Don’t Separate Illegal Alien Families at the Border, Send Them All Back Home Together

Bubba Clinton signed a law in 1996 that separated children from adults illegally entering America. Liberals were silent. Matter of fact, when Bubba’s minion Janet Reno did this, liberals supported it:

Elian Gonzalez was a young Cuban refugee whose mother—a legitimate asylum seeker— had drowned trying to get her son to freedom in America.  He was with relatives in Miami who refused to return the child to his father, who wanted to take him back to Cuba.  The Miami Cuban expatriate community rallied to keep the boy in the United States.  A federal judge ordered they return the boy to his father.  Reno flew to Florida to intimidate the relatives.  The Miami family members ignored Reno’s deadline for them to comply with the judge’s order, so she authorized jackboots to enter their home and seize the 6-year-old.

Obama enforced this same immigration law (albeit very sparsely) throughout his entire regime. Liberals said nothing. Donald Trump is enforcing the law. Liberals go ballistic.

When the left says “don’t separate kids at the border” they are really saying it’s 100% fine to break the law if they bring their kids.

These kids are literally being dumped, by their parents, across the border, and many of them are being dumped by ‘coyotes’  and people who pose as family members.  Send them back across and tell the south-of-the-border beaners that we are not going to allow illegals into the country regardless of age, nor will we allow them to use the “children” for exploitation of their agenda.

Real asylum seekers are not the primary motivation for the Left’s push for total amnesty.  It’s part of their effort to create more dependents on the Dem plantation and add these foreign nationals to their voting bloc.


Related articles:


*Shocker*: FBI Knew Hillary Lied but Let Her Off the Hook Anyway

Via Western Journal


The FBI officials who interviewed Hillary Clinton about her use of a private email server found some of her claims “hard to impossible to believe,” according to the Department of Justice’s inspector general’s report.

Clinton repeatedly claimed ignorance when pressed by FBI agents in a July 2016 interview about receiving multiple emails with a “(C)” classification marker, according to the IG’s report on the FBI’s investigation of Clinton’s private server.

She said she did not know that the marker denoted classified information and “speculated it was a reference to paragraphs ranked in alphabetical order.”

The unidentified agent who took the lead in questioning Clinton about her private server stated, “I filed that in the bucket of hard to impossible to believe.”

……“I can’t sit here and tell you I believed her,” Comey said, according to the report.

“I can only tell you, in no particular could we prove that she was being untruthful to us.”

Comey said the plan going into the interview was that if Clinton “lied to us in a way we thought we could prove, that would have changed everything.”

But despite the fact that the FBI and DOJ officials who attended the interview found Clinton’s claim to technological ignorance “strained credulity,” the interviewers said her statement could not be “affirmatively disproved.”

……“My god … I’m actually starting to have embarrassment sprinkled on my disappointment … Ever been forced to do something you adamantly opposed,” the agent said in another message.

The agent later told the DOJ inspector general he did not know what he meant by “forced to do something you adamantly opposed.”

Four days after interviewing Clinton, the agent sent an instant message saying he was “done interviewing the President,” in reference to Clinton.


Hillary deliberately used an illegal, unsecure server to store and transmit classified information, tampered with evidence, deleted incriminating emails, and lied before Congress. It’s right in front of everyone’s face.  She knew that it was a national security violation, but did it anyway.

But Comey thinks “in no particular could we prove that she was being untruthful”.  The evidence slapped him right in the face, but he chose to ignore it. Political bias does that.

Obama Took Lying to New Heights With the Iran Nuke Deal

Anyone who fell for Obama’s spiel has a shit factory for a brain.

Via Marc A. Thiessen at WaPo

When it comes to the Iran nuclear deal, the Obama administration increasingly appears to have been a bottomless pit of deception.

First, Barack Obama failed to disclose to Congress the existence of secret side deals on inspections when he transmitted the nuclear accord to Capitol Hill. (They were only uncovered by chance when then-Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-Kan.) and Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) learned about them during a meeting with International Atomic Energy Agency officials in Vienna.) Then, we learned that the Obama administration had secretly sent a plane to Tehran loaded with $400 million in Swiss francs, euros and other currencies on the same day Iran released four American hostages, which was followed by two more secret flights carrying another $1.3 billion in cash.

Now, in a bombshell revelation, Republicans on the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, led by Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio), have revealed in a new report that the Obama administration secretly tried to help Iran use U.S. banks to convert $5.7 billion in Iranian assets, after promising Congress that Iran would not get access to the U.S. financial system — and then lied to Congress about what it had done. (Full disclosure: My wife works for Portman).

In July 2015, Obama Treasury Secretary Jack Lew assured the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that, under the nuclear accord, Iran “will continue to be denied access to the [U.S.] financial and commercial market” and that “Iranian banks will not be able to clear U.S. dollars through New York, hold correspondent account relationships with U.S. financial institutions, or enter into financing arrangements with U.S. banks.” A few weeks later, one of Lew’s top deputies, Adam Szubin, used the exact same words in testimony to the Senate banking committee.
But Senate investigators found that on Feb. 24, 2016, the Obama Treasury Department “granted a specific license that authorized a conversion of Iranian assets worth billions of U.S. dollars using the U.S. financial system” — exactly what Lew and Szubin said would not happen — including unlimited future Iranian deposits at Bank Muscat in Oman until the license expired.

Not only that, Senate investigators found that officials from the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which regulates U.S. banks’ compliance with U.S. sanctions law, “encouraged two U.S. correspondent banks to convert the funds.” The report says “both banks declined to complete the transaction due to compliance, reputational, and legal risks associated with doing business with Iran.”

Then, after issuing the license, the Obama administration explicitly denied to Congress that it had done so. Lew and Szubin both failed to disclose the license in congressional testimony while continuing to assert that the Obama administration would not give Iran access to U.S. financial institutions — when they had just tried to do so. And in a June 2016 letter to Sens. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) and Mark Kirk (R-Ill.), Treasury officials declared “The U.S. Department of Treasury is not working on behalf of Iran to enable Iranian access to U.S. dollars elsewhere in the international financial system, nor are we assisting Iran in gaining access to dollar payment systems outside the U.S. financial system. The Administration has not been and is not planning to grant Iran access to the U.S. financial system.” This was patently false.

Investigators also found internal State Department emails, in which officials admitted that the Obama administration had “exceeded our JCPOA commitments” by authorizing Iranian access to U.S. banks. Furthermore, the report reveals that the Obama administration put on more than 200 “roadshows” across the world where they encouraged foreign financial institutions to do business with Iran “as long as the rest of the world left the United States out of it.” According to the report, during a roadshow in London, OFAC Director John Smith “downplayed the likelihood of any future penalties or fines,” telling the audience “that 95% of the time OFAC sees an apparent violation it results in a simple warning letter or no enforcement action.”

In other words, the Obama administration: (1) told Congress it would not allow Iran access to U.S. financial institutions; (2) issued a special license allowing Iran to do exactly that; (3) unsuccessfully pressured U.S. banks to help Iran; (4) lied to Congress and the American people about what it had done; (5) admitted in internal emails that these efforts “exceeded” U.S. obligations under the nuclear deal; (6) sent officials, including bank regulators, around the world to urge foreign financial institutions to do business with Iran; and (7) promised that they would get nothing more than a slap on the wrist for violating U.S. sanctions.



The criminality of Obama’s Iran nuke deal involved giving payoffs to Iranian bankspaying $400 million in ransom to the Iranian thugs for hostages, and essentially  giving them the green light to make bombs.

Iran not only continued its nuke development , but used the aid from Obama as an added benefit.

Reaffirmed: Obama Knew About Hillary’s Illegal Email Server


In January, the National Review carried this story:

……the whitewash of the Hillary Clinton–emails caper was Barack Obama’s call — not the FBI’s, and not the Justice Department’s. (See, e.g., herehere, and here.) The decision was inevitable. Obama, using a pseudonymous email account, had repeatedly communicated with Secretary Clinton over her private, non-secure email account.

These emails must have involved some classified information, given the nature of consultations between presidents and secretaries of state, the broad outlines of Obama’s own executive order defining classified intelligence (see EO 13526, section 1.4), and the fact that the Obama administration adamantly refused to disclose the Clinton–Obama emails. If classified information was mishandled, it was necessarily mishandled on both ends of these email exchanges.

If Clinton had been charged, Obama’s culpable involvement would have been patent. In any prosecution of Clinton, the Clinton–Obama emails would have been in the spotlight. For the prosecution, they would be more proof of willful (or, if you prefer, grossly negligent) mishandling of intelligence. More significantly, for Clinton’s defense, they would show that Obama was complicit in Clinton’s conduct yet faced no criminal charges.


Well, the IG Report on Clinton’s email server just reiterated the facts.

From Fox News

Obama was one of a select handful of individuals who had “direct contact” with Hillary Clinton on her private email account, Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz indicated in his bombshell report Thursday on the Clinton email probe.

In a footnote, the DOJ watchdog notes that “FBI analysts and Prosecutor 2 told us that former President Barack Obama was one of the 13 individuals with whom Clinton had direct contact using her account.”

