After blaming the latest fucked up Whitehouse terrorist response on Republicans, John Brennan whined some more in a USA Today OpEd piece.
In an oped in USA Today, John Brennan — Assistant to the President and Deputy National Security Advisor for Homeland Security and Counterterrorism — responds to critics of the Obama administration’s counterterrorism policies by saying “Politically motivated criticism and unfounded fear-mongering only serve the goals of al-Qaeda.”
Brennan writes that, “Terrorists are not 100-feet tall. Nor do they deserve the abject fear they seek to instill.”
This is coming from a regime that makes a habit out of politicizing legitimate concern over their ate-up approach to Islamic terrorism.
Speaking of “politically motivated criticism”, there was no shortage of that from the Dems throughout George Bush’s tenure.
The parade of Democratic Party wackjobs made daily appearances to spew their anger at the military, Bush, and the war on Islamofascist zealots. Charles Rangel, Cynthia McKinney, Patty Murray, Nancy Pelosi, Sheila Jackson-Lee, Dick Durbin, Harry Reid and Howard Dean never skipped an opportunity to vent politically motivated criticism.
The average Hadji that straps a bomb to their ass and blows up people for allah, doesn’t have to be 100 feet tall.
Brennan said:
……They will, however, be dismantled and destroyed, by our military, our intelligence services and our law enforcement community.
As long as you get the fuck out of the way and let them do their job….and maybe BRIEF them about your decisions once in a fucking while.
And the notion that America’s counterterrorism professionals and America’s system of justice are unable to handle these murderous miscreants is absurd.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/02/wh-some-critics-serving-the-goals-of-al-qaeda.html
It would be nice to handle them with brass knuckles instead of kid gloves, you assclown.
Obama’s way of “handling” the muslim terrorist threat and atrocities, is to assign PC terms like “man-caused disasters”. He has no strategy in Afghanistan because “winning isn’t necessarily a goal”. He’s an apologist for domestic terrorism. His idea of rewarding CIA interrogators who saved countless American lives was to threaten prosecution. He serves as a Dhimmi tool; aiding terrorist groups, granting Constitutional rights to foreign enemy combatants, freeing some terrorists so they can pick up where they left off, and now he wants to try some of the most evil, degenerate muslim shit bags in a civilian court instead of in front of a military tribunal.
The Bush administration used civilian courts while military tribunals were formed and going through an endless bureaucratic mess of legal wrangling and a search for a secure location. The terrorists who were too dangerous for an ordinary court setting were kept at GITMO.
The hidden message here is that anyone who criticizes THE ONE’s approach to Islamic terrorism, (or health care and the economy) is labled a “fear-monger”. To tell the truth, I’m just as afraid of the feckless incompetence and stupidity of Obama’s regime, as I am another Al Qaeda attack.
Related Post:
