Paging the DHS: Muslim Terrorist Groups Forming Political Party in U.S.

What. The. Fuck.?


From Before It’s News.

Islamic terrorist poster


The First Islamist voting bloc? Muslim Brotherhood Launches Own U.S. Political Party. (Investors).

With an eye toward the 2016 election, the radical Muslim Brotherhood has built the framework for a political party in America that seeks to turn Muslims into an Islamist voting bloc.

‘Muslim voters have the potential to be swing voters in 2016,” said Nihad Awad in launching the benign-sounding U.S. Council of Muslim Organizations, whose membership reads like a Who’s Who of Brotherhood front groups.“We are aiming to bring more participation from the Muslim community.”

USCMO also aims to elect Islamists in Washington, with the ultimate objective of “institutionalizing policies” favorable to Islamists — that is, Shariah law.

Well, they already have at least two; a Dhimmi in the White House and a radical muzzie congressman from Minnesota.

This development bears careful monitoring in light of the U.S. Brotherhood’s recently exposed goal to wage a “civilization jihad” against America that explicitly calls for infiltrating the U.S. political system and “destroying (it) from within.”

The subversive plan was spelled out in hundreds of pages of founding archives that the FBI confiscated from a Brotherhood leader’s home in the Washington suburbs after 9/11.

Translated from Arabic, the secret documents listed a number of Brotherhood front organizations — some of which just happen to make up the newly formed USCMO.

Front and center is the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, the catalyst behind this Trojan horse jihadist political party.

CAIR is linked in federal criminal court documents to the terrorist group Hamas, the Brotherhood’s Palestinian branch. CAIR’s chief Awad, who announced the USCMO at the National Press Club, is so radioactive, the FBI refuses to do outreach with him and his so-called Muslim-rights group until it can “resolve whether there continues to be a connection between its executives and Hamas.”

Equally troubling is the Muslim American Society, another founding member of the USCMO. MAS was formed as “the overt arm of the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States,” a 2007 Justice Department court filing states. A 2011 MAS press release praised Osama bin Laden as “a visionary who believed in an Islamic state in Afghanistan.”

The list of bad actors doesn’t end there. The chairman of America’s new Islamist party is none other than Oussama Jammal, who once headed the notorious Bridgeview Mosque in Chicago.

One of that mosque’s leaders was arrested and jailed for funneling millions to Hamas. And one of its most honored guests was bin Laden’s spiritual mentor, the late Palestinian cleric Abdullah Azzam. Some of Azzam’s relatives are Bridgeview members.

“The walls were covered with Hamas posters and recruiting literature showing masked gunmen brandishing automatic weapons. . . . You could see daggers plunged into Jewish hearts wrapped up in American flags,” said Steve Emerson, describing the mosque in his book “American Jihad.”

“They even had a library filled with terrorist videos.”

In 2009, it was reported that CAIR planted interns in D.C. offices. CAIR is a terrorist facilitator that engages in the promotion and funding of terrorist atrocities.   Why is it allowed to operate in this country?

The Muslim Brotherhood has a lengthy history of terrorism and is a serious threat to Western civilization.  Why are they in this country?

Their goals are well documented. It’s a matter of public record.  But Obama continues to shamefully pander to some of the worst muslim thugs on the planet. When Janet “Big Sis” Napolitano was head of the DHS, she made it a policy.

Since the USCMO has announced its theocracy-based entry into the political arena, the Dems will probably offer to make them part of their platform.  Matter of fact, during the 2012 Democratic convention, the scheduled homage to Islamic shitbags was removed only after public uproar. 

Muslims are diametrically opposed to everything America stands for, especially the Constitution. They want Sharia Law and Islam to dominate the West; America in particular:

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant. The Koran . . . should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on earth.”

——CAIR Chairman Omar M. Ahmad to a crowd of California Muslims in July 1998

Every three-letter acronym security agency in the U.S. should be all over these hadjis like stink on shit.  Instead they’re targeting patriots  and outspoken Obama critics.

They’re not worried about an enemy that wants us all dead, they’re frightened of people who want them stopped. With assholes like this in charge who the hell needs Al Qaeda?

But remember, opponents of Islam are “Islamophobes”.




 Related articles:


Western Lawmakers Discuss Taking Back Their Lands From the Feds

Good for them.

From the Salt Lake Trib.

It’s time for Western states to take control of federal lands within their borders, lawmakers and county commissioners from Western states said at Utah’s Capitol on Friday.

More than 50 political leaders from nine states convened for the first time to talk about their joint goal: wresting control of oil-, timber -and mineral-rich lands away from the feds.

