Archive for the ‘“Peaceful” religion of Islam’ Category

After Years of Doing Damage to Germany, Merkel Steps Down


German Chancellor Angela Merkel is stepping down from her party’s chairwoman position.

During a press conference Monday in Berlin, Merkel announced she will not be seeking reelection as leader of Germany’s Christian Democratic Party. Merkel has held this position for two decades.

Critics believe this may be the beginning of the end for Merkel’s era as one of the most influential political figures in the European Union.

“I will not put myself forward again as candidate for the CDU chair,” she announced. “Secondly, this fourth term is my last as German chancellor — at the federal election in 2021, I will not stand again as chancellor candidate.”

Merkel is expected to finish out the rest of her three year term as chancellor.



Muzzie refujihadists, rapists, thieves, and assorted other felons have gained access to Germany because this stupid scrunt put out the welcome mat.

The German authorities and media have tried to cover up the crimes because they don’t want to “offend” the muzzie invaders.

As if Germany’s suicidal policies weren’t enough, the authorities are prosecuting anyone who protests the muzzie criminal invasion and also worked out a deal with (*surprise*) Facebook to censor criticism that constitutes “hate speech” in a country that has no equivalent to freedom of speech.

The entire continent of Europe is saturated with these muzzie thugs, yet the idiots in government keep making excuses and pandering to them.  The terrorist attacks in Britain are increasing.

The rise of Islamic terrorism on the European continent started the day they put out the welcome mat for Haji invaders.

Muzzie animals commit massacres across Germany and have engaged in multiple terrorist attacks in France and Belgium, starting with Charlie Hebdo in January, 2015. Evidently, they haven’t had enough carnage. Instead of preventing these muzzie monsters from entering their region and deporting the rest, they prefer to become eunuchs for the New Caliphate.

If Germany, or Europe for that matter, has the courage to save itself, it will oust every last piece of muzzie vermin out of the region and stop any more from coming in.

We’ll see if the Germans have the guts to elect a leader who will do that.


Related posts:


Looks Like Khashoggi’s Murder Wasn’t Such a Bad Thing After All

Turns out Khashoggi was a terrorist in a business suit.

Via Frontpage Magazine

Media martyr Jamal Khashoggi is being described as a political dissident.

Sure. So were Hitler, Khomeini and Osama bin Laden.

By no coincidence, Jamal Khashoggi was an old friend of Osama bin Laden.

In early 1990 Bin Laden returned to Saudi Arabia and gave a lecture in which he predicted that Saddam Hussein would invade Kuwait.

Jamal Khashoggi, who had travelled extensively with Bin Laden in Afghanistan, attended the talk and afterwards asked his old friend how he could be so certain of the future.

“He recited a verse from the Koran,” recalls Jamal.

“The verse means the one who practises jihad for God, for Allah, God will show them the right path. I wasn’t comfortable about it. He had given himself the position of ‘I am seeing things because God is directing me towards it’. That was the first time I felt that Osama began to have an inflated ego.”

Jamal lost touch with Bin Laden in the mid-1990s and Khaled in the early 1990s as both completely rejected his ideology.

Although it has been many years since either of them saw Bin Laden, both admitted feeling sad at the death of their old friend in a raid by US forces in Pakistan earlier this month.

……He was a Muslim Brotherhood member and continued backing the Jihadist network.

Under Muhammad bin Salman, the hitherto ambiguous Saudis now side with the Emiratis. He speaks of a “triangle of evil” encompassing Iran, IS and the Muslim Brotherhood. As such he seems to be drawing a dividing line between Arab states (and tame salafists) on one side, and all forms of Islamism on the other—be they non-violent Brothers or jihadists. “It is a crazy analysis about the threat of a pan-Islamic empire,” says Jamal Khashoggi, a former editor of al-Watan, a Saudi-owned newspaper, who now works as a columnist in exile in America. “He treats IS and the Brotherhood as the same thing—the only difference being that IS tried to create the caliphate immediately by violence while the Brotherhood wants to create the caliphate slowly, through democracy.”

Although the Brotherhood never seemed very strong in the Gulf, its election victory in Egypt in 2012 unnerved Gulf rulers. Saudi Arabia and the UAE enthusiastically supported the coup that overthrew President Muhammad Morsi of the Brotherhood, not least because he was moving closer to Iran. For Mr Khashoggi, the campaign against the Brothers is an attempt to extinguish the last embers of the Arab spring: “Democracy and political Islam go together.”

That’s that “democratic” Caliphate.

……And here’s Khashoggi vouching for an alleged terror funder for Al Qaeda.

“Yet Mr. Khalifa is unsure how long he will enjoy these freedoms. He is a wanted man, believed by analysts and intelligence agencies, including the FBI and CIA, to have links to the heart of Al Qaeda. Using charities in the Philippines as a cover, Khalifa is alleged to have funded the radical Islamic group Abu Sayyaf. He is also said to have spearheaded plots including a foiled 1995 plan to hijack planes and crash them into the Pentagon and CIA headquarters – widely seen as a blueprint for the Sept. 11 attacks.

The victims of Sept. 11 have named Khalifa in their multibillion dollar lawsuit for damages.

Jamal Khashoggi, a Saudi columnist whose views are aired in the Western media, is a Khalifa supporter.

“I know Jamal very well and there is no way I believe he is involved [with Al Qaeda],” says Mr. Khashoggi.”


And he also insisted that the Muslim Brotherhood was just misunderstood.

The Saudis themselves  are  some of the worst terrorist facilitators on the planet. They’re not “allies”.

All they did was kill one of their own.



Related post:

Related article:

British Cop Hid in Locked Vehicle While Muzzie Terrorist Stabbed Fellow Officer to Death

Running the son of a bitch over with his vehicle to defend his colleague never occurred to him.

Via the Independent UK


The acting head of the Metropolitan Police locked himself in a car as one of his officers was murdered metres away during the Westminster attack, an inquest has heard.

Sir Craig Mackey was commissioner of Britain’s largest force at the time of the atrocity, where Khalid Masood ran down four victims with his car and stabbed PC Keith Palmer to death.

An inquest into Masood’s death heard that Sir Craig was being driven out of the Houses of Parliament when the attack started on 22 March 2017.

The senior officer, who is now deputy commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, had been to a meeting with the policing minister and recalled being in his “shirt sleeves”.

Sir Craig told the Old Bailey he heard an “abnormally loud bang” that he feared was an explosion before seeing Masood start attacking PC Palmer.

The 52-year-old had crashed his car into railings surrounding parliament after killing four victims with his car on Westminster Bridge, then charged through Carriage Gates armed with two large knives.

“There was quite a lot of confusion about what was going on,” Sir Craig said. “The way that the male came in and the purposeful way he in came, that was a clear threat.”

He recalled locking the doors of his chauffeur-driven car, where neither of the two other people inside had stab vests, any other equipment or a radio to communicate with officers about what was happening.

“A colleague in the car had clearly seen what had gone on as well, and I locked the door,” he added. “I’ve got no protective equipment, no radio … we were in a ministerial meeting and literally came out to that.”

From the car’s passenger seat Sir Craig described seeing “two determined stab wounds”, adding: “I could see PC Palmer moving backwards and him going down.”

Sir Craig, who is to retire in December, said: “The attacker had one of those looks where, if they get you in that look, they would be after you.

……Sir Craig was then driven away and started coordinating the response to the attack, which was initially feared to involve multiple terrorists.

……PC Palmer died at the scene after undergoing emergency surgery and first-aid from paramedics and bystanders, including defence minister Tobias Ellwood. Masood was pronounced dead in hospital later that afternoon.


Britain is in the throes of suicide. It allows violent terrorist muzzie pigs onto its soil, condoning the the carnage, and in the case of Craig, abetted by cowardice.  They murder, rape, and commit acts of terrorism with impunity while citizens who speak out against it are censored, harassed, and prosecuted.

Put a gun to your heads, Britain. It’s faster.

U.K. Police Too Busy With Internet “Hate Speech” as Real Crime Skyrockets

Kahn is too busy persecuting British citizens who speak out against the carnage by his Islamic pals.

Via Breitbart

UK Police are too busy responding to trivial social media spats to tackle serious crime, the new head of the Police Federation has said, after years of forces encouraging “hate crime” reports for offensive comments.
Officers on the street still have a “desperation to do the job and very often they can’t because their hands are tied,” according to chairman John Apter who represents 120,000 rank-and-file officers.

