into showing him in total command. I mean, you look at it from that perspective, the thing is absolutely brilliant. They had no idea, they got sucked in, and they have been used.

Even Gloria Borger, grab sound bite 31 real quick. Gloria Borger, who is like anybody else in that town, wants Trump gone as soon as she can make it happen, said this on CNN.

BORGER: Can we just take a step back, first of all, and remark upon what we just watched. I mean, this wasn’t just cameras in the courtroom. This was cameras in the jury room during the deliberations. I have covered Washington for a very long time, and I have not seen anything like this. And I think the president deserves credit for this, because what we got to watch was people actually — and I turned to Dan at some point, and I said, “Is this real?”

……You watch, folks. The Democrats, when they figure this out, are gonna be fit to be tied when they figure out what happened to them today. You talk about master negotiator pulling the Rug out from under a bunch of people that thought they were on the way to the 25th Amendment.

……What happened today really had nothing to do with immigration. He didn’t say anything today that he can’t walk back. He didn’t say anything today that he’s gonna have to walk back, either. It’s all good. In fact, it’s better than that. Wait till you see the Democrats when they figure out what just happened to them.


The leaked DACA memo doesn’t contain any real surprises. Anyone who follows the pattern of Dem agenda, talking points and strategy knows that illegal aliens are part of their voting bloc.  They intend to entrench and exploit as many (Hispanic) illegals as they can to push their socialist agenda, institutionalize selective rights, and wrest control of the country away from American citizens. Democrats  would rather subvert the voting process for political gain than follow the law.

BTW: The same Dems who bitch about Trump’s plan for a wall, had no problem with Obama’s plans for a fence:

Five years ago, the entire Senate Democratic caucus voted for hundreds of miles of fencing along the U.S.-Mexico border.

How times have changed.

Democrats are now blasting President Trump’s border wall demands as “ineffective” and “unreasonable,” as they battle his initial $18 billion request.

And Republicans, along with other border-security advocates, are countering by accusing Democrats of flipping their position now that Trump is president.

“What we’re seeing right now is the height of hypocrisy from the Democrats, when the Democrats in 2013 wanted the immigration reform,” President of the National Border Patrol Council Brandon Judd said Tuesday on “Fox & Friends First.” “The only thing that’s changed is we now have Trump sitting in the White House instead of Obama in the White House and all of a sudden they’re against it.”

……the (Dems) bill called for the deployment of an additional 700 miles of fencing and technology along the U.S.-Mexico border – the same area Trump’s border wall would cover. The plan also devoted $40 billion over a decade to border enforcement measures and would double the number of border agents.

……All 52 Democrats, plus Sens. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Angus King, I-Maine, voted in favor of the 2013 bill, which died in the House. And in 2006, Democrats like then-Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., Joe Biden, D-Del., and current Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., voted in favor of the Secure Fence Act, which would add “two layers of reinforced fencing, installation of additional physical barriers” to ports of entry along the southern border.


Bottom line: President Trump must build the wall, and continue to enforce our immigration laws.  The Dems can suck sewer water.



Related posts:


Related article: