First published at Blogcritics as Patriot Act Extended.
Top lawmakers in the House and Senate reached a deal to extend the Patriot Act another four years, allowing the continued use of roving wiretaps, the compelling of businesses to release records, and surveillance of so-called “lone wolf” terror suspects.
“Civil liberties” groups (READ: ACLU) reacted with perfunctory anger.
Surveillance and intelligence gathering on domestic threats is an absolute necessity. The terrorists in this country depend on civil liberties groups like the ACLU, an apparatus for every subversive, anti-democracy malignancy that exists, and invasion of privacy fears to steer laws away from their activities. Paranoid and self-absorbed types who think the NSA listens in on their phone conversations with Grandma, are wasting their angst.
Although the Patriot Act deals with domestic surveillance, not foreign, the point is moot, Bin Laden had connections and collaborators in the United States well before 9/11, and his soul mates are still here.
Terrorists use legitimate businesses as well as social and religious organizations to launder money they use to facilitate operations and attacks. They use pay phones, disposable phones, Blackberries, and third parties to pass information. That’s why roving wiretaps work.
Muslim terrorists are let in by the State Department, crossing the southern border, and making friends with Dem lawmakers, and in the military, and operating carte blanche across the country.
The NSA has its hands full.
If anything, wiretaps should be used to monitor some of Obama’s friends and associates; CAIR, William Ayers, the Arab American Action Network (a terrorist front), the Muslim Brotherhood (another terrorist front), and Hatem El-Hady, former chairman of the Islamic “charity” Kindhearts, which was closed by the US government in February 2006 for terrorist fundraising, just to name a few. And considering everything Obama’s done for national security, eavesdropping on him might not be such a bad idea.
The NSA’s goal is to scan for terrorists. On the flip side, the TSA targetsSoldiers, children, wheel-chair bound cancer patients, and thermoses.
The real threats to civil liberties are things like ObamaCare, his collusion with Google, his net neutrality ploy, Mark Lloyd, the Communications Diversity “czar” in the FCC, who believes freedom of speech is an “exaggeration”, government Obamabots who snoop into the records of citizens who dare to question his spread the wealth socialism, and Dem legislators and their union pals who assault opponents verbally and physically.
Whatever your concerns about the Patriot Act, it pales in comparison to the damage Obama’s doing to national security and civil liberties.
Related posts:
http://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2009/09/16/obama-seeks-to-extend-patriot-act/
http://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2007/07/09/chalk-one-up-for-national-security/
http://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2007/10/01/judge-rules-against-parts-of-patriot-act-in-terrorism-case/
http://sfcmac.wordpress.com/2007/11/28/the-homegrown-terrorism-prevention-act/
Related article:
Posted by sfcmac on 02/08/2011 at 19:49
Alan,
I haven’t been banned from the site or anything like that. I just don’t feel like posting there too often for a few reasons. First, I don’t like the idea of modifying my expressions to suit their sensitivities. Secondly, I don’t like waiting two or three days for the post to be published when I can post the same thing on my blog immediately. Third, and this is minor, I like to hyperlink to posts on my blog which contain numerous other links to external sites and articles, which in my opinion, saves time, but they frown on that. They prefer I just link the external sites.
In anycase, when I post on there again, you’ll know.
SFC MAC
Posted by Alan Kurtz on 01/08/2011 at 17:10
The last time I checked in here, I inquired why you hadn’t posted anything at Blogcritics.org in the preceding 30 days. You replied, “I’ll probably post another article on Blogcritics soon.” That was more than a month ago. It’s now been over two months since your last Blogcritics article. Did you quit posting there? If so, I’m interested in the reason.