He argued that the focus on new types of crime, including cyber and “hate offences,” can come at the expense of traditional police work. Both need addressing, he said, but not one at the expense of the other.

Mr Apter told The Sunday Telegraph: “Where we get drawn into local disagreements, the argument over the remote control, the dispute in the playground, the row on Facebook, it is frustrating.

“I think police time can be better spent and it makes a mockery when we are so stretched. You can’t treat society like that and you can’t treat the police as political footballs.

“We need to have a sensible debate with politicians, with society and with the public about exactly what they want their police to do.

“People join the police to keep people safe and to lock up bad people, not to sort out petty squabbles over a remote control.”

Police forces have been actively encouraging people to report “hate crimes” in recent years, online and off, with hundreds of officers dedicated to the area. However, given understanding “hate crimes” rely on thoughts, feelings, and intentions they are intrinsically subjective.

……Sadiq Khan’s office promised to set up a police “online hate crime hub” to work in “partnership with social media providers” to criminalise “trolls” who “target… individuals and communities”.

Meanwhile, real-world, physical, and violent crimes have been surging, including a deadly violent crimes wave concentrated in the capital London. Knife crime has hit a record high, but more than 90 percent of recorded crimes are not ending in charges being brought, the latest figures reveal.


Britain is in the throes of suicide. It allows violent terrorist muzzie pigs onto its soil and the ensuing carnage is condoned by gutless law enforcement.  They murder, rape, and commit acts of terrorism with impunity while citizens who speak out against it are censored, harassed, and prosecuted.

Put a gun to your heads, Britain. It’s faster.


Related article:

Road to 9/11: What Intel Agencies Knew and Didn’t Know, What Bubba Clinton Did and Didn’t Do

There was so much bureaucratic incompetence, indifference, uncooperative behavior, and sloppy analysis in the hierarchy, it’s no fucking wonder the muzzie terrorists were able to pull 9/11 off so easily.


Via The Strata-Sphere

From this source, we find out when the detection of the ‘Brooklyn Cell’ transpired and when the report was made:

“In September 2000, one year before the Al Qaeda attacks of 9/11, a U.S. Army military intelligence program, known as Able Danger, identified a terrorist cell based in Brooklyn, NY, one of whose members was 9/11 ringleader Mohammed Atta, and recommended to their military superiors that the FBI be called in to take out that cell…”

……Which puts the Able Danger Report right on top of these other events.

What is missing is when did the DoD lawyers make the determination to drop Atta and his 3 compatriots, and who in the administration was involved in that decision.

Interestingly enough, around 6 months or so after their report on Atta the group was disbanded in Clinton’s last federal budget year

A small group of intelligence employees ran “Able Danger” from the fall of 1999 until February 2001 – just seven months before the terrorist attacks – when the operation was axed.

I think we need to know when the Able Danger report was made and when the decision came down to let Atta go. We need to understand how far up the report went (which would seem pretty high given the Clinton administrations focus on AQ in country) and who participated in the decision to back off Atta.


From The History Channel:

HISTORY talked to five intelligence and law-enforcement veterans of those investigations about the challenges they faced convincing others in the government of the threat posed by al Qaeda and other Sunni Islamist groups.

Cynthia Storer, former analyst with the CIA’s Counterterrorist Center

One of first big missed opportunities was just losing most of our intelligence collection after the Soviets began to withdraw from Afghanistan in 1988. It was that peace dividend that [Bill] Clinton wanted, that the American people wanted after the Soviet Union collapsed, so we fired all of our Afghan assets and ramped down our signals-intelligence collection and everything else. If you don’t get the information to follow something closely, then you’re going to be behind the curve, which is what happened.

Everybody needed to have a change of mindset. At the end of the Cold War, the beginning of this international Sunni terrorist organization was something nobody imagined could happen, because ‘Arabs can’t work together, and these guys are a bunch of ragheads who’ve been fighting in the mountains of Afghanistan.’ Except that we knew there was a lot of very well-educated people who had been hanging out together in Afghanistan for 10 years.

Those of us who worked it weren’t under those illusions, but that was the conventional wisdom—that they weren’t capable of doing anything. We were in the Counterterrorist Center, which was the first center in the CIA [established in 1986], so the rest of the organization didn’t really understand what we did, and we were looked down on. So that combination of factors, and having women, frankly, be in the forefront of this, made it hard to convince people. My experience is, from studying these things academically, it takes about 10 years to turn people’s mindsets around. We didn’t have 10 years.

