Petty Backstabbing: Obama Declassifies Information Detailing Israel’s Nuclear Program

This is what Obama does to those who stand up to his belligerence.

From The Weekly Standard.

On February 12, the Pentagon quietly declassified a top-secret 386-page Department of Defense document from 1987 detailing Israel’s nuclear program – the first time Israel’s alleged nuclear program has ever been officially and publically referenced by the U.S. authorities.

In the declassified document, the Pentagon reveals supposed details about Israel’s deterrence capabilities, but it kept sections on France, Germany, and Italy classified. Those sections are blacked out in the document.

The two main exceptions in the international media that wrote about the declassification at the time were the state-funded Iranian regime station Press TV and the state-funded Russian station RT.

Both these media were rumored to have been tipped off about this obscure report at the time by persons in Washington. (Both the RT and PressTV stories falsely claim that the U.S. gave Israel help in building a hydrogen bomb. This is incorrect.)

Israel has never admitted to having nuclear weapons. To do so might spark a regional nuclear arms race, and eventual nuclear confrontation.

Hell,  hostile Arab countries have developed and produced nuclear weapons for decades. They’re not exactly using their centrifuges and nuke material for peaceful goals. Can’t blame Israel for doing what it has to do to protect itself and deter threats. Obama damned sure won’t.

The declassification is a serious breach of decades’ old understandings concerning this issue between Israel and its north American and certain European allies.

Obama has pretty much trashed any understanding between us and our allies.

The Pentagon’s February declassification coincided with intense pressure on the Netanyahu government by the Obama administration, trying to force the Israeli prime minister to cancel a planned speech to Congress questioning the wisdom of a highly risky nuclear deal with the Iranian regime.

Benjamin Netanyahu won’t kiss Barky’s ass, nor will he sacrifice the security of Israel to please Obama’s propensity to kiss Iran’s ass.  Netanyahu made a good decision accepting the GOP’s offer to speak before Congress.  It was the only way he could directly voice his concerns to America about Obama’s maltreatment of Israel and the consequences of a nuclear Iran, which really got Barky’s panties in a wad.

……This coincides with stepped up efforts this week by the Obama administration to weaken Israel’s deterrent capabilities, including leaking to the Wall Street Journal incorrect allegations that Israel directly spies on the U.S.

An informed person connected to the government in Jerusalem, tells me:

“Over the years there have been backhanded references and comments made by individuals with some familiarity with this issue. But there has never before been any official description of the quality and capacity of installations. This kind of declassified document constitutes a whole different level of acknowledgement. It is part of a pattern of carefully controlled leaking of information which is very hard to attribute to a specific government agency or individual. Nevertheless it is clear what is happening.

“The failure to maintain the degree of mature and cooperative discretion that officials from several governments have exercised up to now, marks a serious change in the code of conduct. It is not wise to draw attention to this issue because it would tend to destabilize the international order and encourage others to pursue nuclear capabilities.”

You forget, Obama is a petty little tyrant who thinks of himself as an unassailable emperor who’s entitled to anything he wants, especially deference from allies who have the gall to counter his subversion.

And to top it off, Barky is considering allowing Iran to operate centrifuges in underground bunkers.

Obama’s betrayal of Israel shouldn’t surprise anyone.  He always treats his perceived enemies that way.

 

Related article:

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-iran-can-be-very-successful-regional-power_822522.html

Idiot Parents Let Kids Use Vietnam Women’s Memorial as Jungle Gym

Nothing like teaching your children disrespect for veterans at a young age.

Those parents should be slapped.

From The Army Times.

A photo taken of two young girls playing on the Vietnam Women’s Memorial has sparked outrage online, particularly among veterans.

The picture appeared on Reddit and then a Fox News affiliate picked up the story.

brats climbing on vietnam women's memorial

The photo also shows an elderly man who came to visit the memorial. He can be seen in a wheelchair wearing a “USS Emmons” ball cap. The Emmons was destroyed by kamikaze pilots off Okinawa during WWII. Sixty sailors lost their lives.

The Vietnam memorial was designed as a tribute to women who served in Vietnam, most as nurses. It depicts a nurse helping a wounded soldier. Dedicated in 1993, it sits a couple hundred feet from the Vietnam Memorial on the northwest side of the Lincoln Memorial Reflection Pool in Washington, D.C.

This is the memorial, without the brats:

vietnam women's memorial

The man who snapped the photo, Matthew Munson, told Fox 8 that the children’s parents had encouraged them to climb on the memorial for a picture. Munson said he snapped the picture when he noticed the veterans who showed up. Munson said the vets “looked hurt more than angry” as the kids treated the memorial “like a jungle gym” and their parents laughed. He said the veterans looked past the kids toward the parents.

Many on Reddit have eviscerated the parents. Some stressed the mass casualties in the Vietnam War, and demanded a sense of reverence for those who had lost.

Many also suggested kids could just as easily climb a tree or play at a park.

“This is the Nurses Memorial. I’m an Army Vet and a nurse. Only an asshole would let their kids climb on a memorial like it was a jungle gym,” a commenter wrote.

There were some who actually thought it was cute and equated it with ‘joyful, carefree childhood’ and that veterans fought so that ‘kids can be kids’.

Whoever thinks it was cute, has a shit factory for a brain. There are parks with monkey bars and other things for ‘kids to be kids’. I and my fellow veterans did not fight so that children could use a veteran’s memorial for a damned playground.

What’s next? Rappelling off the WWII memorial?  Hopscotch through the Korean War memorial?

That’s not the proper way to honor the fallen.

 

 

Obama Regime: Trading 5 Muzzie Terrorist Cutthroats for One Deserter/Traitor was ‘Worth It’

They have no fucking shame. When the facts and the truth don’t fit the narrative, keep spinning the narrative.

From Fox News.

The incoming White House communications director defended the decision to trade Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl for five Taliban leaders last year, even as newly announced desertion charges for Bergdahl renewed Republican criticism of the prisoner swap.

“Was it worth it? Absolutely,” Jen Psaki told Megyn Kelly on Fox News’ “The Kelly File.” “We have a commitment to our men and women serving in the military, defending our national security every day, that we’re going to do everything to bring them home if we can, and that’s what we did in this case.”

What you ‘did in this case’ was slap the face of every military member who has served honorably. Fuck you and your pathetic “worth it”. He didn’t defend shit. He abandoned his post, deserted, and literally defected to the enemy.  He also converted to Islam and declared himself a ‘mujahid‘. The little ratfuck should have been left to rot in the Afghan desert with his Taliban pals.

Bergdahl and Taliban pal

After the trade, Obama’s National Security Advisor Susan Rice, declared that Bergdahl’s desertion constituted “serving with honor and distinction”.  Yeah, she’s the same scrunt who appeared on 5 different Sunday talk shows to push Obama’s Benghazi talking points. When Obama needs to trundle out someone to push his insipid bullshit, she always gets the nod.

The military was dead set against releasing any Taliban in exchange for Bergdahl, but again, Obama bypassed them the way he bypasses the law and the Constitution.

The outrage over Obama’s despicable tactic went viral to the point where the Army finally decided to buck Obama and charge Bergdahl with desertion.  There’s no doubt in my military mind that it took this long to bring charges because Obama brought pressure and wanted the whole thing to go down the memory hole.

Army leaders most certainly wanted to pound Bergdahl as soon as they got a hold of him, but  since Bergdahl is a poster boy for Obama’s sympathy for muzzies, the Army brass  drug their feet over a courts martial.

Obama owes the members of Bergdahl’s former platoon an apology for smearing them because they told the truth.

They’ll never get an apology, but they can testify during the Courts Martial and get at least some retribution.  While the prosecution is presenting its case, it should post this in a prominent place in the courtroom:

Soldiers who tried to find Bergdahl

These are the six heroes who sacrificed their lives looking for Bergdahl’s worthless ass.

 

Texas Town Halts Creeping Sharia

Background: A contingent of muzzie shitbags decided to form a “tribunal” in the town of Irving, Texas, to implement Sharia Law as part of  their little enclave.

That didn’t go over too well with the local folks who object to a violent ideology hellbent on creating a new  Caliphate.

Good for them.

From BizPac Review.

Cheers erupted in the city council meeting room in Irving, Texas, last week as the city passed an ordinance to make sure foreign laws would never replace Americans or Texas laws – but the city’s Muslim activists weren’t happy.

That’s because the 5-4 vote supported a proposed state law that was inspired by the establishment of a Muslim tribunal in Irving that supporters say is meant only to help local Muslims use Islamic laws to settle domestic disputes, but critics say is the first step to getting Sharia law implemented in Texas..

“The elephant in the room in that it’s the anti-Sharia bill,” one activist told the local CBS station.

Irving Mayor Beth Van Duyne is an outspoken opponent of the Muslim tribunal and the possibility of Sharia law in the United States, but stressed during Thursday’s council meeting that the ordinance did not mention Sharia by name, or any other religion.

The point, she said, was that American and state civil laws reign supreme – and no foreign law has standing.

“Respect the, obey them, embrace them,” she said.

I would have gone father and said: “If you muzzie zealots want Sharia and Islamofascism, go back to your home countries. If you’re a muzzie convert, join them.  This is the United States of America, not an Islamic satellite .”
Islam is diametrically opposed to every Constitutional principle on which this country was founded. Under the muzzie point of view, Sharia Law trumps all other laws. It’s meant to overtake and replace all Western civil, criminal, and government jurisdiction. The founding principles of this country did not hinge on a violent ideological theocracy that advocated the deaths of those who didn’t hold the same religious beliefs. What the hell are any of them doing here?  They have no damned business being in this country.
Related post:

https://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2015/03/13/muslim-college-established-in-california-by-anti-israel-pro-terrorist-demagogues/

Related article:

The Complete Timeline of Obama’s Anti-Israel Animosity

From Breitbart.

……this is the culmination of a longtime Obama policy of destroying the US-Israel relationship; Obama has spent his entire life surrounded by haters of Israel, from former Palestine Liberation Organization spokesman Rashid Khalidi to former Jimmy Carter National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, pro-Hamas negotiator Robert Malley to UN Ambassador Samantha Power (who once suggested using American troops to guard Palestinians from Israelis), Jeremiah Wright (who said “Them Jews ain’t going to let him talk to me”) to Professor Derrick Bell (“Jewish neoconservative racists…are undermining blacks in every way they can”). Here is a concise timeline, with credit to Dan Senor and the editors of Commentary.

Excerpts from the Dan Senor article:

February 2008: When running for president, then-Sen. Obama told an audience in Cleveland: “There is a strain within the pro-Israel community that says unless you adopt an unwavering pro-Likud approach to Israel that you’re anti-Israel.” Likud had been out of power for two years when Obama made this statement. At the time the country was being led by the centrist Kadima government of Ehud Olmert, Tzipi Livni and Shimon Peres, and Prime Minister Olmert had been pursuing an unprecedented territorial compromise. As for Likud governments, it was under Likud that Israel made its largest territorial compromises—withdrawals from Sinai and Gaza.

July 2009: Obama hosted American Jewish leaders at the White House, reportedly telling them that he sought to put “daylight” between America and Israel. “For eight years”—during the Bush administration—”there was no light between the United States and Israel, and nothing got accomplished,” he declared.

Nothing? Prime Minister Ariel Sharon uprooted thousands of settlers from their homes in Gaza and the northern West Bank and deployed the Israeli army to forcibly relocate their fellow citizens. Mr. Sharon then resigned from the Likud Party to build a majority party based on a two-state consensus.

In the same meeting with Jewish leaders,  Obama told the group that Israel would need “to engage in serious self-reflection.” This statement stunned the Americans in attendance: Israeli society is many things, but lacking in self-reflection isn’t one of them. It’s impossible to envision the president delivering a similar lecture to Muslim leaders.

September 2009: In his first address to the U.N. General Assembly, President Obama devoted five paragraphs to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, during which he declared (to loud applause) that “America does not accept the legitimacy of continued Israeli settlements.” He went on to draw a connection between rocket attacks on Israeli civilians with living conditions in Gaza. There was not a single unconditional criticism of Palestinian terrorism.

March 2010: During Vice President Joe Biden’s visit to Israel, a Jerusalem municipal office announced plans for new construction in a part of Jerusalem. The president launched an unprecedented weeks-long offensive against Israel. Biden very publicly departed Israel.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton berated Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on a now-infamous 45-minute phone call, telling him that Israel had “harmed the bilateral relationship.” (The State Department triumphantly shared details of the call with the press.) The Israeli ambassador was dressed-down at the State Department, Obama’s Middle East envoy canceled his trip to Israel, and the U.S. joined the European condemnation of Israel.

Moments after Biden concluded his visit to the West Bank, the Palestinian Authority held a ceremony to honor Dalal Mughrabi, who led one of the deadliest Palestinian terror attacks in history: the so-called Coastal Road Massacre that killed 38, including 13 children and an American. The Obama administration was silent. But that same day, on ABC, Axelrod called Israel’s planned construction of apartments in its own capital an “insult” and an “affront” to the United States. Press Secretary Robert Gibbs went on Fox News to accuse Mr. Netanyahu of “weakening trust” between the two countries.

Ten days later, Mr. Netanyahu traveled to Washington to mend fences but was snubbed at a White House meeting with Obama—no photo op, no joint statement, and he was sent out through a side door.

April 2010: Mr. Netanyahu pulled out of the Obama-sponsored Washington summit on nuclear proliferation after it became clear that Turkey and Egypt intended to use the occasion to condemn the Israeli nuclear program, and Obama would not intervene.

March 2011: Obama returned to his habit of urging Israelis to engage in self-reflection, inviting Jewish community leaders to the White House and instructing them to “search your souls” about Israel’s dedication to peace.

May 2011: The State Department issued a press release declaring that the department’s No. 2 official, James Steinberg, would be visiting “Israel, Jerusalem, and the West Bank.” In other words, Jerusalem is not part of Israel. Later in the month, only hours before Mr. Netanyahu departed from Israel to Washington,  Obama delivered his Arab Spring speech, which focused on a demand that Israel return to its indefensible pre-1967 borders with land swaps.

Obama has done everything he can to pander to America’s Islamofascist enemies in the Middle East while insulting and disrespecting Israel repeatedly:

Obama Regime Calls Netanyahu ‘Chickenshit’

Obama, Sarkozy Cought Dissing Netanyahu on Open Mic

Obama to White House Staff After Getting Owned by Netanyahu: “What the fuck was that!?” (That episode followed Barky’s insistence that Israel return to the pre-1967 borders, and Netanyahu let him know that was not going to happen.)

Obama has made himself more than clear on where he stands with regard to Israel, America, and Islam.

Flashback: White House Congratulates Iranians After Rouhani Victory.  If that doesn’t clear things up, nothing will.

Barky really got his panties in a wad when his efforts to undermine Netanyahu’s campaign failed and he was re-elected.

Disrespect our allies and kiss our enemies’ ass. That’s how he rolls.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 473 other followers