“It’s simply time,” said Rep. Ken Ivory, R-West Jordan, who organized the Legislative Summit on the Transfer for Public Lands along with Montana state Sen. Jennifer Fielder. “The urgency is now.”

Utah House Speaker Becky Lockhart, R-Provo, was flanked by a dozen participants, including her counterparts from Idaho and Montana, during a press conference after the daylong closed-door summit. U.S. Sen. Mike Lee addressed the group over lunch, Ivory said. New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Wyoming, Oregon and Washington also were represented.

The summit was in the works before this month’s tense standoff between Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy and the Bureau of Land Management over cattle grazing, Lockhart said.

“What’s happened in Nevada is really just a symptom of a much larger problem,” Lockhart said.

Fielder, who described herself as “just a person who lives in the woods,” said federal land management is hamstrung by bad policies, politicized science and severe federal budget cuts.

“Those of us who live in the rural areas know how to take care of lands,” Fielder said, who lives in the northwestern Montana town of Thompson Falls.

“We have to start managing these lands. It’s the right thing to do for our people, for our environment, for our economy and for our freedoms,” Fielder said.

It certainly is part of a larger problem; an out-of-control federal government that has gotten away with unconstitutional overreach for years. The encroachment of Clive Bundy’s rights is just one of the more publicized incidents.  They’ve also got a criminally malfeasant Senator who would love to grab some of that land for a Chinese-funded solar energy farm.

‘A much larger problem’ is an understatement.

Harry Reid on Rancher’s Rights: ‘You Know Why? Domestic Terrorist, That’s Why!”

Anyone who refuses to goosestep to the big government dictatorship is a domestic terrorist.

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he believes the supporters who rallied around Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy in his fight against the federal government are “domestic terrorists” and Bundy does not respect his country.

The Las Vegas Journal-Review reported that Reid, D-Nev., made the comments at an event Thursday hosted by the paper called “Hashtags & Headlines.”

Federal land managers backed down in a weekend standoff with Bundy after hundreds of states’ rights protesters, including armed militia members, showed up to protest federal officials seizing his cattle. Some protesters had their guns drawn and pointed toward law enforcement, some of whom were also armed. But ultimately, no shots were fired and the Bureau of Land Management reported that officials left over safety concerns.

Reid had harsh words for these supporters, saying the government cannot stop pursuing the issue.

“They’re nothing more than domestic terrorists,” Reid said, according to the paper. “I repeat: what happened there was domestic terrorism.”

You mean like the Chenchen muslim terrorists Tamerlan and Dzhokhar Tsarnaev?  Nidal Hasan?  The Muslim Brotherhood, CAIR, Jamaat Al Fuqura, and the Arab-American Action Network,  that operate carte blanche within our borders?  How about those domestic terrorists, Harry?

Reid said he has been told a federal task force is being set up to deal with the Bundy situation, adding Bundy does not respect the U.S. or its laws.

“Clive Bundy does not recognize the United States,” Reid said. “The United States, he says, is a foreign government. He doesn’t pay his taxes. He doesn’t pay his fees. And he doesn’t follow the law. He continues to thumb his nose at authority.”

Harry, you need to practice what you preach.  You’re one of the biggest lawbreakers in the Democratic party, and that’s saying a lot.

Reid also suggested the supporters were dangerous to the community.

“They had sniper rifles in the freeway. They had weapons, automatic weapons. They had children lined up. They wanted to make sure they got hurt first … What if others tried the same thing?” he said.

The Feds descended on Bundy’s ranch with with helicopters, SWAT teams, APCs, armed federal agents, and probably some lethal chemical weapons before the supporters showed up,  but Bundy was a danger to the community.

Fuck you, Harry.

By the way, the Feds are trying to grab land that rightfully belongs to Nevada. Harry needs to read the statutes of his own state.

From the Nevada statutes:

NRS 321.596  Legislative findings.  The Legislature finds that:

      1.  The State of Nevada has a strong moral claim upon the public land retained by the Federal Government within Nevada’s borders because:

      (a) On October 31, 1864, the Territory of Nevada was admitted to statehood on the condition that it forever disclaim all right and title to unappropriated public land within its boundaries;

      (b) From 1850 to 1894, newly admitted states received 2 sections of each township for the benefit of common schools, which in Nevada amounted to 3.9 million acres;

      (c) In 1880 Nevada agreed to exchange its 3.9-million-acre school grant for 2 million acres of its own selection from public land in Nevada held by the Federal Government;

      (d) At the time the exchange was deemed necessary because of an immediate need for public school revenues and because the majority of the original federal land grant for common schools remained unsurveyed and unsold;

      (e) Unlike certain other states, such as New Mexico, Nevada received no land grants from the Federal Government when Nevada was a territory;

      (f) Nevada received no land grants for insane asylums, schools of mines, schools for the blind and deaf and dumb, normal schools, miners’ hospitals or a governor’s residence as did states such as New Mexico; and

      (g) Nevada thus received the least amount of land, 2,572,478 acres, and the smallest percentage of its total area, 3.9 percent, of the land grant states in the Far West admitted after 1864, while states of comparable location and soil, namely Arizona, New Mexico and Utah, received approximately 11 percent of their total area in federal land grants.

