Full (Redacted) Mueller Report Released: President Trump Vindicated, Dems Hysterical

 

 

22 months, 500 witnesses, 19 lawyers, 40 FBI agents, 500 search warrants, and 2,800 subpoenas later, Mueller confirmed what we already knew: No collusion or obstruction.

 

 

Excerpts from AG William Barr’s statement:

I am sure that all Americans share my concerns about the efforts of the Russian government to interfere in our presidential election.  As the Special Counsel’s report makes clear, the Russian government sought to interfere in our election.  But thanks to the Special Counsel’s thorough investigation, we now know that the Russian operatives who perpetrated these schemes did not have the cooperation of President Trump or the Trump campaign – or the knowing assistance of any other Americans for that matter.  That is something that all Americans can and should be grateful to have confirmed.

……again, the Special Counsel’s report did not find any evidence that members of the Trump campaign or anyone associated with the campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government in its hacking operations.  In other words, there was no evidence of Trump campaign “collusion” with the Russian government’s hacking.

The Special Counsel’s investigation also examined Russian efforts to publish stolen emails and documents on the internet.  The Special Counsel found that, after the GRU disseminated some of the stolen materials through its own controlled entities, DCLeaks and Guccifer 2.0, the GRU transferred some of the stolen materials to Wikileaks for publication.  Wikileaks then made a series of document dumps.  The Special Counsel also investigated whether any member or affiliate of the Trump campaign encouraged or otherwise played a role in these dissemination efforts.  Under applicable law, publication of these types of materials would not be criminal unless the publisher also participated in the underlying hacking conspiracy.  Here too, the Special Counsel’s report did not find that any person associated with the Trump campaign illegally participated in the dissemination of the materials.

Finally, the Special Counsel investigated a number of “links” or “contacts” between Trump Campaign officials and individuals connected with the Russian government during the 2016 presidential campaign.  After reviewing those contacts, the Special Counsel did not find any conspiracy to violate U.S. law involving Russia-linked persons and any persons associated with the Trump campaign.

So that is the bottom line.  After nearly two years of investigation, thousands of subpoenas, and hundreds of warrants and witness interviews, the Special Counsel confirmed that the Russian government sponsored efforts to illegally interfere with the 2016 presidential election but did not find that the Trump campaign or other Americans colluded in those schemes.

……After carefully reviewing the facts and legal theories outlined in the report, and in consultation with the Office of Legal Counsel and other Department lawyers, the Deputy Attorney General and I concluded that the evidence developed by the Special Counsel is not sufficient to establish that the President committed an obstruction-of-justice offense.

……In assessing the President’s actions discussed in the report, it is important to bear in mind the context.  President Trump faced an unprecedented situation.  As he entered into office, and sought to perform his responsibilities as President, federal agents and prosecutors were scrutinizing his conduct before and after taking office, and the conduct of some of his associates.  At the same time, there was relentless speculation in the news media about the President’s personal culpability.  Yet, as he said from the beginning, there was in fact no collusion.  And as the Special Counsel’s report acknowledges, there is substantial evidence to show that the President was frustrated and angered by a sincere belief that the investigation was undermining his presidency, propelled by his political opponents, and fueled by illegal leaks.  Nonetheless, the White House fully cooperated with the Special Counsel’s investigation, providing unfettered access to campaign and White House documents, directing senior aides to testify freely, and asserting no privilege claims.  And at the same time, the President took no act that in fact deprived the Special Counsel of the documents and witnesses necessary to complete his investigation. Apart from whether the acts were obstructive, this evidence of non-corrupt motives weighs heavily against any allegation that the President had a corrupt intent to obstruct the investigation.

Rush Limbaugh:

……This report could have been issued in one page: We found no evidence of collusion between the Russians and the Trump campaign, period, and we don’t have enough to say that there was any obstruction of justice. You could have done this in one page, maybe two, and be done with it.

……“We cannot exonerate.” That’s not the role of the prosecutor. It’s not the role of any investigator. You can’t exonerate somebody, and they can’t exonerate themselves. That’s why verdicts are guilty and not guilty. Not “not guilty” and innocent. Not “not guilty and exonerated.” There’s no such thing.

 

Time to investigate the real criminals:

The Justice Department inspector general is looking into controversial aspects of the FBI and Justice Department’s investigative decisions and tactics; and a Justice Department prosecutor, Utah U.S. attorney John Huber, has a parallel ongoing investigation.

Moreover, Attorney General Barr has indicated that he will be directing an investigation that focuses, among other things, on the factual predicate that purportedly justified the Obama administration’s highly unusual decision to use foreign counterintelligence authorities (and other investigative powers) to scrutinize a political campaign – a probe that would not be limited to the FBI and Justice Department decision-making but that would assess the actions of, for instance, other intelligence agencies. (Note that  former CIA director John Brennan’s own account, he played a key role in spurring the investigation. To say the least, it is highly unusual for the CIA to enmesh itself in a U.S. political campaign.)

 

Right on cue, the media libtards have a complete meltdown:

How are they going to spin this? When you don’t have the facts or the law on your side, you attack the messenger.

And Hollywood reacted with its usual flair:

Capture2

Capture1

 

For over 2 years the Left put Mueller on a pedestal, hoping that he would fulfill their wet dreams of ‘collusion’ and ‘obstruction’ Now that the report proves neither was found, they’re vilifying him.

You want cover ups, snowflakes?

Here’s what should be investigated:

The Russians gave $35 million to a company with John Podesta on the board.

A fake dossier paid for by one political party and its candidate was used by the government to spy on that candidate’s opponent.

The Obama regime’s FISA abuse in order to get permission to wiretap Trump.

James Comey, who is an unscrupulous douchebag, was part and parcel of the conspiracy to undermine the election and overthrow a duly elected president though false allegations and sedition. He also leaked classified information when it suited his purpose and lied to the FISA court.  He also covered for Hillary and refused to prosecute her for her crimes.

Former CIA director John Brennan, colluded with British and Estonian spies to undermine the election.

Hillary’s Uranium One deal with the Russians that netted her $145 million to her corrupt Clinton Foundation.

Mueller is as crooked as a dog’s hind leg. He eagerly participated in a wild goose chase of phantom crimes. He should be investigated, as well.

Bottom line: The investigation was a conspiracy to oust a duly elected President on baseless grounds.

 

 

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/25/muellers-investigation-of-the-fake-russian-collusion-is-over-trump-vindicated-dems-crushed/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/a-compilation-of-laws-broken-by-the-dems-in-their-campaign-against-president-trump/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2019/03/10/a-compilation-of-laws-broken-by-the-dems-in-their-campaign-against-president-trump/

Related articles:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/04/here-are-the-10-episodes-mueller-investigated-for-obstruction-of-justice-proving-muellers-investigation-was-a-farce/

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/justice-department-releases-redacted-version-of-special-counsels-russia-probe-report

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ag-barr-spars-reporter-trump-mueller-report

https://www.oann.com/redacted-mueller-report-set-to-be-released/

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/04/18/barr-trump-never-asserted-executive-privilege-mueller-report/

Leave a comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: