Liberals Tweet Death Threats to 12 Year Old CJ Pearson for Conservative Opinions

It takes a special kind of liberal shitbag to threaten a 12 year old kid because of his political stance. But then, they’re all shitbags. Stay classy LeftProgs.


CJ Pearson is a young activist with more intelligence and common sense than many people three times his age.  This 12 year old is one of the most articulate, smart, no-nonsense kids on the planet. Since the age of 8, he has considered himself conservative.  He’s been involved in political action that would put most adults to shame. I first heard of him when he reiterated Rudy Giuliani’s truthful assertion that Obama really doesn’t love this country.

Well, after he gained notoriety, the filthy libtards came crawling out of the woodwork with epithets and death threats.  This is the latest round of liberal douchebaggery.

From The Examiner.

On Friday, CJ Pearson, a 12-year-old Georgia conservative who made news with a viral video questioning President Obama’s love of the United States, announced on Facebook that he and his family had been the target of threats on Twitter. Pearson told Examiner that he’s physically okay, but is “distraught” from the threat.

“I had a horribly rough night on Twitter after a woman not only threatened to sue me for expressing my opinions but threatened my family,” he said. “At this point, I’ve decided that it’s best for me to take a step back and evaluate all of my options before continuing down this path.”

“In the meantime, I do have a team that will be monitoring my social networks while I take some time to spend with my family,” he added. “Please keep me in your prayers.”

That team, Vice and Victory, posted screenshots of the threatening tweets Pearson received. On Friday, Vice and Victory’s Ali A. Akbar posted a message on Twitter asking for information regarding the identity of the person or persons who sent the messages.

The messages come from an individual using the twitter handle “Mona Hussein Obama,” which clearly appears to be a fake name. The account goes by the name @MonaB2010, and as of this writing, is protected. “Obama” says she is “left to the left of Dems/libs.” The account also notes: “I abuse and block all GOP/KKK/Teabaggers.”Apparently, abuse is what she had in mind Thursday night. In one tweet, she told Pearson: “[A]ll your supporters are RWNJs … Racist Teabagger southern cons. I pray your fam is next to be killed.”

I tweeted this to the scrunt:

You liberal douchebaggers have a lot of class…sending death threats to a 12 year old kid because of his conservative opinions.

In another tweet, she told Pearson that the GOP needed to “denounce” him if he wasn’t an official. “Otherwise,” Obama said, “we go for the lawsuit.” She also told Pearson she would file a lawsuit on Tuesday.

A newsflash for the bitch: her wet dream of a lawsuit won’t hold up in court. He’s expressing a political opinion, which is his right.

A search of Twitter found three accounts using the name “Mona Hussein Obama.” One account uses the name @MonaB2011 and claims to belong to a progressive, socialist, former Republican. The third account uses the name @racistmona and as of this writing, had only one profane tweet. It is unknown if the accounts are related. Moreover, Twitter’s rules and federal law strictly forbid online threats.

She is definitely not a “former Republican”. That’s a commonly used tactic by lefties to make people think they had some kind of epiphany and in their disillusionment, ran to the other side of the political spectrum.

Here’s a Twitter site backing CJ:

It’s time to shove their own malfeasance up their ass.

Cultural Fascism: Christians Now Persecuted in America

This was bound to happen. I’m agnostic, and even I can see the cultural fascism taking hold in this country.

A lot of this persecution started long before the unconstitutional Supreme Court travesty.

From Fox News.

Two Christian ministers who own an Idaho wedding chapel were told they had to either perform same-sex weddings or face jail time and up to a $1,000 fine, according to a lawsuit filed Friday in federal court.

The owners of a small family farm in upstate New York were fined $13,000 for discriminating against a same-sex couple for refusing to host a wedding on their own property. They were also required to attend staff re-education training classes to teach the state’s viewpoint on marriage. They’re fighting back.

A family owned bakery was ordered to make wedding cakes for gay couples and guarantee that its staff be given comprehensive training on Colorado’s anti-discrimination laws. He chose to stop making wedding cakes altogether.

“Re-education”. “Sensitivity training”.

Just like the ‘re-education camps’ in communist countries.

Well, what’s good for the gay goose is good for the gander:
A Colorado man has filed a religious discrimination complaint against a Denver bakery for refusing to write anti-gay slogans on a Bible-shaped cake.

Heterosexuals who try to order their own customized cakes from gay owned bakeries are met with expletive-laden tirades. So much for tolerance.

Anti-Christian discrimination has infected businesses, media, governments across the U.S.:

WND reported in August 2011 on the Houston, Texas, veterans’ cemetery director who issued an order banning God from military or veteran funerals at the facility.

WND reported in February that the city of New York was attempting to cancel the leases of all church and religious groups renting city facilities.

A leftwingnut reporter from an obscure ABC affiliate in Indiana, honed in on a pizza business in Walkerton she knew wouldn’t cater gay weddings. The town has a population of 2000, so you know the broad went to great lengths to seek out and find one little mom and pop pizzeria in one little town that she could set up for her embellished story.  After the story hit the airwaves, the Left ran up and down the field yelling ‘bigot’! into their megaphone, and issuing death threats to the pizza shop owners.

From the Mozilla CEO,  to the military, to Duck Dynasty, to Chick-fil-A, to straight athletes who are punished for the audacity of using their freedom of speech to counter the PC crap,  the gay mafia has tried to stamp out any opposing viewpoint.

The CEO of dating service, who raised a stink over Mozilla’s Firefox CEO’s past support of Proposition 8, once made a donatation to an anti-gay congressman.   His excuse? He claimed ignorance. There was no public outcry. No calls for boycott. No media blitz.

And as liberal hypocrisy goes, it’s the usual bullshit.  The lesson:  If you express an opinion that doesn’t jive with the liberal meme, prepare for an onslaught of spleen-venting hostility.

Representatives of the homosexual community are the worst. Liberals want to define  ‘diversity’  in their own exclusive terms. Step outside the box, and you’ll witness some of the most gawd awful bigotry and hate speech you’ve ever seen.

In 2012 Dan Savage, (love the name) Obama pal, and founder of the “It Gets Better” project, an “anti-bullying” campaign, delivered a speech to high school students at the National High School Journalism Conference.  His speech quickly devolved into an anti-Christian diatribe laced with vulgar obscenities, sexual remarks, and insults toward people who didn’t care for his unprovoked hostility.

The Left engages in some of the worst hate speech, violence, and threats on record. Their  behavior says more about their bigotry than any claim of ‘tolerance’.

The Gaystapo is pretty  hateful and intolerant of opposing viewpoints, Christianity in particular.

This is an infringement on the rights of others to voice their own opinions and exercise their own right to associate and do business with whom they choose.

They first asked for tolerance. Then they expected acceptance. Then they demanded participation. Lastly, they sued for punishment.



Related post:

Related articles:

‘Black Lives Matter’ Pissed About All the Attention Paid to Homosexual Marriage

Liberal gays stealing the thunder of black militants. You just can’t make up that shit.

From Twitchy.

It looks like the #BlackLivesMatters movement isn’t too happy with the country’s new focus on gay marriage.

Ted Cruz: Time to Rein In an Unconstitutional Supreme Court

From his column at the National Review.

This week, we have twice seen Supreme Court justices violating their judicial oaths. Yesterday, the justices rewrote Obamacare, yet again, in order to force this failed law on the American people. Today, the Court doubled down with a 5–4 opinion that undermines not just the definition of marriage, but the very foundations of our representative form of government. Both decisions were judicial activism, plain and simple. Both were lawless.

As Justice Scalia put it regarding Obamacare, “Words no longer have meaning if an Exchange that is not established by a State is ‘established by the State.’ . . . We should start calling this law SCOTUSCare.” And as he observed regarding marriage, “Today’s decree says that . . . the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court.” Sadly, the political reaction from the leaders of my party is all too predictable. They will pretend to be incensed, and then plan to do absolutely nothing. That is unacceptable. On the substantive front, I have already introduced a constitutional amendment to preserve the authority of elected state legislatures to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman, and also legislation stripping the federal courts of jurisdiction over legal assaults on marriage. And the 2016 election has now been transformed into a referendum on Obamacare; in 2017, I believe, a Republican president will sign legislation finally repealing that disastrous law.

……Not only are the Court’s opinions untethered to reason and logic, they are also alien to our constitutional system of limited and divided government. By redefining the meaning of common words, and redesigning the most basic human institutions, this Court has crossed from the realm of activism into the arena of oligarchy. This week’s opinions are but the latest in a long line of judicial assaults on our Constitution and the common-sense values that have made America great

……The Framers of our Constitution, despite their foresight and wisdom, did not anticipate judicial tyranny on this scale. The Constitution explicitly provides that justices “shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour,” and this is a standard they are not remotely meeting. The Framers thought Congress’s “power of instituting impeachments,” as Alexander Hamilton argued in the Federalist Papers, would be an “important constitutional check” on the judicial branch and would provide “a complete security” against the justices’ “deliberate usurpations of the authority of the legislature.”

But the Framers underestimated the justices’ craving for legislative power, and they overestimated the Congress’s backbone to curb it. It was clear even before the end of the founding era that the threat of impeachment was, in Thomas Jefferson’s words, “not even a scarecrow” to the justices. Today, the remedy of impeachment — the only one provided under our Constitution to cure judicial tyranny — is still no remedy at all. A Senate that cannot muster 51 votes to block an attorney-general nominee openly committed to continue an unprecedented course of executive-branch lawlessness can hardly be expected to muster the 67 votes needed to impeach an Anthony Kennedy.

……Rendering the justices directly accountable to the people would provide such a remedy. Twenty states have now adopted some form of judicial retention elections, and the experience of these states demonstrates that giving the people the regular, periodic power to pass judgment on the judgments of their judges strikes a proper balance between judicial independence and judicial accountability. It also restores respect for the rule of law to courts that have systematically imposed their personal moral values in the guise of constitutional rulings.

As I said:

The homosexual marriage decision was not based on the Constitution, but rather how the liberal justices felt about it.

IAW the Constitution, Congress passes laws. The Supreme Court interprets the law. There has been no law passed by Congress legalizing same-sex marriage in all 50 states.  Therefore, it’s a states rights’ issue….

What 5 robed judges did was make an unconstitutional  law. So what happens if a state decides to stand up for its rights and continue its ban on homosexual marriage by interpreting the ruling as “they’re allowed to, but there’s no law passed by Congress that can force us to concur.” Remember, this ruling does not reflect any law passed by Congress.  

The same thing happened with the ruling on the ObamaCare subsidies.

Congress doesn’t always stick with the Constitution, either. The Dems pushed through an oppressive, unconstitutional law, the SCOTUS ruled against the individual government mandate but upheld it as a tax. Which essentially left the unconstitutional law in place.

With this latest travesty, the taxpayer will be fleeced even more. The impact on the taxpayer and the national debt: 18 new taxes and penalties and an additional  $1.8 trillion over the next decade added to the national debt.

The SCOTUS figures that subsidies which accompany a law, albeit unconstitutional, which was amended and changed at the whim of a wannabe Emperor, should be upheld because otherwise “state exchanges would drown in a “death spiral.”  And without the subsidies to go with ObamaCare, John Roberts wrote, it is implausible that Congress meant the Act to operate in this manner.”

The DemProg majority that held power in 2010 meant it to operate this way; certainly not the GOP opponents nor the American people who are vehemently against it. The SCOTUS has slapped the face of the people.

The liberal malfeasants on the SCOTUS violated the rights of the people to debate, decide, and govern.

Time to drain the swamp.


Rush Limbaugh on the RINO Psyche



From Rush

Now, see if this makes any sense to you. Real Clear Politics, they have this rolling series of polls. Obama job approval today: 44 percent. Disapprove: 51 percent. Direction of the country, right direction: 28 percent. On the wrong track: 63 percent. Does any of that make sense with what is happening in the country? Sixty-three percent think the country is on the wrong track, yet we’re told that there’s massive support for the court’s gay marriage decision and Obamacare being upheld and so forth.

I’m here to tell you, you think that you’re in the minority. You are not. You are actually in a pretty sizable majority that doesn’t have any real leadership or strategy or pushback or plan. I mean, they’re helping Obama pass trade bills. They’re thinking about joining Obama on amnesty and have been for a while. They don’t want to speak up on gay marriage in any shape, way, manner or form. They don’t want to object, go to court.

You’re voting in record numbers. You’re voting in landslide numbers, landslide victories in 2010 and 2014. You’re being pushed around by, in one instance, less than two percent of the population. It’s totally understandable if you think you’re losing your mind. It’s totally understandable if you’re asking what the heck’s going on. You’re not by any stretch of the imagination alone. You’re actually with a pretty big majority and there’s more polling data than just this to indicate it.

Bottom line: The GOP rank and file is dicked up.

The Republican party has collapsed into mush; they’re so afraid of ‘offending’ someone and taking the steps necessary to get this country back, it’s pathetic. They’re out of touch with the grassroots. They’ve forgotten the reason why we elected them to a majority; we wanted them to stop B. Hussein and his socialist Frankenstein dead in their fucking tracks. We want a return to the principles outlined by the founders. We the People are more than just the opening words in the U.S. Constitution, it’s a reminder that they are sworn to serve the citizenry, not the other way around. They’re tasked with the providing the nation’s security and maintaining individual and civil liberties. Instead, they sit on the sidelines, or in some cases, jump into the political sack with toxic DemProgs who have a visceral hatred of America and have made it their life’s work to subvert the fabric of the United States and the freedoms of its citizens.

……The answer could be no more complicated than RINO Republicans and Democrats have one thing in common, and it isn’t big government. It’s fear of and hatred of conservatives as a political force.

……There has to be a reason why RINO Republicans would stand idly by — and if not stand idly by, would join Obama and the Democrats here and there to further the Democrat agenda. I really think if you do believe that, that the explanation for it is the one thing they have in common is a fear of or hatred of or dislike of or what have you, us. Conservatives. Because another thing they all have in common is they love big government.  They want big government. They want big government getting bigger. They want bigger government swelling with more and more money. They want power and control over the money. They want to be able to dip their own hands into that pile of money and take out whatever they want for themselves. And conservatives, of course, want to do away with that. Conservatives want to make government smaller. We want to get rid of all the debt.

The GOP  villifiesinsults, and denigrates faithful grassroot Republicans and Tea Party Patriots for holding them accountable and demanding that they fulfill the promises they made. We expect that kind of filth from LeftProg Dems; not from our Republican representatives. The majority of the seats gained by the GOP in the House in 2010, was due in large part to the Tea Party movement; a fact that escapes their selective memories. We also had considerable influence in the 2014 mid-terms.

Instead of doing what we elected them to do, they cave in to the petty little tyrant in the White House and his tools in the Democratic Party.

……How many times can you recall the Democrats have won a presidential election and here comes a Supreme Court justice or a federal court appointment somewhere of a genuinely radical, practically communist judge, and your average Republican senator will say, “Well, the Republicans lost the election. The Democrats won and they get their nominees.”

When the Democrats lose elections, they push back immediately. They make it their objective to make sure that the Republicans do not benefit from winning. They do everything to screw up a Republican win, to deny it, to fight it, and the Republicans do not. When the Republicans lose an election, they chalk it up to a loss. They assume the American people rejected them. They assume the American people want whatever the Democrat president’s going to do and they stand by, stand aside and let it happen.

……The Supreme Court saved the Republicans because here was a chance, think about this, Obamacare could have been ended effectively yesterday. Had there been a correct decision, had there been a constitutional decision on that case, Obamacare would have been perhaps dealt its death blow, and the Republican Party did not want that. Because that would have meant the Republican Party had to come up with a plan. And the plan would have had to have included subsidies because Obamacare has been implemented long enough now that people are expecting them.

The GOP had several alternative plans to the ObamaCare disaster in 2009. The Dem majority discarded all of them and proceeded to ram ObamaCare through the Congress.  Not one of those plans, which are feasible by the way, has been resurrected as a replacement for the ObamaCare disaster.

……Republicans should want Obama to lose. And why? Because Obama is doing terrible damage to this country. He is literally inflicting damage on this country with his economic policies, with his health care policies, with his immigration policies, with his spending. Everything Obama is doing is wreaking havoc on this country! Put simply, Obama is doing terrible damage — by helping Iran obtain nuclear weapons, by refusing to enforce immigration laws, by releasing thousands of illegal immigrant felons into our communities, by failing to protect our cyber networks.

Of course, none of that sinks in with the GOP, which seems content to let Obama run roughshod over the country.  For his part, Obama blames America, Congress, and white men  for his own corruption and epic fails.

Unless or until the American public gets pissed off enough to do something about all this, the decline of America will continue until we hit rock bottom.


Related post:



Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 536 other followers