The skepticism over al Qaeda’s threat] was bad enough that the week of the Africa bombings in ’98, I was supposed to go on rotation to another office, because I was tired of swimming upstream or battling uphill or whatever you want to call it. I was exhausted. And I was tired of being talked down to… I actually got counseled by my branch chief on my performance review that I was spending too much time on bin Laden.

I’d love to know who her branch chief was.

Jack Cloonan, FBI agent who worked on the CIA-FBI Osama bin Laden unit from 1996-2002
You could say that while [al Qaeda] was beating up on the Soviets and helping us, that was terrific. But after the Soviets departed Afghanistan, the question [for U.S. intelligence and law-enforcement] then was, ‘Well, who are these people? What are they doing? What’s their focus? And was it the United States? If it was, when did that occur, and what were we doing about it?’ One of the things that I think about often is how these individual acts [like the 1990 assassination of ultra-nationalist orthodox rabbi Meir Kahane] were investigated, but not necessarily seen as part of a much broader, foreign-based radical Islam that was launching this and that the United States was Target Number One.


The mistake we made in Afghanistan at the time of the Russian pullout, was walking away and leaving a vacuum, which was promptly filled by the Taliban; the extremist faction with the most power. The Al Qaeda also took advantage by using the country as a base of operations.

The first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 should have been a wake up call.  Intelligence agencies’ counter terrorism divisions weren’t just complacent, they were brain dead.

People like FBI Agent John O’Neill warned of the Al Qaeda threat long before he was killed on 9/11.

In 1993, the FBI had information on Bin Laden’s plans to attack America.

In 1998, an FBI agent in Oklahoma wrote a memo describing reports of “large numbers of Middle Eastern males receiving flight training at Oklahoma airports” which “may be related to planned terrorist activity”.

In 2001, Kenneth Williams, an FBI agent in Phoenix,  wrote a memorandum two months before the 9/11 attacks, warning of the possibility of Osama bin Laden’s followers hijacking aircraft within the United States and using the planes in a terrorist attack.

Every one of those warnings were ignored.

The abject idiocy and dismissive attitudes of a leadership which should be focused on the threats to national security are incredible to fathom.  There’s plenty of blame to go around. The State Department, the FBI, and all the three-letter acronym intelligence agencies who didn’t connect the dots or worse, dismissed information outright because they don’t want to “offend” muslims.

Bill Clinton can also pat himself on the back. That son of a bitch had multiple opportunities to get Bin Laden and failed. Sudan even captured him and offered him up on a goddamned silver platter. Clinton turned it down.

Clinton’s response to the FIVE terrorist attacks against Americans during his term: ZERO. The Embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, the USS Cole, Khobar Towers, and the first World Trade Center attack in 1993, resulted in Bubba biting his quivering lower lip, tearing up, and doing absolutely nothing…Oh wait, that’s right, he wagged the dog by bombing KOSOVO.

He never did take the war on terrorism as seriously as Monica’s mouth-to-crotch resuscitation. Three times after Aug. 20, 1998, when Clinton ordered the only missile strike of his presidency against bin Laden’s organization, the CIA came close enough to pinpointing bin Laden in order for Clinton to authorize final preparations to launch. In each case, he aborted the mission. Bin Laden got away.

The 19 hijackers applied for and received tourist/student visas. (Thank you, State Department)  Muzzie hijackers Atta, Shehhi, and Jarrah violated the terms of their status and/or overstayed their periods of admission, but SNAFUs and inspectors’ inattention to detail, let them slip through the cracks.

None of that information was passed on to the CIA or George W. Bush, for that matter, thanks to Jamie Gorlick, former Clinton Deputy Attorney General. In 1995, Gorlick wrote a memo directing that counterintelligence efforts be kept separate from criminal intelligence. This action created a wall that prohibited collaboration between agencies like the FBI and the CIA, and  impeded the investigation into Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called “20th hijacker”, (pre-9/11) which could have led to the arrest of the other 19.

The intelligence agencies and Homeland Security had better get their shit together or mark my words, there will be another attack on America that will make 9/11 look like a fucking picnic.



Related Posts:


Related articles:

The Clintons: