A WaPo Hack’s Wet Dream of a “Gun-Free” Society

From Dana Loesch:

Washington Post writer pines for make-believe society wherein evil doesn’t exist, people don’t need to defend themselves, and the Bill of Rights are just malleable suggestions.

Excerpted with commentary:

“Maybe it’s time to start using the words that the NRA has turned into unmentionables.


Mass buyback.

A gun-free society.

Let’s say that one again: A gun-free society.”

Doesn’t it sound logical? Doesn’t it sound safe? Wouldn’t it make sense to learn from other developed nations, which believe that only the military and law enforcers, when necessary, should be armed — and which as a result lose far, far fewer innocent people than die every year in the United States?”

I know, because there are no

mass shootings

anywhere in Europe (or elsewhere)


because they

banned guns .


“Yes, even saying these words makes the NRA happy. It fuels the slippery-slope argument the gun lobby uses to oppose even the most modest, common-sense reforms. You see? Background checks today, confiscation tomorrow.”

Oregon had background checks and “modest common-sense reforms.”

“And yes, I understand how difficult it would be. This is a matter of changing the culture and norms of an entire society. It would take time.”

Actually, just changing the Bill of Rights. Why stop there? The killer cited reckless media coverage for making previous murderers famous; maybe it’s time we have a national conversation about common sense solutions to regulate media.

“But the incremental approach is not succeeding. It sets increasingly modest goals, increasingly polite goals: close a loophole here, restrict a particularly lethal weapon there. Talk about gun safety and public health. Say “reform,” not “control.”

The author says the incremental approach to undoing the Bill of Rights isn’t working, they need to go whole hog. Close a non-existent loophole here, restrict whatever weapon is black, has stuff on it, and looks shooty. Tell people that control is “reform.” Punish the law-abiding for the deeds of the criminals.

“Every time there is a mass shooting, gun-control advocates argue again for legislation. But almost every time, opponents can argue that this shooter wouldn’t have been blocked from buying a gun, or that this gun would not have been on anyone’s banned list — and so why waste time (and political capital) on irrelevant restrictions?”

FBI Director James Comey issued a public statement admitting the state and FBI “flawed” in not flagging murderer Dylann Roof. Yes, let’s restrict the rights of law-abiding Americans for not only the deeds of criminals, but also because the background check people want expanded is horrifically flawed. Heaven forbid we spend time otherwise making sure that the people administering the law do so and that it’s followed to full extent.

“Modest restrictions can help and have helped. The one-gun-a-month law can reduce crime.”

Based on … ? Doesn’t seem to be working for Chicago, DC, Philly, NYC, etc. Maybe they’re anomalies.

“The gun-show loophole should be closed, and closing it would prevent some criminals from obtaining weapons.”

What “loophole?” If you are classified by the ATF as a dealer you must have a federal firearms license. Background checks are mandatory. You can’t order a gun off of the Internet and have it shipped to your home; it must go through an FFL. No FFL is going to jeopardize their hard-won license for a criminal sale. You may not purchase a firearm from across state lines as dealers are barred via the Gun Control Act of 1968 from selling or transferring firearms sans FLL across state lines.

You may purchase a firearm from an occasional seller, not a dealer (differences matter) in your state of residence if you are legally allowed to own a firearm (no domestic violence record, no felonies, no drug use, et al.) — meaning you are not a prohibited possessor or even suspected of being a prohibited possessor. If you are a prohibited possessor and you buy a gun regardless you’re breaking the law and will be charged with a crime. If a person knowingly sells a prohibited possessor a firearm they are breaking the law and will be charged with a crime. If they claim cluelessness they still may be charged depending on the results of the investigation. That’s not a loophole, that’s a criminal act.

Fred Hiatt—the author of the piece—is full of crap, but then he’s a WaPo hack. “Civilized countries” (since Hiatt doesn’t view us in that category) have fared pretty fucking poorly with their “gun-free” policies.

So have cities like D.C., Chicago, and New York, which have banned guns entirely, except for law enforcement, which should presumably be like English Bobbies with no need for weapons that fire projectiles at gun-wielding bad guys, since citizens aren’t supposed to have guns.

When some deranged wackjob walks right past the “gun-free zone” sign prominently posted outside a school and opens fire on students,  it doesn’t stop the gun control idiots from blaming the firearms instead of the nutbag who wielded them.

Screaming for “gun control” plays well with the leftwingnuts, who wet themselves just talking about guns.

Bottom line: Armed criminals deliberately choose soft, unarmed targets. They couldn’t give one shit less about the idea of restrictive gun laws.  Every law-abiding American citizen has the right to defend themselves from low life thugs and deranged psychos in spite of the Left’s fatuous politicizing.

We need a libtard-free society.

Anyone who thinks “gun free” societies exist or will ever exist has a shit factory for a brain. Criminals will always find ways to get them. Governments who rule over disarmed populations are prone to tyranny.
I am a retired Army Sergeant First Class. I own a firearm. I’m an NRA member. And I support the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment ensures the protection of the First.

Criminals and dictators prefer unarmed citizens.

Screw you, Hiatt.

Molon Labe.


Related posts:










Related article:


Anti-Christian ‘Mixed-Race’ Nutjob Walks into ‘Gun Free’ Zone at Oregon College, Kills Christians

“Gun control laws control the behavior of legitimate people…[but] people who are insane…don’t follow”

Rudy Giuliani, former NYC mayor


“A bi-racial guy who sympathized with Vester Flanagan and killed people

for being Christians? How do we spin THIS one?”


Initial report from Fox News:

The gunman who killed nine people and injured seven at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg, Ore. Thursday before being killed by police has been identified as Chris Harper Mercer, two law enforcement sources confirmed to Fox News.

No background on Mercer – or details about any possible motive – were released. However, Fox was told that as a precaution, counterterrorism officials were running his name against watchlists and checking his e-mail history, phone logs, social media profiles and online history to rule out any links to terrorism.

Douglas County Sheriff John Hanlin said that as of Thursday night, “we are reporting 10 fatalities in the shooting (and) seven injuries” who were transported to a local hospital and to a hospital in Eugene. Mercer was included in the death count.

……Kortney Moore, 18, told the News-Review she was in her Writing 115 class in Snyder Hall when a shot came through the window. Moore said she saw her teacher get shot in the head. The shooter then reportedly told the students to get on the ground before asking people to stand up and state their religion. He then began firing. Moore said she was lying on the ground with people who had been shot.

……Hanlin said officers located the shooters upon arriving at the college.

“They located the shooter in one of the buildings,” he said. “Officers engaged that suspect. There was an exchange of gunfire. The shooter threat was neutralized.”

Well, that’s one small consolation. The little shitbag is dead.


From Fox News.

The gunman in Thursday’s mass shooting at an Oregon community college specifically targeted Christians, three witnesses said, while online accounts linked to the shooter expressed disdain for organized religion.

Authorities say Christopher Harper Mercer killed at least nine people and wounded at least seven others at Umpqua Community College in Roseburg before he was killed in an exchange of gunfire with police.

Investigators have shed very little light publicly on Mercer’s possible motive for the shooting. However, reports indicated they were examining Mercer’s online presence very closely….. Another official said investigators were poring over what he described as “hateful”writings by Mercer. Oregon’s top federal prosecutor told The Oregonian newspaper that authorities had heard rumors that the gunman had issued “some sort of race-related manifesto” before the shooting.

Kortney Moore, 18, told the Roseburg News-Review that she was in a Writing 115 class when one shot came through the window. Moore said she saw her teacher get shot in the head. The shooter then reportedly told the students to get on the ground before asking people to stand up and state their religion. He then began firing. Moore said she was lying on the ground with people who had been shot.

The mutherfucker idolized Vester Flanagan (Bryce Williams) who shot to death two white co-workers:

From Scallywag and Vagabond:

A blog post penned by UCC Shooter Chris Harper Mercer reveals the Umpqua Community College gunman praising former WDBJ reporter Vester Lee Flanagan who gunned down two former colleagues live on television.

Wrote Mercer in part on a blog post August 30th under the user name, Lithium_Love linked to email address, ironcross45@gmail.com: People like him have nothing to live for.’

