Another Terrorist Attack in New York City by a ‘Peaceful’ Muzzie ‘Immigrant’

An ‘immigrant’ from Bangladesh pulled an ISIS-inspired terrorist attack at the NYC Port Authority.

 

 

From Fox News

A Bangladeshi national living in Brooklyn prematurely detonated his “low tech device” in an “attempted terrorist attack” inside New York City’s Port Authority bus terminal Monday morning — a blast that rocked the city during rush hour, causing chaos and halting several subway lines.

Akayed Ullah, 27, set off the “effectively low tech device” in a subway passageway just before 7:30 a.m….  Ullah suffered burns and wounds to his body and appeared to be the only person seriously injured in the pipe bomb explosion, authorities said. At least three other people suffered injuries that were not life threatening.

……Ullah’s attack was inspired by ISIS, law enforcement sources told The New York Post. The suspect allegedly packed the 5-inch metal pipe bomb and battery pack into the right side of his jacket, but the device exploded earlier than intended. The suspect told police he made the bomb at the electrical company where he works, The New York Post reported.

 

 

An NYPD source on the scene told Fox News a device went off, and there was a bomb strapped to a person. Port Authority police took down the suspected bomber at gunpoint, Port Authority Police Benevolent Association tweeted.

President Donald Trump was briefed on the incident, White House Press Secretary Sarah Sanders tweeted.

……If the attack is confirmed to be ISIS-inspired, it would be the second ISIS-inspired attack in New York City in less than two months. An Oct. 31 terror attack killed eight people and injured 11 others after a man drove a rented truck into people walking and cycling on a bike path in Lower Manhattan.

They should take him out to the middle of nowhere, strap a good bomb on his ass, and finish the job.

Advertisements

John Derbyshire’s OpEd, ‘The Talk: Nonblack Version’ vs Ekow N. Yankah’s OpEd, ‘Can My Children Be Friends With White People?’

The NYT published another piece of tripe from a black law professor who opined whether or not his children can be friends with white people:

“Donald Trump’s election has made it clear that I will teach my boys the lesson generations old, one that I for the most part nearly escaped. I will teach them to be cautious, I will teach them suspicion, and I will teach them distrust,” Yankah wrote. “Much sooner than I thought I would, I will have to discuss with my boys whether they can truly be friends with white people.”

“In the coming years, when my boys ask again their questions about who can be their best friend, I pray for a more hopeful answer,” he concluded.

 

Aside from injecting the usual false ‘racist’ label to Donald Trump simply because they don’t like him and they miss their corrupt, divisive, black messiah, this is typical of leftwing activists who don’t get their way in elections.  BTW:  Race pimps Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton once sang Trump’s praises.

Here’s a counterpoint by John Derbyshire that was written during the Obama regime in 2012:

(EXCERPTS)

There is much talk about “the talk.”

“Sean O’Reilly was 16 when his mother gave him the talk that most black parents give their teenage sons,” Denisa R. Superville of the Hackensack (NJ) Record tells us.  Meanwhile, down in Atlanta: “Her sons were 12 and 8 when Marlyn Tillman realized it was time for her to have the talk,” Gracie Bonds Staples writes in the Fort Worth Star-Telegram.

Leonard Greene talks about the talk in the New York Post. Someone bylined as KJ Dell’Antonia talks about the talk in The New York TimesDarryl Owens talks about the talk in the Orlando Sentinel.

Yes, talk about the talk is all over.

There is a talk that nonblack Americans have with their kids, too. My own kids, now 19 and 16, have had it in bits and pieces as subtopics have arisen. If I were to assemble it into a single talk, it would look something like the following.

(1) Among your fellow citizens are forty million who identify as black, and whom I shall refer to as black. The cumbersome (and MLK-noncompliant) term “African-American” seems to be in decline, thank goodness. “Colored” and “Negro” are archaisms. What you must call “the ‘N’ word” is used freely among blacks but is taboo to nonblacks.

“There is a talk that nonblack Americans have with their kids, too.”

(2) American blacks are descended from West African populations, with some white and aboriginal-American admixture. The overall average of non-African admixture is 20-25 percent. The admixture distribution is nonlinear, though: “It seems that around 10 percent of the African American population is more than half European in ancestry.” (Same link.)

(3) Your own ancestry is mixed north-European and northeast-Asian, but blacks will take you to be white.

(4) The default principle in everyday personal encounters is, that as a fellow citizen, with the same rights and obligations as yourself, any individual black is entitled to the same courtesies you would extend to a nonblack citizen. That is basic good manners and good citizenship. In some unusual circumstances, however—e.g., paragraph (10h) below—this default principle should be overridden by considerations of personal safety.

……(6) As you go through life, however, you will experience an ever larger number of encounters with black Americans. Assuming your encounters are random—for example, not restricted only to black convicted murderers or to black investment bankers—the Law of Large Numbers will inevitably kick in. You will observe that the means—the averages—of many traits are very different for black and white Americans, as has been confirmed by methodical inquiries in the human sciences.

(7) Of most importance to your personal safety are the very different means for antisocial behavior, which you will see reflected in, for instance, school disciplinary measurespolitical corruption, and criminal convictions.

(8) These differences are magnified by the hostility many blacks feel toward whites. Thus, while black-on-black behavior is more antisocial in the average than is white-on-white behavior, average black-on-white behavior is a degree more antisocial yet.

(9) A small cohort of blacks—in my experience, around five percent—is ferociously hostile to whites and will go to great lengths to inconvenience or harm us. A much larger cohort of blacks—around half—will go along passively if the five percent take leadership in some event. They will do this out of racial solidarity, the natural willingness of most human beings to be led, and a vague feeling that whites have it coming.

(10) Thus, while always attentive to the particular qualities of individuals, on the many occasions where you have nothing to guide you but knowledge of those mean differences, use statistical common sense:

(10a) Avoid concentrations of blacks not all known to you personally.

(10b) Stay out of heavily black neighborhoods.

(10c) If planning a trip to a beach or amusement park at some date, find out whether it is likely to be swamped with blacks on that date (neglect of that one got me the closest I have ever gotten to death by gunshot).

(10d) Do not attend events likely to draw a lot of blacks.

(10e) If you are at some public event at which the number of blacks suddenly swells, leave as quickly as possible.

(10f) Do not settle in a district or municipality run by black politicians.

(10g) Before voting for a black politician, scrutinize his/her character much more carefully than you would a white.

(10h) Do not act the Good Samaritan to blacks in apparent distress, e.g., on the highway.

(10i) If accosted by a strange black in the street, smile and say something polite but keep moving.

(11) The mean intelligence of blacks is much lower than for whites. The least intelligent ten percent of whites have IQs below 81; forty percent of blacks have IQs that low. Only one black in six is more intelligent than the average white; five whites out of six are more intelligent than the average black. These differences show in every test of general cognitive ability that anyone, of any race or nationality, has yet been able to devise. They are reflected in countless everyday situations. “Life is an IQ test.”

(12) There is a magnifying effect here, too, caused by affirmative action. In a pure meritocracy there would be very low proportions of blacks in cognitively demanding jobs. Because of affirmative action, the proportions are higher. In government work, they are very high. Thus, in those encounters with strangers that involve cognitive engagement, ceteris paribus the black stranger will be less intelligent than the white. In such encounters, therefore—for example, at a government office—you will, on average, be dealt with more competently by a white than by a black. If that hostility-based magnifying effect (paragraph 8) is also in play, you will be dealt with more politely, too. “The DMV lady“ is a statistical truth, not a myth.

……You don’t have to follow my version of the talk point for point; but if you are white or Asian and have kids, you owe it to them to give them some version of the talk. It will save them a lot of time and trouble spent figuring things out for themselves. It may save their lives.

 

There’s always two sides to the story; something the liberal media conveniently ignores in the modern age of black radical extremists .

My take on race and ‘privilege’ is here: Co-founder of ‘Black Lives Matter’ in Louisville Posts a List of ‘Reparations’ That Suggests White People Give Away Their Homes and Money

There are valid reasons for racial tension in America, and whitey doesn’t have a corner on that market.  Newsflash for Yankah: The feelings are mutual, bro.

Hey Liberals, Should I Gloat Over California Going Up in Flames?

Remember how overjoyed liberals were during Hurricane Harvey because it damaged the homes and lives of “Trump supporters”?

Let’s recap:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Now that California is being burnt to a crisp, I should say something like “I hope the entire cesspool of liberals and illegals gets incinerated in short order”, but I won’t.

 

 

 

 

 

Related articles:

https://patriotbeat.com/2017/08/30/sick-nasty-liberals-are-celebrating-trump-voters-being-victims-of-hurricane-harvey/

http://yournewswire.com/jennifer-lawrence-god-trump-hurricane/

https://downtrend.com/donn-marten/liberal-actress-suggests-hurricanes-are-punishment-for-trumps-election

Obama Used Brits To Spy On Donald Trump

Via John Nolte at Daily Wire

 

While the American Intelligence Community (IC) plays “not us” when it comes to claims that the Obama Administration spied on President Trump (when he was both a candidate and President-elect), Fox News has learned that in order to avoid a paper trail, fingerprints, and pesky little details like the Bill of Rights, President Obama circumvented all of that by requesting the British spy on Trump.

Appearing on Fox News this morning, Judge Andrew Napolitano dropped this bombshell that could finally help to explain a whole lot, including a January 19 New York Times report about the Obama White House looking at intelligence information based on “wiretaps”…

Here’s part of the Napolitano transcript:

“Three intelligence sources have informed Fox News that President Obama went outside the chain of command. He didn’t use the NSA, he didn’t use the CIA, he didn’t use the FBI, and he didn’t use the Department of Justice… He used GCHQ. What the heck is GCHQ? That’s the initials for the British spying agency. They have 24/7 access to the NSA database. So by simply having two people go to them and say ‘President Obama needs transcripts of conversations involving Candidate Trump, conversations involving President-Elect Trump,’ [Obama’s] able to get it, and there’s no American fingerprints on this.”

During an appearance last night on Fox News, Napolitano went into greater detail to explain exactly how this would work. Basically, our NSA has access to pretty much every phone call. This is how they collect all that metadata. If they wish, however, they “can actually download into digital form the conversations and the texts” and turn it into transcripts. Through our NSA, the British have 24/7 access to that same capability.

In other words, according to these sources, Obama tapped into a wiretap that is already in place on pretty much all of us, including Trump and his team. It is only accessed, though, when there is a specific request from someone like the President of the United States. Napolitano also explained that the law allows the President to legally do this to anyone he wants for any reason he wants. No warrant required.

I should add that as of last night, all Napolitano reported was that Obama had this capability. He did not say his sources claimed the Obama Administration had actually done this.

As of this morning, however, three sources say this is exactly what Obama did, which would help to finally make sense of this New York Times report from January 19 – a report that clearly stated the Obama White House was receiving reports from Trump wiretaps”:

Wiretapped Data Used In Inquiry of Trump Aides …

The F.B.I. is leading the investigations, aided by the National Security Agency, the C.I.A. and the Treasury Department’s financial crimes unit. The investigators have accelerated their efforts in recent weeks but have found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing, the officials said. One official said intelligence reports based on some of the wiretapped communications had been provided to the White House.

Remember, prior to Trump breaking this story wide open with his Tweets about the Obama Administration spying on him, in order to make this phony RussiaGate story appear serious, our corrupt mainstream media was eager to make it look as though the Obama Administration was investigating Trump, including, as you can see in The New York Times story above, through wiretaps.

Obviously, now that this approach has backfired on their Precious Barry, the media is playing Nevermind.

 

The main purpose was to fabricate  “evidence” of collusion between Trump’s campaign and the Russians. Obama used wiretaps for that purpose.  It was purely an act of sedition. They found no wrong doing, and won’t admit to the wiretaps or the lack of evidence.

Over eight years of his regime, Obama was pretty prolific with the wiretaps.

Obama, Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice, and James Comey all had a hand in the illegal wiretaps and much more. They should all be prosecuted.

Here’s the collusion: Former MI6 operative, Christopher Steele, was hired by Fusion GPS, a corporate espionage firm, to dig up dirt on Trump but came up with a fabricated smear instead. Not deterred by the total implausibility of the story described in the dossier, GPS shopped the dossier to the liberal media and paid journos to feed the fake story to the press with predicable results; the left wing morons at Buzzfeed and  CNN  jumped at the chance to print the fake news.  The FBI even offered $50,000 to Steele for information.

The Obama regime paid almost one million dollars to the same law firm that funneled money to GPS.  Somewhere in that clusterfuck is RINO John McCain,  who received the dossier from a former British ambassador to Moscow.

Glenn Simpson, GPS co-founder,  was questioned in a closed door hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee. Meanwhile, the committee hasn’t yet decided wither to release the testimony.

This 3-peckered goat screw comes to you courtesy of the Democrats, who have reached the bottom and keep digging.

 

 

Related posts:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/10/19/firm-that-helped-fabricate-fake-trump-dossier-refuses-to-answer-questions-before-house-intelligence-committee/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/01/14/fake-dossier-about-donald-trump-made-quite-a-bizarre-journey/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/04/19/fbi-relied-on-lurid-debunked-dossier-to-target-trump-aides/

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/09/27/obama-regime-used-russian-collusion-lie-to-cover-his-weaponizing-of-intelligence-agencies-against-u-s-citizens/

 

Related articles:

http://www.dailywire.com/news/14546/trump-exonerated-msm-stands-reports-obama-admins-john-nolte

http://canadafreepress.com/article/british-role-confirmed-in-trump-spying-scandal

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/07/27/congressional-testimony-the-russians-paid-fusion-gps-to-generate-the-golden-shower-trump-dossier/

Common Sense Prevails: Parents Fight Off Attempt to Allow Children to ‘Self Identify’ Gender

Via Breitbart

Parents and family groups have succeeded in putting a halt to a proposed rule in Delaware that would have allowed children in grades K-12 to self-identify as a gender or race without the consent of their parents.

According to the text of Regulation 225 – referred to as an “anti-discrimination” regulation – Delaware school officials may not wish to trust parents with the information their child wants to identify as the opposite biological sex or a different race, if those parents are not fully on board with their child’s decision.

……“Policies like Regulation 225 are setting parents up as a ‘non-ally’ and ‘unsupportive,’ discriminatory, even abusive, if they affirm their child’s biological realities and work through it instead of embracing the confusion,” states Delaware Family Policy Council – which spearheaded opposition to the rule.

The group continues that while all children should be treated with respect, and gender-confused children should receive “compassionate accommodations,” the rule obstructs “the right of parents to care for their children without government intrusion.”

Within the liberal public school system that’s been he case for a while.  The State knows how to raise your children better than you, and don’t you forget it. Including labeling restrooms that project their insane ideas on ‘gender identity’, and ‘transgender’.

……Most state House Republicans – 14 of 16 members – sent a letter to Delaware Secretary of Education Susan Bunting last month, urging her to reject the statewide regulation and allow local school districts to handle related issues as they see fit.

More parents of all political stripes are dismissing the claims of LGBT activists – often funded by wealthy progressive philanthropists – who accuse them of bigotry and discrimination for not accepting an ideology that rejects the scientific fact of the existence of two biological sexes – male and female.

 

Children don’t have the capacity to understand the complexities of sex, gender, or the asinine projections of the Left.

 

 

 

 

Related post:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2017/10/16/police-called-to-new-jersey-elementary-school-because-child-made-a-comment-about-the-brownies-being-served-to-the-class/