Archive for the ‘Politics’ Category

Squalling Liberal She-Ass Who Attacked an Elderly Man for Wearing a MAGA Hat, Goes Into Hiding After Backlash

Via Breitbart


The Palo Alto woman who drew criticism for launching a campaign to ridicule an elderly man for wearing a Donald Trump “MAGA” campaign hat has disappeared from view and has seemingly gone into hiding.

Early in April, Rebecca Parker Mankey, 46, decided to launch a public shaming of a 74-year-old Jewish man named “Victor F.” in public accounts of his encounter with the woman.

Mankey saw Victor in a Palo Alto Starbucks and took issue with his “Make America Great Again” hat. Calling him a racist and a fascist, Mankey took to social media to attack the elderly man.

“He will never forget me and will think seriously about wearing that hat in my town ever again,” she wrote in one of her posts attacking the man. “If you see him in this hat, please confront him. You do not want to be the person who didn’t speak up as we slipped into fascism.”

Oh, and the bitch got fired from her job, too.

But almost immediately, Mankey experienced a backlash against her social warriorism, so much so that she was fired from her job for attacking the man.

Now it appears that Mankey has gone into hiding, Fox News reports.

The woman has not been at her Palo Alto home for a week and may have moved to Aberdeen, Washington, according to phone records obtained by members of the media.

“We have nothing that makes us think she’s at-risk,” Sgt. Aaron Clark of the Lake County Sheriff’s Office told the San Jose Mercury News. “We’ve determined from the people we’ve talked to that she is voluntarily missing.”

She’s a 46 year old adult and she looks like this. 



SF Gate reported Wednesday that the woman, Parker Mankey, photographed the customer wearing a MAGA hat and berated him in front of everyone in Starbucks.

Mankey then doxxed the man in a Monday Facebook post because he wore the red Trump-campaign issued cap.

“He will never forget me and will think seriously about wearing that hat in my town ever again,” she wrote. “If you see him in this hat, please confront him. You do not want to be the person who didn’t speak up as we slipped into fascism.”

……The man wearing the hat, named Victor, told NBC Bay Area that the woman had called him “a Nazi” and tried to entice other Starbucks customers to mock him.

“This woman comes over, and she says ‘Is that a Trump hat?’ I said, ‘I think it is, yes.’ And then she turned to the rest of the audience, the people in Starbucks and said ‘Hey, everybody! Come over here! Let’s get this guy! He’s a hater! I’m calling him out! He hates brown people. He’s a Nazi,’” Victor recalled.

The woman’s post gained so much traction on social media that her employer, Gryphon Strings music store, announced on Facebook Tuesday that it would be terminating her employment.


Maybe she jumped off a bridge. We can only hope.

The Left has escalated its political-motivated violence to a new level. It’s time to fight back.



Related posts:

Armed Citizens Detain Hundreds of Illegals at the Border

  1. They’re NOT ‘asylum seekers’. They’re illegal alien invaders.
  2. If the NM Governor did her job, ordinary citizens wouldn’t have to.


Via Fox News

An armed right-wing militia group operating along the U.S.-Mexico border posted several videos to social media this week, including one in which they held about 200 asylum-seeking migrants at gunpoint near Sunland Park, N.M., until U.S. Border Patrol agents arrived, according to a report.

The militia group, which calls itself the United Constitutional Patriots, said it is determined to monitor the border until President Trump fulfills his campaign promise of a border wall or until Congress enacts stronger legislation to make it more difficult for migrants to request asylum, Jim Benvie, a spokesman, told The New York Times in a phone interview.

“It should go without saying that regular citizens have no authority to arrest or detain anyone,” the governor of New Mexico, Michelle Lujan Grisham, said in a statement to The New York Times, adding that it is “completely unacceptable” that migrants be “menaced or threatened” upon entering the U.S.


If more of these dregs were intimidated enough not to sneak across the border and enter this country illegally, citizen militias wouldn’t feel the need to do it.

ICE is overwhelmed, the Dems want to bring in as many illegals as they can to add them to their voting bloc and exploit for political gain, and the border is still not yet completely secured.

Hundreds of crimes are committed by these vermin. Cop killers, rapists, child molesters,murderers, thieves, robbers, gangs (MS13s), and a slew of other human garbage are coming into this country illegally and committing more felonies once they get in.

The cost of illegal aliens taking American lives is memorialized here:

The U.S. has the right to control who enters the country. There is no Constitutional or legal right for a foreigner to enter the U.S.  It’s a privilege. Every country has immigration laws, travel laws, and borders.

I like how Dwight Eisenhower handled the illegal alien problem;  a military-directed operation with a no-nonsense approach to kicking out and keeping out illegal aliens. Round them up, send them home.

Enforce the law

Deport illegals

Establish a vetting process for all foreign immigrants

Build  the wall



Related article:

Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, YouTube Creating ‘Global Censorship Database’

This is the kind of shit that happens under communist and Islamic totalitarian regimes

Via NewsBusters

Social media platforms and Big Tech companies have been slowly working to censor content on their platforms more efficiently.

Emma Llanso, Director of Free Expression at the Center for Democracy and Technology, wrote in an op-ed for Wired that the response to the New Zealand mass shooting in March brought the internet to a terrifying reality. Tech companies have only emphasized more “increasingly centralized and opaque censorship of the global internet.”

Llanso pointed out that Facebook’s announcement detailing plans of countering terrorism is already taking steps towards automatic censorship. The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism, composed of Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter and YouTube, was launched in 2017 to help sites regulate themselves and remove content that could potentially be illegal. However, the forum has “a shared database of hashes of files identified by the participating companies to be “extreme and egregious” terrorist content.”

Facebook wrote in a blog post on March 18 that it was adding more content to this database. The company stressed “industry cooperation” and wrote that it helpfully “identified abusive content” on other sites.

But Facebook was not alone: Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote that he was interested in building a “safe search engine” that “blocked the accessing of such content at the point when people attempt to view and download it.” Smith emphasized “healthier online environments,” and said that “it doesn’t help when online interaction normalizes in cyberspace standards of behavior that almost all of us would consider unacceptable in the real world.”

Llanso wrote that the hash database suffered from a complete lack of transparency and accountability. “No one outside of the consortium of companies knows what is in the database,” she said. “People whose posts are removed or accounts disabled on participating sites aren’t even notified if the hash database was involved.”

The bleak reality of just how much power these companies have is manifested in the fact that internet service providers in Australia actually blocked websites from users until the websites had removed offending content. In New Zealand, posting blocked content could lead to jail time.

Government censorship plays into this as well. The U.K.’s new proposals for a “regulatory regime” would most likely rely on automatic censorship and blacklist databases in order to satisfy its standards. Countries such as China and Russia already heavily regulate and block automatically online, with no free speech safeguards.


The only  “extreme and egregious” terrorist content” they focus on are the conservative viewpoints that rattle their leftwing cages.

Case in point: Conservative pundit Paul Joseph Watson got death threats from a muzzie Facebook page, but according to Facebook it ‘doesn’t violate community standards’.

Lauren Southern, a conservative commentator, was banned from Facebook for 30 days because she posted a comment that criticized the left-leaning hierarchy’s habit of censoring opposing viewpoints. The irony is lost on The Zuck.

Zuck’s minions also  banned links to Zerohedge.

Conservative sites have been suspended over Zuckerberg’s political preferences, but leftie radicalsmuzzie terrorists and their mouthpieces, and videos demonstrating adult sex acts to kids, are relatively unscathed.

Twitter is just as bad. Jack Dorsey’s drones ban people whenever they see something they don’t like.  An undercover video from Project Veritas shows Twitter employees bragging on their censorship skills against conservatives.

Twitter’s co-founder Evan Williams isn’t a fan of free speech. He’s pretty pissed that social media provides an outlet for the patriotic opposition to circumvent liberal control of the main stream media. He says that he ‘was wrong for thinking that the world would be a better place if there was a platform for everyone to freely speak and exchange ideas.’  Really?  Leftwingnuts want to live in a world where everyone listens only to them, on their terms. Last I checked, the 1st amendment guarantees that right to everyone.

One of the ways the Twitter hierarchy has been censoring unwanted political viewpoints is ‘shadow banning’.  Twitter maintains a ‘whitelist’ of favored Twitter accounts and a ‘blacklist’ of unfavored accounts. Accounts on the whitelist are prioritized in search results, accounts on the blacklist have their posts hidden from both search results and other users’ timelines.  The blacklist usually consists of right-leaning posters. Leftwing lunatic fringe, anti-white racists, and muzzie zealots are acceptable. I am constantly being censored on Twitter and Facebook for telling the truth about ‘the religion of peace’. 

Twitter also banned conservative street artist Sabo.

As if that weren’t enough, even conservative employees at Twitter don’t feel safe to express their personal opinions.

Microsoft has jumped on the censorship bandwagon by declaring war on free speech and “offensive language” .

Google thinks the web should be controlled because free speech is unacceptable.

I no longer use their browser. I stick to DuckDuckGo as a search engine and Brave as my main browser. Neither one tracks users.

Gab is an alternative site that promotes and supports free speech. Everything from alt-right to alt-left is permitted. If you don’t like an opinion, you can debate all day without fear of censorship.  I  joined the site in 2016, and I’m very pleased with it.  It’s free to join. I encourage anyone who is fed up with the bullshit at Twitter and Facebook to give it a try. You won’t be disappointed.

There’s an escalating collusion between governments and social media conglomerates with common leftwing agenda. Their mutual jackbooted methods are incredibly oppressive and tyrannical.

It’s happening across Europe; in Germany and Britain in particular. The respective governments have actually made it a crime to criticize the very murderous Islamic ‘culture’ that slaughters their citizens, refuses to assimilate, and has established ‘no-go zones’ and enclaves for their Sharia-based oppression.

If you think the attack on free speech is limited to other countries, think again. It’s happening right here in America.

George Orwell called. He said 1984 is going exactly as he predicted.



Related article:


Related posts:

Full (Redacted) Mueller Report Released: President Trump Vindicated, Dems Hysterical



22 months, 500 witnesses, 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, 500 search warrants, and 2,800 subpoenas later, Mueller confirmed what we already knew: No collusion or obstruction.



Excerpts from AG William Barr’s statement:

I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election.  As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election.  But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter.  That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.

……again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations.  In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking.

The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet.  The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication.  Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps.  The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts.  Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy.  Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.

Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign.  After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.

So that is the bottom line.  After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes.

……After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

……In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context.  President Trump faced an unprecedented situation.  As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates.  At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability.  Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion.  And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks.  Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims.  And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.

Rush Limbaugh:

……This report could have been issued in one page: We found no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign, period, and we don’t have enough to say that there was any obstruction of justice. You could have done this in one page, maybe two, and be done with it.

……“We cannot exonerate.” That’s not the role of the prosecutor. It’s not the role of any investigator. You can’t exonerate somebody, and they can’t exonerate themselves. That’s why verdicts are guilty and not guilty. Not “not guilty” and innocent. Not “not guilty and exonerated.” There’s no such thing.


Time to investigate the real criminals:

The Justice Department inspector general is looking into controversial aspects of the FBI and Justice Department’s investigative decisions and tactics; and a Justice Department prosecutor, Utah U.S. attorney John Huber, has a parallel ongoing investigation.

Moreover, Attorney General Barr has indicated that he will be directing an investigation that focuses, among other things, on the factual predicate that purportedly justified the Obama administration’s highly unusual decision to use foreign counterintelligence authorities (and other investigative powers) to scrutinize a political campaign – a probe that would not be limited to the FBI and Justice Department decision-making but that would assess the actions of, for instance, other intelligence agencies. (Note that  former CIA director John Brennan’s own account, he played a key role in spurring the investigation. To say the least, it is highly unusual for the CIA to enmesh itself in a U.S. political campaign.)


Right on cue, the media libtards have a complete meltdown:

How are they going to spin this? When you don’t have the facts or the law on your side, you attack the messenger.

And Hollywood reacted with its usual flair:




For over 2 years the Left put Mueller on a pedestal, hoping that he would fulfill their wet dreams of ‘collusion’ and ‘obstruction’ Now that the report proves neither was found, they’re vilifying him.

You want cover ups, snowflakes?

Here’s what should be investigated:

The Russians gave $35 million to a company with John Podesta on the board.

A fake dossier paid for by one political party and its candidate was used by the government to spy on that candidate’s opponent.

The Obama regime’s FISA abuse in order to get permission to wiretap Trump.

James Comey, who is an unscrupulous douchebag, was part and parcel of the conspiracy to undermine the election and overthrow a duly elected president though false allegations and sedition. He also leaked classified information when it suited his purpose and lied to the FISA court.  He also covered for Hillary and refused to prosecute her for her crimes.

Former CIA director John Brennan, colluded with British and Estonian spies to undermine the election.

Hillary’s Uranium One deal with the Russians that netted her $145 million to her corrupt Clinton Foundation.

Mueller is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. He eagerly participated in a wild goose chase of phantom crimes. He should be investigated, as well.

Bottom line: The investigation was a conspiracy to oust a duly elected President on baseless grounds.




Related posts:

Related articles:

President Trump Considers Giving Liberals All the Illegals They Want by Dumping Them in Their ‘Sanctuary Cities’

Hoity-toity affluent liberals get pretty miffed when their manicured communities are invaded by illegals. The rest of us peons are expected to put up with it.

From Fox News

President Trump responded to reports Friday that his administration proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities by not only confirming the plan but saying it remains under “strong” consideration.
Further, the president tweeted that relocating illegal immigrants to these districts should make the “Radical Left” happy.
The comments came after The Washington Post first reported that the White House proposed sending the detainees to sanctuary cities twice in the last six months. The proposal was first floated in November amid reports of a large migrant caravan from Central America making its way to the southern border. The idea was again considered in February, amid the standoff with Congress over a border wall.

……“Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only,” Trump tweeted.

“The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy—so this should make them very happy!” he continued.

Trump repeated the remarks later at the White House: “We can give them an unlimited supply…let’s see if they have open arms.”

The president doubled down as Democrats fumed over the relocation idea.


It’s brilliant. Since the Dems are always bragging about the adoration they have for illegals, then they can have as many as their bleeding hearts desire, right in their own fucking back yards.

Start with dropping them off at Obama’s new house in the Kalorama neighborhood of Washington D.C.

Looks large enough to fit a few dozen at the residence.

Or Nancy Pelosi’s mansion in California:

I bet she could fit some in there, as well.

Pro-illegal alien Chuckie Schumer lives in a fancy apartment at 9 Park West in New York. It’s no mansion , but I bet one of his walk in closets is large enough to house a small number of Mexican illegals.


The ‘sanctuary cities‘ thumb their collective noses at the immigration laws, and give illegals taxpayer-funded benefits like food stamps, welfare, free educationtax creditsmedical care, and housing.

It’s time to send the illegal vermin into the wealthy liberals’ neighborhoods by the busloads.

Any libturd who opens their piehole in support of illegals should be required to back up their bullshit by dealing with the consequences.



Related article: