Archive for the ‘Leftist moonbats’ Category

Squalling Liberal She-Ass Who Attacked an Elderly Man for Wearing a MAGA Hat, Goes Into Hiding After Backlash

Via Breitbart

 

The Palo Alto woman who drew criticism for launching a campaign to ridicule an elderly man for wearing a Donald Trump “MAGA” campaign hat has disappeared from view and has seemingly gone into hiding.

Early in April, Rebecca Parker Mankey, 46, decided to launch a public shaming of a 74-year-old Jewish man named “Victor F.” in public accounts of his encounter with the woman.

Mankey saw Victor in a Palo Alto Starbucks and took issue with his “Make America Great Again” hat. Calling him a racist and a fascist, Mankey took to social media to attack the elderly man.

“He will never forget me and will think seriously about wearing that hat in my town ever again,” she wrote in one of her posts attacking the man. “If you see him in this hat, please confront him. You do not want to be the person who didn’t speak up as we slipped into fascism.”

Oh, and the bitch got fired from her job, too.

But almost immediately, Mankey experienced a backlash against her social warriorism, so much so that she was fired from her job for attacking the man.

Now it appears that Mankey has gone into hiding, Fox News reports.

The woman has not been at her Palo Alto home for a week and may have moved to Aberdeen, Washington, according to phone records obtained by members of the media.

“We have nothing that makes us think she’s at-risk,” Sgt. Aaron Clark of the Lake County Sheriff’s Office told the San Jose Mercury News. “We’ve determined from the people we’ve talked to that she is voluntarily missing.”

She’s a 46 year old adult and she looks like this. 

 

More:

SF Gate reported Wednesday that the woman, Parker Mankey, photographed the customer wearing a MAGA hat and berated him in front of everyone in Starbucks.

Mankey then doxxed the man in a Monday Facebook post because he wore the red Trump-campaign issued cap.

“He will never forget me and will think seriously about wearing that hat in my town ever again,” she wrote. “If you see him in this hat, please confront him. You do not want to be the person who didn’t speak up as we slipped into fascism.”

……The man wearing the hat, named Victor, told NBC Bay Area that the woman had called him “a Nazi” and tried to entice other Starbucks customers to mock him.

“This woman comes over, and she says ‘Is that a Trump hat?’ I said, ‘I think it is, yes.’ And then she turned to the rest of the audience, the people in Starbucks and said ‘Hey, everybody! Come over here! Let’s get this guy! He’s a hater! I’m calling him out! He hates brown people. He’s a Nazi,’” Victor recalled.

The woman’s post gained so much traction on social media that her employer, Gryphon Strings music store, announced on Facebook Tuesday that it would be terminating her employment.

 

Maybe she jumped off a bridge. We can only hope.

The Left has escalated its political-motivated violence to a new level. It’s time to fight back.

 

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/02/27/woman-who-assaulted-man-wearing-maga-hat-has-been-arrested-and-is-in-country-illegally/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/09/06/leftwing-thug-who-assaulted-kid-and-stole-his-maga-hat-has-been-indicted/

Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter, YouTube Creating ‘Global Censorship Database’

This is the kind of shit that happens under communist and Islamic totalitarian regimes

Via NewsBusters

Social media platforms and Big Tech companies have been slowly working to censor content on their platforms more efficiently.

Emma Llanso, Director of Free Expression at the Center for Democracy and Technology, wrote in an op-ed for Wired that the response to the New Zealand mass shooting in March brought the internet to a terrifying reality. Tech companies have only emphasized more “increasingly centralized and opaque censorship of the global internet.”

Llanso pointed out that Facebook’s announcement detailing plans of countering terrorism is already taking steps towards automatic censorship. The Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism, composed of Facebook, Microsoft, Twitter and YouTube, was launched in 2017 to help sites regulate themselves and remove content that could potentially be illegal. However, the forum has “a shared database of hashes of files identified by the participating companies to be “extreme and egregious” terrorist content.”

Facebook wrote in a blog post on March 18 that it was adding more content to this database. The company stressed “industry cooperation” and wrote that it helpfully “identified abusive content” on other sites.

But Facebook was not alone: Microsoft President Brad Smith wrote that he was interested in building a “safe search engine” that “blocked the accessing of such content at the point when people attempt to view and download it.” Smith emphasized “healthier online environments,” and said that “it doesn’t help when online interaction normalizes in cyberspace standards of behavior that almost all of us would consider unacceptable in the real world.”

Llanso wrote that the hash database suffered from a complete lack of transparency and accountability. “No one outside of the consortium of companies knows what is in the database,” she said. “People whose posts are removed or accounts disabled on participating sites aren’t even notified if the hash database was involved.”

The bleak reality of just how much power these companies have is manifested in the fact that internet service providers in Australia actually blocked websites from users until the websites had removed offending content. In New Zealand, posting blocked content could lead to jail time.

Government censorship plays into this as well. The U.K.’s new proposals for a “regulatory regime” would most likely rely on automatic censorship and blacklist databases in order to satisfy its standards. Countries such as China and Russia already heavily regulate and block automatically online, with no free speech safeguards.

 

The only  “extreme and egregious” terrorist content” they focus on are the conservative viewpoints that rattle their leftwing cages.

Case in point: Conservative pundit Paul Joseph Watson got death threats from a muzzie Facebook page, but according to Facebook it ‘doesn’t violate community standards’.

Lauren Southern, a conservative commentator, was banned from Facebook for 30 days because she posted a comment that criticized the left-leaning hierarchy’s habit of censoring opposing viewpoints. The irony is lost on The Zuck.

Zuck’s minions also  banned links to Zerohedge.

Conservative sites have been suspended over Zuckerberg’s political preferences, but leftie radicalsmuzzie terrorists and their mouthpieces, and videos demonstrating adult sex acts to kids, are relatively unscathed.

Twitter is just as bad. Jack Dorsey’s drones ban people whenever they see something they don’t like.  An undercover video from Project Veritas shows Twitter employees bragging on their censorship skills against conservatives.

Twitter’s co-founder Evan Williams isn’t a fan of free speech. He’s pretty pissed that social media provides an outlet for the patriotic opposition to circumvent liberal control of the main stream media. He says that he ‘was wrong for thinking that the world would be a better place if there was a platform for everyone to freely speak and exchange ideas.’  Really?  Leftwingnuts want to live in a world where everyone listens only to them, on their terms. Last I checked, the 1st amendment guarantees that right to everyone.

One of the ways the Twitter hierarchy has been censoring unwanted political viewpoints is ‘shadow banning’.  Twitter maintains a ‘whitelist’ of favored Twitter accounts and a ‘blacklist’ of unfavored accounts. Accounts on the whitelist are prioritized in search results, accounts on the blacklist have their posts hidden from both search results and other users’ timelines.  The blacklist usually consists of right-leaning posters. Leftwing lunatic fringe, anti-white racists, and muzzie zealots are acceptable. I am constantly being censored on Twitter and Facebook for telling the truth about ‘the religion of peace’. 

Twitter also banned conservative street artist Sabo.

As if that weren’t enough, even conservative employees at Twitter don’t feel safe to express their personal opinions.

Microsoft has jumped on the censorship bandwagon by declaring war on free speech and “offensive language” .

Google thinks the web should be controlled because free speech is unacceptable.

I no longer use their browser. I stick to DuckDuckGo as a search engine and Brave as my main browser. Neither one tracks users.

Gab is an alternative site that promotes and supports free speech. Everything from alt-right to alt-left is permitted. If you don’t like an opinion, you can debate all day without fear of censorship.  I  joined the site in 2016, and I’m very pleased with it.  It’s free to join. I encourage anyone who is fed up with the bullshit at Twitter and Facebook to give it a try. You won’t be disappointed.

There’s an escalating collusion between governments and social media conglomerates with common leftwing agenda. Their mutual jackbooted methods are incredibly oppressive and tyrannical.

It’s happening across Europe; in Germany and Britain in particular. The respective governments have actually made it a crime to criticize the very murderous Islamic ‘culture’ that slaughters their citizens, refuses to assimilate, and has established ‘no-go zones’ and enclaves for their Sharia-based oppression.

If you think the attack on free speech is limited to other countries, think again. It’s happening right here in America.

George Orwell called. He said 1984 is going exactly as he predicted.

 

 

Related article:

https://www.teaparty.org/big-brother-google-unleashes-10000-strong-army-censor-shut-conservatives-youtube-280117/

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/09/24/u-k-police-too-busy-with-internet-hate-speech-as-real-crime-skyrockets/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2018/05/26/british-activist-tommy-robinson-arrested-for-speaking-out-against-muslim-pedophiles/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2016/08/09/british-man-sentenced-for-offending-muzzies-on-facebook/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/facebook-insider-leaks-docs-on-political-targeting-of-conservatives/

Full (Redacted) Mueller Report Released: President Trump Vindicated, Dems Hysterical

 

 

22 months, 500 witnesses, 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, 500 search warrants, and 2,800 subpoenas later, Mueller confirmed what we already knew: No collusion or obstruction.

 

 

Excerpts from AG William Barr’s statement:

I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election.  As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election.  But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter.  That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.

……again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations.  In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking.

The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet.  The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication.  Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps.  The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts.  Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy.  Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.

Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign.  After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.

So that is the bottom line.  After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes.

……After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

……In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context.  President Trump faced an unprecedented situation.  As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates.  At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability.  Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion.  And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks.  Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims.  And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.

Rush Limbaugh:

……This report could have been issued in one page: We found no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign, period, and we don’t have enough to say that there was any obstruction of justice. You could have done this in one page, maybe two, and be done with it.

……“We cannot exonerate.” That’s not the role of the prosecutor. It’s not the role of any investigator. You can’t exonerate somebody, and they can’t exonerate themselves. That’s why verdicts are guilty and not guilty. Not “not guilty” and innocent. Not “not guilty and exonerated.” There’s no such thing.

 

Time to investigate the real criminals:

The Justice Department inspector general is looking into controversial aspects of the FBI and Justice Department’s investigative decisions and tactics; and a Justice Department prosecutor, Utah U.S. attorney John Huber, has a parallel ongoing investigation.

Moreover, Attorney General Barr has indicated that he will be directing an investigation that focuses, among other things, on the factual predicate that purportedly justified the Obama administration’s highly unusual decision to use foreign counterintelligence authorities (and other investigative powers) to scrutinize a political campaign – a probe that would not be limited to the FBI and Justice Department decision-making but that would assess the actions of, for instance, other intelligence agencies. (Note that  former CIA director John Brennan’s own account, he played a key role in spurring the investigation. To say the least, it is highly unusual for the CIA to enmesh itself in a U.S. political campaign.)

 

Right on cue, the media libtards have a complete meltdown:

How are they going to spin this? When you don’t have the facts or the law on your side, you attack the messenger.

And Hollywood reacted with its usual flair:

Capture2

Capture1

 

For over 2 years the Left put Mueller on a pedestal, hoping that he would fulfill their wet dreams of ‘collusion’ and ‘obstruction’ Now that the report proves neither was found, they’re vilifying him.

You want cover ups, snowflakes?

Here’s what should be investigated:

The Russians gave $35 million to a company with John Podesta on the board.

A fake dossier paid for by one political party and its candidate was used by the government to spy on that candidate’s opponent.

The Obama regime’s FISA abuse in order to get permission to wiretap Trump.

James Comey, who is an unscrupulous douchebag, was part and parcel of the conspiracy to undermine the election and overthrow a duly elected president though false allegations and sedition. He also leaked classified information when it suited his purpose and lied to the FISA court.  He also covered for Hillary and refused to prosecute her for her crimes.

Former CIA director John Brennan, colluded with British and Estonian spies to undermine the election.

Hillary’s Uranium One deal with the Russians that netted her $145 million to her corrupt Clinton Foundation.

Mueller is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. He eagerly participated in a wild goose chase of phantom crimes. He should be investigated, as well.

Bottom line: The investigation was a conspiracy to oust a duly elected President on baseless grounds.

 

 

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/muellers-investigation-of-the-fake-russian-collusion-is-over-trump-vindicated-dems-crushed/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/a-compilation-of-laws-broken-by-the-dems-in-their-campaign-against-president-trump/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/a-compilation-of-laws-broken-by-the-dems-in-their-campaign-against-president-trump/

Related articles:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/here-are-the-10-episodes-mueller-investigated-for-obstruction-of-justice-proving-muellers-investigation-was-a-farce/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-department-releases-redacted-version-of-special-counsels-russia-probe-report

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-barr-spars-reporter-trump-mueller-report

https://www.oann.com/redacted-mueller-report-set-to-be-released/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/18/barr-trump-never-asserted-executive-privilege-mueller-report/

President Trump Considers Giving Liberals All the Illegals They Want by Dumping Them in Their ‘Sanctuary Cities’

Hoity-toity affluent liberals get pretty miffed when their manicured communities are invaded by illegals. The rest of us peons are expected to put up with it.

From Fox News

President Trump responded to reports Friday that his administration proposed releasing immigrant detainees in sanctuary cities by not only confirming the plan but saying it remains under “strong” consideration.
Further, the president tweeted that relocating illegal immigrants to these districts should make the “Radical Left” happy.
The comments came after The Washington Post first reported that the White House proposed sending the detainees to sanctuary cities twice in the last six months. The proposal was first floated in November amid reports of a large migrant caravan from Central America making its way to the southern border. The idea was again considered in February, amid the standoff with Congress over a border wall.

……“Due to the fact that Democrats are unwilling to change our very dangerous immigration laws, we are indeed, as reported, giving strong considerations to placing Illegal Immigrants in Sanctuary Cities only,” Trump tweeted.

“The Radical Left always seems to have an Open Borders, Open Arms policy—so this should make them very happy!” he continued.

Trump repeated the remarks later at the White House: “We can give them an unlimited supply…let’s see if they have open arms.”

The president doubled down as Democrats fumed over the relocation idea.

 

It’s brilliant. Since the Dems are always bragging about the adoration they have for illegals, then they can have as many as their bleeding hearts desire, right in their own fucking back yards.

Start with dropping them off at Obama’s new house in the Kalorama neighborhood of Washington D.C.

Looks large enough to fit a few dozen at the residence.

Or Nancy Pelosi’s mansion in California:

I bet she could fit some in there, as well.

Pro-illegal alien Chuckie Schumer lives in a fancy apartment at 9 Park West in New York. It’s no mansion , but I bet one of his walk in closets is large enough to house a small number of Mexican illegals.

 

The ‘sanctuary cities‘ thumb their collective noses at the immigration laws, and give illegals taxpayer-funded benefits like food stamps, welfare, free educationtax creditsmedical care, and housing.

It’s time to send the illegal vermin into the wealthy liberals’ neighborhoods by the busloads.

Any libturd who opens their piehole in support of illegals should be required to back up their bullshit by dealing with the consequences.

 

 

Related article:

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/trump-strongly-considering-placing-illegal-immigrants-in-sanctuary-cities

Ms. Candace Owens Takes the Dems to the Woodshed

Candace Owens, the communications director with Turning Point USA, testified at a House Judiciary Committee hearing on the topic of “white nationalism”.  She let them know that the real problem is Dems’ fear-mongering to “brown people” and keeping minorities “perpetual victims.”

From the Daily Caller

Conservative commentator Candace Owens appeared Tuesday before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on hate crimes and white nationalism.

During the hearing, Democratic California Rep. Ted Lieu said, “Of all the people the Republicans could’ve selected [for the hearing], they pick Candace Owens. I don’t know Miss Owens; I’m not going to characterize her; I’m going to let her own words talk.”

Lieu then held up a cellphone and played a recording of Candace Owens speaking about Adolf Hitler and nationalism, which surfaced online in February.

……“I think it’s pretty apparent that Mr. Lieu believes that black people are stupid and will not pursue the full clip in its entirety,” she started before Democratic House Chairman Jerry Nadler cut her off, saying, “It is not proper to refer disparagingly to a member of the committee. The witness will not do that again.”

Owens responded that she did not refer to [Lieu] as stupid. She clarified that she accused Lieu of purposefully misrepresenting her views by playing a short version of the clip in which she talked about Hitler and not the full clip, which she noted was two hours long.

“I am deeply offended by the insinuation of revealing that clip without the question that was asked of me,” Owens said to Lieu.

Throughout the hearing, Owens spoke about her past experiences with hate crimes, the black community and her transition to conservatism.

Owens mentioned her grandfather, 75, who was sitting directly behind her. “My grandfather grew up on a sharecropping farm in the segregated South. He grew up in an America where words like ‘racism’ and ‘white nationalism’ held real meaning.”

 

 

From Breitbart

 

Owens, who said in her opening remarks that she is a Democrat who supports President Donald Trump, said Democrat policies have harmed blacks.

“The biggest scandal in American politics is that Democrats have been conning minorities into believing we are perpetual victims all but ensuring our failure,” Owens said.

Owens also said the hearing was more about the 2020 election than white nationalism, which she pointed out was much worse in the United States than during the lifetime of her grandfather, who was with her at the hearing.

“He grew up in an America where words like racism and white nationalism held real meaning under the Democrats Jim Crow laws,” Owens said.

“The hearing today is not about white nationalism or hate crimes,” Owens said. “It’s about fear mongering, power and control.”

“It’s a preview of the Democrats’ 2020 strategy,” Owens said.

“Reparations and white nationalism,” Owens said. “That is the Democrats’ preview.”

Later in her remarks, Owens said she has suffered continuous mocking and hatred from Democrats because she is a conservative, including many calling her the N-word and “Uncle Tom.”

She said she came to her conservatism by studying history without the filter Democrats have put on racism in the United States, including the Party’s opposition to ending slavery and its involvement in the Ku Klux Klan and white supremacy.

 

More:

 

……Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO) questioned Candace Owens on Tuesday afternoon during a House congressional hearing on hate crimes and white nationalism, asking Owens if she had ever encountered hateful speech, bigotry, or racism during her encounters and interactions with conservatives.

“I speak in front of conservatives, probably three times a week,” said Owens, “I jump on a stage and I say everything pro-black, and they [conservatives] are so supportive, and they applaud. All they want is for black Americans to realize that they are Americans first and foremost.”

“Conservatives are patriots, the president is a patriot, and I’m a patriot, and there is no skin color in patriotism,” affirmed Owens.

“I am willing to fall on a sword a thousand times for [black Americans] to wake up and realize that we are being lied to, abused, and used by the Democrat Party,” said Owens.

Rep. Buck responded by asking Owens why, then, did the chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary, Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), say in his opening statement that Owens openly associates with “purveyors of hate.”

“Purveyors of hate, by his definition, is anybody that supports the president,” answered Owens, “I support the president because he’s done a tremendous job in helping the black community, despite all of the rhetoric from the media and leftists that do not want him to be successful.”

Owens continued by elaborating on what President Donald Trump has done to help the back community:

“He’s lowered the black unemployment rate, it’s the lowest its every been — I believe the last number I checked was 3.5 million people are off of food stamps, something that the Black Caucus — sat down and didn’t applaud, neither did any of the Democrats applaud, because they want a system where blacks are dependent on the government. They are people that put in place the policies that broke down the black family, and the biggest problem that’s facing our community is father absence. In every room that I’ve been with the president, he talks about real issues, and he doesn’t pander to us, he doesn’t do Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s southern drawl accent and speaking to us like we’re slaves. He asks us important questions, and the most important question he could’ve asked was, ‘black America, what do you have to lose?’ because we were already losing under Democrat leadership.”

……“We’re not talking enough about political hatred in this country,” continued Owens, “we’re not talking enough about conservative activists being attacked, like myself, and we had a student whose dorm was set on fire for being a member of the Turning Point chapter, and all we preach is for free markets and capitalism as a means to lift the most people out of poverty.”

“And, of course, my main thesis is that black people do not have to be Democrats, and we are not owned by the left.”

 

The highlight of the exchange is when she schooled leftwing nutbag Ted Lieu:

 

 

Note that Lieu tried to accuse her of calling a member of the committee “stupid”, when in fact she said, quote:

“I think it’s pretty apparent that Mr. Lieu believes that black people are stupid and will not pursue the full clip in its entirety”.

Which demonstrates how stupid Lieu really is.

She continued:

…… “As I said, he is assuming that black people will not go and pursue the full two-hour clip. He purposefully cut off — and you didn’t hear the question that was asked of me. He’s trying to present as if I was launching a defense of Hitler in Germany, when in fact the question that was presented to me was pertaining to wheher I believed in nationalism, and that nationalism was bad.”

As Owens went on, Lieu tapped his hands together silently.

“And what I responded is that I do not believe we should be characterizing Hitler as a nationalist,” Owens said. “He was a homicidal, psychopathic maniac that killed his own people. A nationalist would not kill their own people. … That was unbelievably dishonest, and he did not allow me to respond to it.”

……”By the way, I would like to also add that I work for Prager University, which is run by an orthodox Jew. Not a single Democrat showed up to the embassy opening in Jerusalem. I sat on a plane for 18 hours to make sure I was there. I am deeply offended by the insinuation of revealing that clip without the question that was asked of me.”

 

The Democrats’ political platform involves hate, rage, and bigotry.

For decades minorities have served as pawns for the DemProgs. They go along with their race-baitingvictimology, the bigotry of low expectations, and racism against whites and their own people for not towing the Party line.

They like keeping blacks on the Democratic party plantation. It gives them a demographic to exploit while mouthing platitudes about evil rich (white) corporate owners versus the workers. The myth of the Left being for the working class and minorities has been wrung for all it’s worth. It’s part and parcel of a party that uses exploitation as a campaign pitch for a target audience; a monolithic, easily manipulated voting bloc that is all too willing to participate. As a matter of fact, the Dems readily admit that throwing the race card is simply  a tactic for political gain.

The Left engages in some of the worst hate speech, violence, and threats on record.

They embrace ‘occupy’ thugs, ‘black lives matter‘ criminals, and ‘antifa‘ malfeasants.  The Dems and the leftwing media own this violence. They foster it, praise it, and support it .

They spew misogynist hatred toward female conservatives, fling racial slurs at black Republicans  and Hispanic Republicans for refusing to be exploited and leaving the Dem plantation.  They especially hate white Republican/Tea Party members and hurl psychotic death threats at them for good measure.

They persecute Christians for refusing to bake gay wedding cakes.

They hate cops, the military, and the American flag.

And no one does racism like the Left.

But they’re liberal bigots, so it’s okay.

Candace Owens is an intelligent, articulate, straightforward, no bullshit pundit and activist. And she happens to be black. She’s the Dems’ worst nightmare.