The IG report adds that Obama used a pseudonym for his username and that, after intelligence analysts questioned whether Obama’s communications contained classified information, it was determined the emails sent and received were not classified.

Obama said in a 2015 interview to CBS News that he learned about it “the same time everybody else learned it, through news reports.”

……Elsewhere in the IG report, the IG asked investigators why they made no effort to obtain the personal devices that Clinton’s senior aides were using at the State Department, since those devices were “potential sources of Clinton’s … classified emails” or places where unauthorized classified emails were being stored.

In response, officials on the probe claimed that “the culture of mishandling classified information at the State Department” was so pervasive that it “made the quantity of potential sources of evidence particularly vast” — a rationale that the IG implied was unconvincing, because investigators could simply have obtained personal devices for a handful of key Clinton aides.


FBI texts showed the cover-up of Obama’s direct knowledge of her illegal email server.

Barky used a pseudonym in his emails to Hillary on her illegal server.  I would love to know what fake name he used. “Chocolate Jesus”? “The Metrosexual-in-Chief”? “The Bear”? (That’s an actual nickname he made for himself)

He knew about her unsecure email and engaged in correspondence. And he lied about it. No wonder she didn’t get prosecuted.




Related posts:

IG Report Contains a Multitude of Anti-Trump and Anti-Trump Voter Rants From FBI Agents, Mueller Attorneys

The raging moonbats vented their political spleens during the election and a bogus investigation against Donald Trump, but according to Michael Horowitz, that had no bearing on the reasons why Hillary skated on her crimes.

Remember, these are the same FBI agents and Mueller attorneys involved in the investigation.

Via Fox News

……But while many of those texts were made public in late 2017, the IG report revealed a new one in which Strzok vowed to “stop” Trump from becoming president — and made clear that as many as five total FBI employees exchanged politically charged messages. “The text messages and instant messages sent by these employees included statements of hostility toward then candidate Trump and statements of support for candidate Clinton,” the report said.

The report revealed instant messages between unnamed agents, labeled “Agent 1” and “Agent 5,” discussing their jobs in August 2016.

“I find anyone who enjoys [this job] an absolute f—ing idiot. If you don’t think so, ask them one more question. Who are you voting for? I guarantee you it will be Donald Drumpf,” Agent 1 sent.

“I forgot about drumpf…that’s so sad and pathetic if they want to vote for him,” Agent 5 responded. “Someone who can’t answer a question. Someone who can’t be professional for even a second.”

In September, Agent 1 and 5 conversed again, bashing Trump supporters as “retarded.”

“I’m trying to think of a ‘would I rather’ instead of spending time with those people,” Agent 5 sent.

Agent 1 asked, “stick your tongue in a fan??”

Agent 5 later wrote: “I would rather have brunch with trump and a bunch of his supporters like the ones from ohio that are retarded.”

I’m a veteran and Trump supporter from Ohio. I would love to meet “Agent 5” face to face.

More from the Western Journal:

……Shortly after the FBI announced they were reopening the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email on Oct. 28, 2016, Attorney 2 sent out several messages which seemed to reference the event. “I mean, I never really liked the Republic anyway,” one read. “As I have initiated the destruction of the republic … Would you be so kind as to have a coffee with me this afternoon?” read another. “I’m clinging to small pockets of happiness in the dark time of the Republic’s destruction,” another said.

According to the report, Attorney 2 brushed those off by having “described these messages as reflecting his surprise and frustration that the FBI ‘was essentially walking into a landmine in terms of injecting itself (into the election) at that late in the process.’”

……The conversation has mostly to do with the FBI’s role in the election, if any. Note the tone, where the attorney seems to believe that they ought to be acting as a partisan arm of the Democrats.

……“The third exchange we identified was on November 22, 2016,” the IG report read. “FBI Attorney 2 sent an instant message to FBI Attorney 1 commenting on the amount of money the subject of an FBI investigation had been paid while working on the Trump campaign. FBI Attorney 1 responded, ‘Is it making you rethink your commitment to the Trump administration?’ FBI Attorney 2 replied, ‘Hell no.’ and then added, ‘Viva le resistance.’”

And so they continued, a vaunted member of La Résistance Nouvelle until the moment Robert Mueller saw those messages and was given an Insta-migraine. The special counsel’s office issued a statement saying that “FBI Attorney 2 did not work for the Special Counsel’s Office as a prosecutor or as an investigator,” although little other info was given.

The political bias of the DOJ and FBI was the entire motivation behind the effort to block criminal charges against Hillary and undermine the election of Donald Trump.



Either Horowitz is the dumbest fuck on the planet or he’s too scared to admit the evidence.  I’m guessing door number 1.