      2.  The State of Nevada has a legal claim to the public land retained by the Federal Government within Nevada’s borders because:

      (a) In the case of the State of Alabama, a renunciation of any claim to unappropriated lands similar to that contained in the ordinance adopted by the Nevada constitutional convention was held by the Supreme Court of the United States to be “void and inoperative” because it denied to Alabama “an equal footing with the original states” in Pollard v. Hagan, 44 U.S. (3 How.) 212 (1845);

      (b) The State of Texas, when admitted to the Union in 1845, retained ownership of all unappropriated land within its borders, setting a further precedent which inured to the benefit of all states admitted later “on an equal footing”; and

      (c) The Northwest Ordinance of 1787, adopted into the Constitution of the United States by the reference of Article VI to prior engagements of the Confederation, first proclaimed the “equal footing” doctrine, and the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, by which the territory including Nevada was acquired from Mexico and which is “the supreme law of the land” by virtue of Article VI, affirms it expressly as to the new states to be organized therein.

      3.  The exercise of broader control by the State of Nevada over the public lands within its borders would be of great public benefit because:

      (a) Federal holdings in the State of Nevada constitute 86.7 percent of the area of the State, and in Esmeralda, Lincoln, Mineral, Nye and White Pine counties the Federal Government controls from 97 to 99 percent of the land;

      (b) Federal jurisdiction over the public domain is shared among 17 federal agencies or departments which adds to problems of proper management of land and disrupts the normal relationship between a state, its residents and its property;

      (c) None of the federal lands in Nevada are taxable and Federal Government activities are extensive and create a tax burden for the private property owners of Nevada who must meet the needs of children of Federal Government employees, as well as provide other public services;

      (d) Under general land laws only 2.1 percent of federal lands in Nevada have moved from federal control to private ownership;

      (e) Federal administration of the retained public lands, which are vital to the livestock and mining industries of the State and essential to meet the recreational and other various uses of its citizens, has been of uneven quality and sometimes arbitrary and capricious; and

      (f) Federal administration of the retained public lands has not been consistent with the public interest of the people of Nevada because the Federal Government has used those lands for armament and nuclear testing thereby rendering many parts of the land unusable and unsuited for other uses and endangering the public health and welfare.

      4.  The intent of the framers of the Constitution of the United States was to guarantee to each of the states sovereignty over all matters within its boundaries except for those powers specifically granted to the United States as agent of the states.

      5.  The attempted imposition upon the State of Nevada by the Congress of the United States of a requirement in the enabling act that Nevada “disclaim all right and title to the unappropriated public lands lying within said territory,” as a condition precedent to acceptance of Nevada into the Union, was an act beyond the power of the Congress of the United States and is thus void.

      6.  The purported right of ownership and control of the public lands within the State of Nevada by the United States is without foundation and violates the clear intent of the Constitution of the United States.

      7.  The exercise of such dominion and control of the public lands within the State of Nevada by the United States works a severe, continuous and debilitating hardship upon the people of the State of Nevada.

      (Added to NRS by 1979, 1362)

His motive has to do with his  plans to take some of that land for a Chinese solar energy farm.   The law is immaterial to scumbags like Reid.

Related post:

Greta VanSusteren: The Tea Party vs Rancid Critics

From her “On the Record” program.

Let’s go “Off the Record” for just a minute. I do not get it. Why are some people, politicians, pundits, and reporters in particular, so vicious and – yes, so arrogant – towards members of the Tea Party?

They don’t have to agree with the Tea Party. No one is forcing them. Frankly, it makes no difference to me if they do or do not agree. But why does their lack of agreement with the Tea Party justify their vicious comments? It’s never even about debate. Instead, it’s smearing, trashing, denigrating, laughing at, and even demonizing the Tea Party, acting as though the Tea Party is a bunch of anarchists, terrorists, kooks and even atheists.

Have they ever even met these Americans? Have they met my panel? They’re not throwing bombs or getting arrested. They are Americans exercising their right to speak up. It’s called the First Amendment. They have families, they have jobs, they pay taxes. And, yes, it is true they don’t like big government. But that’s not a crime. That is protected political thought, the First Amendment.

And, frankly, if you really think about it, it’s not that far out of the mainstream. Politicians from both parties sing the same song. You know all their campaign slogans, “Washington is broken.” They are going to Washington to clean up the mess. They are outsiders, not insiders. It’s really much the same.

Maybe if politicians who are so nasty to the Tea Party focused on common ground instead of taking shots at them, they could actually get something done. But don’t hold your breath.

Right on the money.

Ordinary Americans demand that they actually respect us and the Constitution. For that, the Tea Party  is dismissed, disrespected, and denigrated by leftwingnut politicians, pundits, and main stream media hacks.

The Tea Party is composed of a cross-section of America—average people—who are fed up with the erosion of personal liberties, and the sneering arrogance, hubris, and jack-booted thuggery of the Obama regime.

Compare the Tea Party with the ‘Occupy’ thugs—a motley collection of criminalsvandalsCommunists, Nazis, and anarchists—who rampaged through American cities and left filth and damage in their wake. 

They were embraced by the Dems and Obama as some kind of 60′s flower children redux.

It’s all about power, control, and the subversion of the U.S. Constitution.  Their vision of ‘fundamentally changing’ America into a Euro socialist clone has hit a few sangs.  So, they marginalize dissidents with fatuous accusations of “terrorist” and “unAmerican”.

Trust me, Greta. We get it.

Related posts:


New York Times Hack Smears Veterans as “KKK”

The vicious stupidity of the Left keeps getting worse. 

From The Army Times.

Veterans advocates are denouncing an opinion piece in the New York Times that draws links between veterans and white supremacist groups in attempting to explain the actions of the suspected gunman in a recent and deadly shooting outside a Kansas Jewish center.

Frazier Glenn Cross, also known as Frazier Glenn Miller, is accused of killing three people outside a Jewish community center and Jewish retirement community on April 13, according to media reports. The Fayetteville Observer reported that Miller is a former Ku Klux Klan leader as well as a retired master sergeant who served in Army Special Forces. He was forced to retire in 1979 for distributing racist materials.

In the opinion piece published in the New York Times, Kathleen Belew wrote that while the majority of veterans are neither violent nor mentally ill, veterans have a history of joining right-wing extremist groups. She cites a 2009 Department of Homeland Security Report linking the return of combat veterans to Ku Klux Klan membership.

By the way, that 2009 Enemies of the State assessment was concocted by Janet “Big Sis” Napolitano. She  listed Iraq/Afghanistan veterans, Obama critics, gun owners, and Americans who want our immigration laws enforced, as ‘domestic threats’.   That list was later expanded to include political opponents, white middle class Americans, and Americans who covet individual liberties.  By their definition, that makes me a threat.

What about black and Hispanic veterans? No studies or OpEds about their affinity for gangs?

It’s unlikely that Belew holds the same hatred for the likes of Nidal Hasan, the radical muslim zealot who murdered 13 Soldiers at Ft. Hood.  He was never even deployed to Iraq or Afghanistan.

The real threat—atrocities and terrorist attacks carried out by muzzie terrorists in the name of Islam—are now referred to as “man-caused disasters”.  The government and the military hierarchy are  rife with Islamofascist apologists.

Belew also dropped the Timothy McVeigh meme in her diatribe. Last I checked,  Timothy McVeigh did not have a world-wide network of fanatical comrades. He and Terry Nichols carried out the Oklahoma City bombing by themselves. Their single act of terrorism pales in comparison to the well funded and organized Islamofascist jihad. 
Matter of fact, they’ve got quite a world-wide body count.

The Left conjures up the KKK hoodies and other boogeymen whenever they want to demonize the military, the GOP, and the Tea Party.

Belew is totally ignorant of the fact that Nathan Bedford Forrest was a Democrat and the KKK was the terrorist wing of the Democrat Party throughout the Jim Crow South.  The Dems have quite a racist history to contend with,  and they’ve done everything to deny, cover up, and revise the chronicles of their bigotry.

Remember Sen. Robert Byrd (D-WV)?  He was a Grand Kleagle in th KKK. 

Expect nothing less from this filthy rag. Shilling for Islam, Obama, and the Left, is ‘everything that’s fit to print’.

Belew is a faculty member Northwestern University.  She “teaches courses on the American Vigilante, Histories of Violence in the United States, the Vietnam War, and comparative race and racism.”   Academic intelligentsia at its finest.

Related posts:

Related articles:


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 303 other followers