From his online dating profile:

mercer oregon college shooter

mercer oregon college shooter 2

He called himself “conservative republican” but targeted Christians after writing a racist manifesto. Not very conservative, or Republican. Actually, he was a registered Independent. He also hated religion, but shot only Christians. There were no muzzies in the classroom.

His father is white, his mother, Laurel Harper, is black.

And of course, Barky’s politicization was instantaneous:

“I’d ask the American people to think about how they can get our govt to change these laws & to save lives.”

Why don’t you find a way to stop nutjobs from targeting people in “gun free zones”? Jackass.

This is coming from the same asshole who participated in Holder’s Fast and Furious” gunrunning to Mexico.

An Army veteran was shot five times trying to stop Mercer:

Army vet Chris Mintz charged oregon college shooter

Mashable has additional information

Under the username Ironcross45, Harper-Mercer also had an active dating profile on the website Spiritual Passions, in which he says he is spiritual but not into organized religion. Despite this, one of the two people he has as connections on MySpace is a man with extremist Islamic views.

Heavy.com has a collection of Mercer’s ramblings and behavior on social media.

Basically, he was a deranged sack of shit and now he’s taking a dirt nap.

Related articles:




Benjamin Netanyahu Blasts Iran and the UN in Speech to UN General Assembly

Today, the leader of America’s only real ally in the Middle East, stood before the U.N. assembly and let them have it with both barrels, for not preventing Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.

The full transcript, HERE.


……after three days of listening to world leaders praise the nuclear deal with Iran, I begin my speech today by saying: Ladies and Gentlemen, check your enthusiasm at the door.

You see, this deal doesn’t make peace more likely.

By fueling Iran’s aggressions with billions of dollars in sanctions relief, it makes war more likely.

Just look at what Iran has done in the last six months alone, since the framework agreement was announced in Lausanne.

Iran boosted its supply of devastating weapons to Syria.

Iran sent more soldiers of its Revolutionary Guard into Syria. Iran sent thousands of Afghani and Pakistani Shi’ite fighters to Syria.

Iran did all this to prop up Assad’s brutal regime.

Iran also shipped tons of weapons and ammunition to the Houthi rebels in Yemen, including another shipment just two days ago.

……Iran’s proxy Hezbollah smuggled into Lebanon SA-22 missiles to down our planes, and Yakhont cruise missiles to sink our ships.

Iran supplied Hezbollah with precision-guided surface-to-surface missiles and attack drones so it can accurately hit any target in Israel.

Iran aided Hamas and Islamic Jihad in building armed drones in Gaza.

Iran also made clear its plans to open two new terror fronts against Israel, promising to arm Palestinians in the West Bank and sending its Revolutionary Guard generals to the Golan Heights, from which its operatives recently fired rockets on northern Israel.

Israel will continue to respond forcefully to any attacks against it from Syria.

Israel will continue to act to prevent the transfer of strategic weapons to Hezbollah from and through Syrian territory.

……Iran’s been doing all of this, everything that I’ve just described,  just in the last six months, when it was trying to convince the world to remove the sanctions.

Now just imagine what Iran will do after those sanctions are lifted.

Unleashed and un-muzzled, Iran will go on the prowl, devouring more and more prey.

In the wake of the nuclear deal, Iran is spending billions of dollars on weapons and satellites.

You think Iran is doing that to advance peace?

You think hundreds of billions of dollars in sanctions relief and fat contracts will turn this
rapacious tiger into a kitten?

……And what makes matters even worse is that we see a world celebrating this bad deal, rushing to embrace and do business with a regime openly committed to our destruction.

Last week, Major General Salehi, the commander of Iran’s army, proclaimed this:

“We will annihilate Israel for sure.”

“We are glad that we are in the forefront of executing the Supreme Leader’s order to destroy Israel.”

And as for the Supreme Leader himself, a few days after the nuclear deal was announced, he released his latest book.

Here it is.

It’s a 400-page screed detailing his plan to destroy the State of Israel.

Last month, Khamenei once again made his genocidal intentions clear before Iran’s top clerical body, the Assembly of Experts.

He spoke about Israel, home to over six million Jews. He pledged, “there will be no Israel in 25 years.”

Seventy years after the murder of six million Jews, Iran’s rulers promise to destroy my country.

Murder my people.

And the response from this body, the response from nearly every one of the governments represented here has been absolutely nothing!

Utter silence!

Deafening silence.

The best moment came next, when Netanyahu glareed at the U.N. for 45 seconds after berating its silence on Iran’s threat to Israel.

……But don’t think that Iran is only a danger to Israel.

Besides Iran’s aggression in the Middle East and its terror around the world, Iran is also building intercontinental ballistic missiles whose sole purpose is to carry nuclear warheads.

Now remember this: Iran already has missiles that can reach Israel.

So those intercontinental ballistic missiles that Iran is building – they’re not meant for us –

They’re meant for you.

For Europe.

For America.

For raining down mass destruction – anytime, anywhere.

……And today, as a rising tide of anti-Semitism once again sweeps across Europe and elsewhere, many Jews come to Israel to join us in building the Jewish future.

So here’s my message to the rulers of Iran:

Your plan to destroy Israel will fail.

Israel will not permit any force on earth to threaten its future.

And here’s my message to all the countries represented here:

Whatever resolutions you may adopt in this building, whatever decisions you may take in your capitals, Israel will do whatever it must do to defend our state and to defend our people.

……The UN won’t help peace, certainly won’t help advance peace by trying to impose solutions or by encouraging Palestinian rejectionism.

And the UN, distinguished delegates, should do one more thing. The UN should finally rid itself of the obsessive bashing of Israel.

Here’s just one absurd example of this obsession:

In four years of horrific violence in Syria, more than a quarter of a million people have lost their lives.

That’s more than ten times, more than ten times, the number of Israelis and Palestinians combined who have lost their lives in a century of conflict between us.

Yet last year, this Assembly adopted 20 resolutions against Israel and just one resolution about the savage slaughter in Syria.

Talk about injustice. Talk about disproportionality. Twenty.  Count them. One against Syria.

Well, frankly I am not surprised.

Barky’s nuke deal essentially gave Iran the green light to make a nuke as soon as they can.  He kisses the asses of our enemies, and disrespects the only ally we have in the Middle East. As long as Obama’s in the White House, Israel will have to fend for itself.

Related Article:


50th Anniversary of the Ted Kennedy Bill That Led to the Illegal Alien Crisis

From The Conservative Review.

This week marks the 50th anniversary of the 1965 “Hart-Cellar” immigration act, commonly referred to as “the Kennedy Immigration bill.”  At the time, the bill was sold as a modest increase in immigration from the four decades of low immigration and some blatantly discriminatory policies.  Americans were ensured that the bill would not fundamentally alter the character – political, social, or fiscal – of this country.  At the time, Rep. Patsy T. Mink (D-HI) estimated, on average, less than 200,000 immigrants would be admitted per year and predicted that 82% would come from Europe.  Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach predicted the bill would induce a net increase of about 60,000 immigrants per year. [See CIS for more fascinating quotes and promises from political leaders at the time.]

A half century later, this bill turned out to be the most consequential piece of legislation in modern times and has irrevocably transformed America.  Moreover, according to a new comprehensive analysis of immigration trends from Pew Hispanic, we have not even witnessed the peak from this unprecedented wave of immigration.

This blockbuster Pew report exposes trends in immigration that are not only antithetical to anything our Founders envisioned as it relates to immigration, but run contrary to a number of promises given by supporters of the 1965 immigration bill.  As you read these statistics, keep in mind that nobody ever voted for this transformation in a transparent manner.  Also remember, that these numbers are the reality under current law and the existing trajectory – the very system the majority of the political class deems too restrictive.

We don’t need a Pew report to show us the devastating result of unchecked “immigration”.

The Dems want to add as many of these dredges to their voting bloc as they can, which is why they push so hard for open borders and amnesty.

Related article:


Salon Touts Pedophile Who Insists He’s Not a ‘Monster’

Suddenly the idea that “gay rights” lead to pedophilia “rights” isn’t so crazy anymore.

Todd Nickerson, a self-admitted, depraved, perverted pedophile, wrote an article for leftwing rag Salon, in which he tries to elicit sympathy for his ‘plight’.

Excerpts from Nickerson’s sickening article:

“I was born without my right hand. As a child, this deformity quickly set me apart from my peers. In public I wore a prosthesis, an intimidating object to other youngsters because of its resemblance to a pirate’s hook.  Even so, I wore it every day; I felt inadequate without it. I was shy, uncoordinated and terrible at sports, all of which put me on the outs with other boys my age. But I was good at drawing and making up stories for my own entertainment, and I spent more and more time in my own head, being a space adventurer or monster wrangler or whatever character I could think up. These would ultimately prove to be useful skills, but for now they only served to further alienate me from other kids.  On top of it all, I still struggled with bladder control—likely due to my heaping pile of insecurities, to which this problem only added more—well into my elementary school years.  

But none of this would compare to the final insult the universe would deal me.  I’ve been stuck with the most unfortunate of sexual orientations, a preference for a group of people who are legally, morally and psychologically unable to reciprocate my feelings and desires.  It’s a curse of the first order, a completely unworkable sexuality, and it’s mine.  Who am I?  Nice to meet you.  My name is Todd Nickerson, and I’m a pedophile.  Does that surprise you?  Yeah, not many of us are willing to share our story, for good reason.  To confess a sexual attraction to children is to lay claim to the most reviled status on the planet, one that effectively ends any chance you have of living a normal life.  Yet, I’m not the monster you think me to be.  I’ve never touched a child sexually in my life and never will, nor do I use child pornography.”

Blaming your sick sexual orientation on a birth defect, shyness, urinary incontinence, and the universe, just makes this whole thing that much more grotesque.  Nickerson claims to have never realized his fantasies by actually molesting kids or reading child porn, but I’m betting that’s a load of bullshit.

His response to the outrage, from Breitbart.

Todd Nickerson at Salon.com follows up his essay on pedophile sympathy by attacking his critics–singling out Breitbart News’ John Sexton, who, along with Milo Yiannopoulos, undermined Nickerson’s claim of being a “virtuous” person trapped within a sexual orientation inexorably linked to an unbearable social stigma.”:

“……My article “I’m A Pedophile, But Not a Monster” was published last week and it has been a whirlwind since.”

……”While there has been a visible backlash, predominantly from the political right, in private it has been a different story. This piece has generated debate and controversy all over the world, well beyond my wildest imaginings. When I first approached Salon with the idea, my editor was receptive, but throughout the process of refining the piece, she asked me if I really understood what I was getting into. Her concern was palpable. I assured her I did, which was mostly true; I had no idea it would blow up as quickly as it did, and the bigger it got, the more of a tempest it became. Even so, I have no regrets. I knew when I wrote it that it was going to be an important piece, something unique and necessary. And so it was.”

……”First off, Sexton attacks me for not narking out the people at the pro-contacter forum who were supposedly doing illegal things. This is purely a straw man attack, since I never observed anyone there doing anything illegal or admitting to illegal activity (which is actually forbidden by that forum’s rules). Before I respond, I want to say that I considered naming the forum here. I didn’t want to, but since I’m being forced to defend myself on the grounds that I haven’t reallybeen vigilant about my anti-contact position, with the implication that I was likely involved in immoral activities myself, I almost felt I had no choice. But ultimately, I decided it was worth weathering the accusations not to give that forum the publicity they so desperately seek. At the risk of embarrassing myself for some stupid things in the past, you can seek out my old Wikisposure page if you like; it’s still out there, doing its mischief, so it’s not hard to find the name of that site if you are truly interested.”

“The point is, the site is not in the darknet. It has been operating openly for years.”

Nickerson, himself a pedophile, participates on a forum which connects pedophiles with each other, but it’s okay because he “never observed anyone there doing anything illegal or admitting to illegal activity”, because it’s forbidden by the forum’s rules.

After the shit hit the fan, he played the victim card and blamed the “right-wing hate machine” for the public revulsion toward his pederasty.  If you view pedophilia for the warped, deviant, sick , deranged lifestyle it is, then something’s wrong with you.

Apparently, leftwingnuts are just fine with it.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 588 other followers